Genetically Predicted Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Coronary Artery Disease: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization.

Inflammation contributes to atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). In order to help identify therapeutic targets, it is important to ascertain whether biomarkers associated with CAD risk are causal. In a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials, neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with increased cardiovascular risk 1 . We investigate a potential causal nature of this relationship by performing Mendelian randomization (MR) analyse

Lipoproteins act as vehicles for lipid antigen delivery and activation of invariant natural killer T cells

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells act at the interface between lipid metabolism and immunity because of their restriction to lipid antigens presented on CD1d by antigen-presenting cells (APCs). How foreign lipid antigens are delivered to APCs remains elusive. Since lipoproteins routinely bind glycosylceramides structurally similar to lipid antigens, we hypothesized that circulating lipoproteins form complexes with foreign lipid antigens. In this study, we used 2-color fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to show, for the first time to our knowledge, stable complex formation of lipid antigens α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer), isoglobotrihexosylceramide, and OCH, a sphingosine-truncated analog of αGalCer, with VLDL and/or LDL in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate LDL receptor–mediated (LDLR-mediated) uptake of lipoprotein-αGalCer complexes by APCs, leading to potent complex-mediated activation of iNKT cells in vitro and in vivo. Finally, LDLR-mutant PBMCs of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia showed impaired activation and proliferation of iNKT cells upon stimulation, underscoring the relevance of lipoproteins as a lipid antigen delivery system in humans. Taken together, circulating lipoproteins form complexes with lipid antigens to facilitate their transport and uptake by APCs, leading to enhanced iNKT cell activation. This study thereby reveals a potentially novel mechanism of lipid antigen delivery to APCs and provides further insight into the immunological capacities of circulating lipoproteins

The iterative lipid impact on inflammation in atherosclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lipid-mediated atherogenesis is hallmarked by a chronic inflammatory state. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TRLs), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are causally related to atherosclerosis. Within the paradigm of endothelial activation and subendothelial lipid deposition, these lipoproteins induce numerous pro-inflammatory pathways. In this review, we will outline the effects of lipoproteins on systemic inflammatory pathways in atherosclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins exert a variety of pro-inflammatory effects, ranging from the local artery to systemic immune cell activation. LDL-C, TRLs, and Lp(a) induce endothelial dysfunction with concomitant activation of circulating monocytes through enhanced lipid accumulation. The process of trained immunity of the innate immune system, predominantly induced by LDL-C particles, hallmarks the propagation of the low-grade inflammatory response. In concert, bone marrow activation induces myeloid skewing, further contributing to immune cell mobilization and plaque progression. SUMMARY: Lipoproteins and inflammation are intertwined in atherogenesis. Elucidating the inflammatory pathways will provide new opportunities for therapeutic agents

Lipoprotein(a): An underestimated inflammatory mastermind

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with elevated levels of Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L; >50 mg/dl) display increased arterial wall inflammation characterized by activation of the endothelium by Lp(a)-carried oxidized phospholipids and recruitment of circulating monocytes. This results in increased secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased migration of leukocytes through the vessel wall. In addition, Lp(a) is also pivotal in the initiation phase of aortic valve stenosis. The oxidized phospholipids associated, in part, with the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety of Lp(a) stimulate the aortic valve residential cell, the valve interstitial cells (VICs), to either induce osteoblastic differentiation or apoptosis, thereby initiating the process of aortic valve calcification. Lastly, Lp(a) has been linked to systemic inflammation, including the acute phase response. Specifically, the cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) has a unique relationship with Lp(a), since the LPA gene contains IL-6 response elements. In this review, we will discuss the pathways and cell types affected by Lp(a) in the context of atherosclerosis, aortic valve stenosis and the acute phase response, highlighting the role of Lp(a) as an inflammatory mastermind

Lipoprotein(a): An underestimated inflammatory mastermind

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with elevated levels of Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L; >50 mg/dl) display increased arterial wall inflammation characterized by activation of the endothelium by Lp(a)-carried oxidized phospholipids and recruitment of circulating monocytes. This results in increased secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased migration of leukocytes through the vessel wall. In addition, Lp(a) is also pivotal in the initiation phase of aortic valve stenosis. The oxidized phospholipids associated, in part, with the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety of Lp(a) stimulate the aortic valve residential cell, the valve interstitial cells (VICs), to either induce osteoblastic differentiation or apoptosis, thereby initiating the process of aortic valve calcification. Lastly, Lp(a) has been linked to systemic inflammation, including the acute phase response. Specifically, the cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) has a unique relationship with Lp(a), since the LPA gene contains IL-6 response elements. In this review, we will discuss the pathways and cell types affected by Lp(a) in the context of atherosclerosis, aortic valve stenosis and the acute phase response, highlighting the role of Lp(a) as an inflammatory mastermind

Interleukin 6 in diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives

Introduction: Diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are cardiometabolic diseases that remain amongst the leading causes of morbidity and premature mortality. Here, we review the current understanding of how anti-inflammatory intervention via inhibition of the pro-inflammatory but pleiotropic cytokine interleukin (IL) 6 may benefit patients with these or related diseases or complications. Areas covered: Based on a PubMed literature search, this review integrates and contextualizes evidence regarding the clinical utility of anti-IL-6 intervention in the treatment of cardiometabolic diseases, as well as of the associated condition nonalcoholic hepatosteatosis. Expert opinion: Evidence implicates the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-6 in the pathophysiology of diabetes, CKD and CVD. Thus, targeting the IL-6 pathway holds a therapeutic potential in these cardiometabolic disorders. However, because IL-6 has multiple homeostatic roles, antagonizing this cytokine may be associated with side effects, such as increased risk of infection as seen with other anti-inflammatory drugs. Additional studies are required to establish the benefit-risk profile of anti-IL-6 intervention in the cardiometabolic diseases, whilst also considering alternative interventions such as lifestyle changes. IL-6 is also elevated in NASH, but the clinical usefulness of targeting IL-6 in this hepatic disorder remains largely unexplored

Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin versus sulphonylurea glimepiride on systemic haemodynamics in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes: A secondary analysis of an 8-week, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

Aim: To determine the glucose-independent effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor linagliptin versus the sulphonylurea glimepiride on systemic haemodynamics in the fasting and postprandial state in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods: In this prespecified secondary analysis of a phase IV, double-blind trial, 46 metformin-treated, overweight patients with T2D were included and randomly assigned (1:1) to once-daily linagliptin (5 mg) or glimepiride (1 mg) for 8 weeks. In a sub-study involving 26 patients, systemic haemodynamics were also assessed following a standardized liquid meal (Nutridrink Yoghurt style). Systemic haemodynamics (oscillometric device and finger photoplethysmography), arterial stiffness (applanation tonometry) and cardiac sympathovagal balance (heart rate variability [HRV]) were measured in the fasting state and repetitively following the meal. Ewing tests were performed in the fasting state. Results: From baseline to week 8, linagliptin compared with glimepiride did not affect systemic haemodynamics, arterial stiffness or HRV in the fasting state. Linagliptin increased parasympathetic nervous activity, as measured by the Valsalva manoeuvre (P =.021) and deep breathing test (P =.027) compared with glimepiride. Postprandially, systolic blood pressure (SBP) dropped an average of 7.6 ± 1.6 mmHg. Linagliptin reduced this decrease to 0.7 ± 2.3 mmHg, which was significant to glimepiride (P =.010). Conclusions: When compared with glimepiride, linagliptin does not affect fasting blood pressure. However, linagliptin blunted the postprandial drop in SBP, which could benefit patients with postprandial hypotension