11 research outputs found
Data analysis of electronic nose technology in lung cancer: Generating prediction models by means of Aethena
INTRODUCTION: Only 15% of lung cancer cases present with potentially curable disease. Therefore, there is much interest in a fast, non-invasive tool to detect lung cancer earlier. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose technology measures volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath that are associated with lung cancer. METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the Aeonose™ is currently being studied in a multi-centre, prospective study in 210 subjects suspected for lung cancer, where approximately half will have a confirmed diagnosis and the other half will have a rejected diagnosis of lung cancer. We will also include 100-150 healthy control subjects. The eNose Company (provider of the Aeonose™) uses a software program, called Aethena, comprising pre-processing, data compression and neural networks to handle big data analyses. Each individual exhaled breath measurement comprises a data matrix with thousands of conductivity values. This is followed by data compression using a Tucker3-like algorithm, resulting in a vector. Subsequently, model selection takes place after entering vectors with different presets in an artificial neural network to train and evaluate the results. Next, a 'judge model' is formed, which is a combination of models for optimizing performance. Finally, two types of cross-validation, being 'leave-10%-out' cross-validation and 'bagging', are used when recalculating the judge models. These judge models are subsequently used to classify new, blind measurements. DISCUSSION: Data analysis in eNose technology is principally based on generating prediction models that need to be validated internally and externally for eventual use in clinical practice. This paper describes the analysis of big data, captured by eNose technology in lung cancer. This is done by means of generating prediction models with Aethena, a data analysis program specifically developed for analysing VOC data
Optimal adherence with inhaled corticosteroids is related to better health status
Objective: To study the relationship between therapy adherence with inhaled corticosteroids and health status measured with the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). Methods: Therapy adherence and health status (CCQ) of 583 patients was recorded from pharmacy records over 3 years. It was expressed as percentage and deemed good at 75-125%, suboptimal at 5075%, and poor at 125%. Results: Optimal adherence showed highest quality of life (lower scores) on questions 1 (short of breath at rest), 3 (concerned getting a cold, breathing getting worse), 8 (limited in moderate physical activities) 9 (limited in daily activity) There were no differences in domain and total scores (data not shown) between the adherence groups. Conclusion: Optimal adherence always scored highest on quality of life, although not significant on every question/domain. (Table Presented)
Combining exhaled-breath analysis data with clinical parameters to improve the diagnosis of lung cancer
Introduction: Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC’s), reflecting pathological processes, might detect lung cancer at an early stage, possibly leading to improved outcomes. Combining breath patterns with clinical parameters may improve the accuracy to diagnose lung cancer. Methods: In a multi-center study 144 subjects diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 146 healthy subjects breathed into the Aeonose™ (The eNose Company, Zutphen, Netherlands). The diagnostic accuracy, presented as Area under the Curve (AUC) of the Aeonose™ sec was compared with the diagnostic accuracy when combined with clinical parameters in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Confirmed NSCLC patients (67.1 (9.0) years; 57.6% male) were compared with controls without NSCLC (62.1 (7.1) years; 40.4% male). The AUC of the absolute Aeonose™ value obtained by a trained neural network was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.82). Adding age, number of pack years, and presence of COPD to this absolute value of the Aeonose™ from the neural network resulted in an improved performance with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90). By choosing an appropriate threshold value in the ROC-diagram of the multivariate model, we observed a sensitivity of 95.7%, a specificity of 59.7%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 69.5% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion: Adding readily available clinical information to the absolute obtained value of exhaled-breath analysis with the Aeonose™ improves the diagnostic accuracy to detect the presence or absence of lung cancer
Quality of life and adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and tiotropium in COPD are related
Background: Poor adherence to inhaled medications in COPD patients seems to be associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization. Knowing the determinants of nonadherence to inhaled medications is important for creating interventions to improve adherence. Objectives: To identify disease-specific and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) factors, associated with adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and tiotropium in COPD patients. Methods: Adherence of 795 patients was recorded over 3 years and was deemed optimal at .75%–#125%, suboptimal at 1 hospitalizations in the year prior to inclusion in this study (OR =2.67) had an increased risk of suboptimal adherence to ICS instead of optimal adherence. An increased risk of underuse was predicted by a higher FEV1/VC (OR =1.05). Predictors for the risk of overuse were a lower FEV1 (OR =0.49), higher scores on Clinical COPD Questionnaire-question 3 (anxiety for dyspnea) (OR =1.26), and current smoking (OR =1.73). Regarding tiotropium, predictors for suboptimal use were a higher FEV1/VC (OR =1.03) and the inability to perform usual activities as asked by the EuroQol-5D questionnaire (OR =3.09). A higher FEV1/VC also was a predictor for the risk of underuse compared to optimal adherence (OR =1.03). The risk of overuse increased again with higher scores on Clinical COPD Questionnaire-question 3 (OR =1.46). Conclusion: Several disease-specific and quality of life factors are related to ICS and tiotropium adherence, but a clear profile of a nonadherent patient cannot yet be outlined. Overusers of ICS and tiotropium experience more anxiety
Improving lung cancer diagnosis by combining exhaled-breath data and clinical parameters
Introduction: Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds could detect lung cancer earlier, possibly leading to improved outcomes. Combining exhaled-breath data with clinical parameters may improve lung cancer diagnosis. Methods: Based on data from a previous multi-centre study, this article reports additional analyses. 138 subjects with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 143 controls without NSCLC breathed into the Aeonose. The diagnostic accuracy, presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), of the Aeonose itself was compared with 1) performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the distinct clinical parameters obtained, and 2) using this clinical information beforehand in the training process of the artificial neural network (ANN) for the breath analysis. Results: NSCLC patients (mean±sd age 67.1±9.1 years, 58% male) were compared with controls (62.1±7.0 years, 40.6% male). The AUC-ROC of the classification value of the Aeonose itself was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.81). Adding age, number of pack-years and presence of COPD to this value in a multivariate regression analysis resulted in an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81–0.90). Adding these clinical variables beforehand to the ANN for classifying the breath print also led to an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.79–0.89). Conclusions: Adding readily available clinical information to the classification value of exhaled-breath analysis with the Aeonose, either post hoc in a multivariate regression analysis or a priori to the ANN, significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy to detect the presence or absence of lung cancer