Embryo implantation: biology, evaluation, and enhancement

Purpose of review: implantation is an essential step in the development of a pregnancy, but often fails in humans. In assisted reproductive technologies, implantation failure continues to impair treatment outcomes, with distressing results for patients and physicians.Recent findings: morphokinetics, comprehensive chromosome screening, and the analysis of embryo-derived products detectable in spent culture media offer new means of assessing embryo viability. However, all await validation in randomized controlled trials. Genomic, transcriptomic, and secretomic technologies are similarly being exploited to define specific biomarkers of endometrial receptivity with the aim of identifying novel therapeutic interventions. However, to date no single, clinically relevant molecular marker capable of indicating endometrial receptivity has been reported. Recent work continues to describe the key signalling pathways which result in acceptance or rejection of the implanting embryo. In-vitro studies have revealed that the decidualized endometrium plays an important role in natural embryo selection, which could change our understanding of the aetiology and treatment of reproductive failure.Summary: recent developments in analytical techniques have initiated a search for biomarkers of embryo quality and endometrial receptivity, and in-vitro studies have revealed novel roles for the decidualized endometrium as a biosensor of embryo qualit

Recurrent pre-clinical pregnancy loss is unlikely to be a "cause" of unexplained infertility

BACKGROUND A proportion of women with ‘unexplained’ infertility may present with subfertility because their pregnancies fail before they are clinically recognized. In order to test whether pre-clinical early pregnancy losses (EPL) occur more frequently in women with unexplained infertility, serial urinary hCG concentrations were measured to compare EPL per cycle rates following spontaneous conception in patients with unexplained infertility versus healthy volunteers.METHODS Sixty patients under 39 years of age with unexplained infertility and 60 healthy controls, who were trying to conceive spontaneously, participated in this study. All participants were asked to collect daily urine samples from cycle day 14 until menstruation for three consecutive cycles or until a positive pregnancy test was obtained.Urinary hCG and creatinine levels were measured by immunoassay. Implantation was detected when urinary hCG levels rose above reference levels constructed from samples obtained from 12 women not attempting to conceive. EPL rates were determined by a linear mixed model using logarithmically transformed hCG/creatinine data.RESULTS In the 133 cycles of 60 women with unexplained infertility, just one implantation was detected, which became an ongoing pregnancy. In contrast, in 103 such cycles in 46 control patients, 30 implantations were detected (24 clinical pregnancies, 6 cases of EPL). The odds ratio for EPL/cycle in the unexplained versus control group was 0 (95% confidence interval: 0–0.795, P= 0.026).CONCLUSIONS Our data do not support the hypothesis that recurrent EPL may present as unexplained infertility. Post-implantation failure is therefore unlikely to contribute significantly to the presentation of subfertility.<br/