Measuring analyticity and syntheticity in creoles

Creoles (here including expanded pidgins) are commonly viewed as being more analytic than their lexifiers and other languages in terms of grammatical marking. The purpose of the study reported in this article was to examine the validity of this view by measuring the frequency of analytic (and synthetic) markers in corpora of two different English-lexified creoles - Tok Pisin and Hawai'i Creole- and comparing the quantitative results with those for other language varieties. To measure token frequency, 1,000 randomly selected words in each creole corpus were tagged with regard to word class, and categorized as being analytic, synthetic, both analytic and synthetic, or purely lexical. On this basis, an Analyticity Index and a Syntheticity Index were calculated. These were first compared to indices for other languages and then to L1 varieties of English (e.g. standard British and American English and British dialects) and L2 varieties (e.g. Singapore English and Hong Kong English). Type frequency was determined by the size of the inventories of analytic and synthetic markers used in the corpora, and similar comparisons were made. The results show that in terms of both token and type frequency of grammatical markers, the creoles are not more analytic than the other varieties. However, they are significantly less synthetic, resulting in much higher ratios of analytic to synthetic marking. An explanation for this finding relates to the particular strategy for grammatical expansion used by individuals when the creoles were developing

Between simplification and complexification: non-standard varieties of English around the world

In this talk we will report on recent and ongoing research on large-scale morphosyntactic variation in non-standard varieties of English. Our empirical basis will be what may be called the ‘World Atlas of Morphosyntactic Variation in English’, which is an outgrowth of the largest comparative study (Kortmann and Szmrecsanyi 2004) to date of entire grammatical subsystems of varieties of English worldwide. A catalogue of 76 morphosyntactic features taken from 11 core areas of English morphosyntax was investigated for 46 (groups of) non-standard varieties of English around the world, including 20 L1 varieties, 11 L2 varieties, and 15 Pidgins and Creoles from all seven anglophone world regions (the British Isles, the Americas, the Caribbean, the Pacific Archipelagos, Australasia, Africa, South and Southeast Asia). We will show that the varieties of English can be thought of as varying along two major morphosyntactic dimensions: analyticity and complexity. We will discuss this variance, along with Greenbergian-type indices of inflectional complexity (Greenberg 1960) derived from naturalistic corpus data, in light of (a) the various complexity notions currently debated in the literature (notably Dahl 2004, McWhorter 2001, Hawkins 2004), and (b) Trudgill's suggestion (forthcoming) that in varieties of Englis