Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as retroperitoneal fibrosis: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast represents approximately 6.3% of mammary malignancies. Distant metastasis of invasive lobular carcinoma to the peritoneum or retroperitoneum has been reported fairly frequently.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report the case of a 59-year-old Caucasian-Canadian woman with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting with retroperitoneal fibrosis and bilateral ureteral obstruction. Intra-operative pathology consultation did not reveal malignancy. The diagnosis, however, was confirmed on permanent sections by histological appearance in addition to immunohistochemistry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting with retroperitoneal fibrosis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In a case of unexplained ureteric obstruction and retroperitoneal fibrosis, more comprehensive physical examination and additional ancillary studies may be warranted to rule out malignancy as an underlying etiology. This case also emphasizes that intra-operative frozen section consultation cannot always be fully relied upon to exclude a malignancy as the etiology of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Moreover, in permanent histopathology sections, immunohistochemistry testing can be of value to rule out metastatic disease where the morphology is not salient. There is a need for a thorough physical examination of patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis, including the breast and gynecological organs.</p

Robot-assisted ureterolysis, retroperitoneal biopsy, and omental wrap: Pilot series for the treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Background and Purpose: Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is an uncommon disease of vague cause distinguished by a chronic inflammatory response. Traditionally, RPF with ureteral involvement has been managed with open ureterolysis and transposition, with excellent success rates. More recently, laparoscopic ureterolysis has been described. Here, we report our experience of managing idiopathic RPF with robot-assisted ureterolysis, retroperitoneal biopsy, and ureteral omental wrapping. Patients and Methods: We performed robot-assisted ureterolysis, retroperitoneal biopsy, and ureteral omental wrapping on five consecutive patients between April and October 2006. The same technique was used for all five patients, except for the omental wrapping. Initially, omental wrapping was performed laparoscopically, but in the last two patients, it was performed entirely robotically. We analyzed our patients\u27 data retrospectively. Results: The mean operative time was 220.5 minutes and 390 minutes for unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively; mean blood loss 33.4 mL; mean length of stay 2.8 days; and mean follow-up was 5.6 months. All patients have remained free of obstruction since surgery and no longer need pain medication. Conclusions: Our study suggests that robot-assisted ureterolysis with laparoscopic or robot-assisted omental wrapping is a feasible alternative to the more morbid open procedure and compares favorably to the purely laparoscopic technique with respect to operative times, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and postoperative relief of obstruction. This procedure can be performed entirely robotically, which provided several advantages over the other techniques. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2008