2 research outputs found

    Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation

    Get PDF
    PurposeTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients.MethodsOne hundred forty seven TNBC patients with complete clinical data and up to 18 year follow-up were collected from Turku University Hospital, Finland. Eight biomarkers for cell division were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics.ResultsAge at diagnosis was the decisive factor predicting disease-specific mortality in TNBC (p = 0.002). The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67, predicted survival only when combined with age. The outcome and prognostic features differed significantly between age groups, middle-aged patients showing the most favorable outcome. Among young patients, only lack of basal differentiation predicted disease outcome, indicating 4.5-fold mortality risk (p = 0.03). Among patients aged > 57, the established prognostic features predicted disease outcome with up to 3.0-fold mortality risk for tumor size ≥ 2 cm (p = 0.001). Concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among patients aged > 57 years (p = 0.009). Among the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, only geminin predicted disease outcome, indicating up to 6.2-fold increased risk of mortality for tumor size p = 0.03).ConclusionTraditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients. Young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Increased proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC.</p

    Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups - prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation

    No full text
    Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease presenting with various molecular subtypes. Compared to the other subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) affects younger patients and is associated with more aggressive course of disease. Due to the lack of Erb-B2-amplification as well as both estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, TNBC is considered as a therapeutic challenge. Currently treatment decisions are based on traditional prognostic features including TNM-stage, patient’s age at diagnosis, and to some extent the cancer cell proliferation but no clinically applicable biomarkers are available for identifying the prognosis of individual TNBC patients. Uncontrollable proliferation is one of the key features of malignant transformation, and an established prognostic feature projecting tumor biology. The aim of the study was to evaluate combined prognostic impact of traditional clinical features and novel cell-cycle progression associated biomarkers in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients. The study comprises 147 TNBC patients diagnosed and treated between 2000–2015 in Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. Clinical and complete, up to 18 years, follow-up data as well as tissue material of the representative cancer specimen was obtained from Auria Biobank. The tissue material was arranged in tissue microarrays (TMAs) and eight cell division associated biomarkers were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics. Results of this study emphasize the nature of TNBC as a heterogeneous disease entity with varying courses of disease in different age groups. The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67 predicted survival only when combined with age. Among young patients, lack of basal differentiation was the only feature predicting unfavorable disease outcome. Middle-aged patients showed the most favorable outcome, and concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among this patient group. Concerning the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, geminin, associated with tumor size <2cm, predicted an increased risk of mortality. The study provides additional support for the hypothesis that young TNBC patients comprise a unique disease entity, while elderly patients represent a more coherent subgroup. Therefore, young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Traditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients, and proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC
    corecore