3 research outputs found

    Long-Term Cardiac Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Aortic Valve Disease Following Liver Transplantation: A Case Matching Study

    No full text
    Introduction. This retrospective study examined the role of aortic valve (AV) disease in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to determine the incidence of postoperative cardiac morbidity and mortality when compared with a matched control group without AV disease. Methods. Patients were included in the AV group if diagnosed with aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation or had received AV replacement prior to OLT. The AV group (n = 53) was matched to a control group (n = 212) with the following preoperative variables: type of organ transplanted, age, gender, race, body mass index, MELD, redo-transplantation, preoperative renal replacement therapy, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, viral hepatitis, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. A 1:4 ratio was utilized to improve the efficiency and power of the analysis. Results. No significant difference in survival or posttransplant cardiac complications (acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, or dysrhythmia) was observed between groups. However, statistically significantly more patients—11% (6/53)—required coronary intervention following OLT in the AV group, whereas 3% (7/212) required coronary intervention (χ = 5.8; P =.0156) in the control group. Following OLT, 9% (5/53) in the AV group required surgical or nonsurgical AV intervention, whereas no valvular events were observed in the control group. Event-free survival in the AV group, with an end point defined as AV intervention (n = 5) and death (n = 10), was 92% (49/53) at 1 year, 83% (44/53) at 3 years, and 72% (38/53) at 5 years. Conclusions. Patients with pretransplant AV replacement or AS have significant cardiac complications (myocardial infarction, AV replacement, or cardiac death) in 1 to 3 years post-OLT

    Thromboprophylaxis With Heparin During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Comparison of Hepcon HMS Plus and Anti-Xa Assays for Low-Range Heparin

    No full text
    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the agreement between two heparin assays, Hepcon HMS plus/Kaolin-ACT and Anti-Xa, and their predictive power in detecting circulating heparin levels post-reperfusion of the liver graft when compared with thromboelastogram (TEG) r time ratio in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Design: Prospective, observational cohort study design. Setting: Single center, university hospital. Participants: Thirty-eight consecutive adults who had undergone liver transplant. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Paired arterial blood samples were collected before surgical incision, 5 minutes after administration of an average dose of 2,054 771 units of intravenous unfractionated heparin before caval cross-clamping, 5 minutes after portal reperfusion, 5 minutes after hepatic artery reperfusion, and 1 hour after hepatic artery reperfusion. The observations that heparin assay measurements were within the predetermined limits of agreement, strongly suggested the two heparin assays (Hepcon HMS plus and Anti-Xa assay) are interchangeable during prophylactic heparin dose therapy during OLT. Post-reperfusion, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed high accuracy in measuring circulating heparin levels with both Anti-Xa and Hepcon HMS assays when compared with the TEG r time ratio assay. Conclusions: The point-of-care Hepcon HMS plus/Kaolin-ACT (activated clotting time) assay appeared to be a reliable alternative to the more expensive and laboratory-required Anti-Xa assay in monitoring the response to intravenous heparin in patients undergoing OLT. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

    Epsilon-aminocaproic acid has no association with thromboembolic complications, renal failure, or mortality after liver transplantation

    No full text
    Objectives: To examine the role of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) administered after reperfusion of the donor liver in the incidences of thromboembolic events and acute kidney injury within 30 days after orthotopic liver transplantation. One-year survival rates between the EACA-treated and EACA-nontreated groups also were examined.Design: Retrospective, observational, cohort study design.Setting: Single-center, university hospital.Participants: The study included 708 adult liver transplantations performed from 2008 to 2013.Interventions: None.Measurements and Main Results: EACA administration was not associated with incidences of intracardiac thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (1.3%) or intraoperative death (0.6%). Logistic regression (n = 708) revealed 2 independent risk factors associated with myocardial ischemia (age and pre-transplant vasopressor use) and 8 risk factors associated with the need for post-transplant dialysis (age, female sex, redo orthotopic liver transplantation, preoperative sodium level, pre-transplant acute kidney injury or dialysis, platelet transfusion, and re-exploration within the first week after transplant); EACA was not identified as a risk factor for either outcome. One-year survival rates were similar between groups: 92% in EACA-treated group versus 93% in the EACA-nontreated group.Conclusions: The antifibrinolytic, EACA, was not associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic complications or postoperative acute kidney injury, and it did not alter 1-year survival after liver transplantation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
    corecore