64 research outputs found
A Note on Social Support Interventions to The Elderly : Research on 'Meals on Wheels' PartII
ãããŸã§ã«çè
ãã¯ãè¥ã»äžå¹Žéœ¢å¥³æ§ãããã¯é«å¹Žéœ¢å¥³æ§ã®åãçµã¶ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ãµããŒããããã¯ãŒã¯ïŒSNWãšç¥ãïŒã®ç¹æ§ãã粟ç¥çå¥åº·ã«ã©ã®ãããªåœ±é¿ãåãŒããŠãããã«ã€ããŠæ€èšããŠããïŒç°äžã»ééã1994;ç°äžã1995;å
µé ã»ç°äžã1995ïŒãç¹ã«é«éœ¢è
ã«å¯ŸããŠã¯ãSNWã®éèŠæ§ã泚ç®ãããŠããŠãããé«éœ¢è
ã®çŠç¥ãšå»çã®åºæ¬ååã¯ãäœã¿æ
£ããå°åã®äœæ°ãšç©æ¥µçã«é¢ããåããªããã察象è
ãäœå®
ã®ãŸãŸå°åç掻ãå¯èœãªéãç¶ããããšã§ãããšããèªèã確ç«ãããŠããŠãããïŒé£é ã1980ïŒããããã£ãæå³ãããå°åã§ã®ç掻ãç¶ç¶ããŠããããã«ãé«éœ¢è
ãšå°åãšãåãçµã¶SNWã¯ãäžå¯æ¬ ãªèŠçŽ ãšãªã£ãŠããããããŠã±ã¢ã®æŠå¿µã¯ç掻ã«æ ¹ãããæŠå¿µãšããŠæãããã察象è
ã«å¯ŸããŠå
æ¬çãªãã®ã§ãããæ¥åžžçã§ãã€çŽæ¥çãªå¯Ÿå¿ãéèŠèŠãããããã«ãªã£ãŠããŠããããšãããæ é€æåã«ã€ããŠã¯ç掻ã®äžæ¢ããªããã®ã§ãããæ¥åžžçã§ãã€çŽæ¥çãªå¯Ÿå¿ãæ±ãããããå€ãã®ç 究è
ã«ãããç¬å±
矀ããã以å€ã®å±
äœåœ¢æ
ã«å±ããé«éœ¢è
ãšæ¯èŒããŠãé£ç©æåè¡åã®é¢ã§åé¡ãå€ãæ±ããŠããããšãææãããŠããããŸããæ柀ïŒ1993aïŒã¯ãç¬å±
矀ã®å Žåãå¥å±
åãå人ã»è¿é£ãªã©ãšã®ç€ŸäŒççŽåž¯ã®å€å¯¡ããç¬å±
家æã®ä»£æ¿ãšããŠä¿å¥è¡åé¢ã§ã®åé¡ã®è§£æ¶ã«å¯äžãããšãã仮説ã®æ€èšŒãè¡ããæ¯æããçµæãåŸãŠããããããã®ããšã«ãããç¬å±
è
ã«å¯ŸãããœãŒã·ã£ã«ãµããŒããããã¯ãŒã¯ãä»åŸçã
éèŠã«ãªã£ãŠãããã®ãšæãããããšããã§å²¡å±±åžã§ã¯å¹³æ6幎10æããã65æ³ä»¥äžã®è匱ãªé«éœ¢è
ã§ããã€èªåã§èª¿çãå°é£ãªå Žååã¯èª¿çã®æŽå©ãåŸãããªãå Žåã察象ãšãããäžäººæ®ããè人ç絊é£ãµãŒãã¹ä¿é²äºæ¥ãïŒçµŠé£ãµãŒãã¹ãšç¥ãïŒãå§ããããŠããããã®äºæ¥ã®äž»æšãšããŠçŽæ¥çã«ã¯ãèŠæŽè·é«éœ¢è
ã®é£ç掻å®å®ãæ é€ãã©ã³ã¹ã®è£è¶³ãšæ é€æ¹åã調çã®è² æ
軜æžã楜ãããé£äºã®æäŸçã«ããé«éœ¢è
ã®æ¥åžžç掻ã®æ¯æŽãç®çãšããŠããããŸãéæ¥çã«ã¯å°åãã©ã³ãã£ã¢ã®é€æãå°å亀æµãå®åŠç¢ºèªãå€ç¬æã®è§£æ¶ãç掻ãªãºã ã®ææ¡ãé
é£è
ã«ããå絊è
ã®ä¿å¥çŠç¥ããŒãºã®çºèŠåã³äœå®
ä¿å¥çŠç¥ãµãŒãã¹ãžã®ä»²ä»ãéããŠã®å°åçŠç¥ã®é«æãç®çãšãããã®ã§ããã絊é£ãµãŒãã¹ã®åœ¢æ
ã¯æïœéææ¥è¿ã®é±5æ¥éãæ¥ïŒé£æŒé£ãé
éããæ¯æ¥åãåºæ¬ãšããŠããããªããé
é£äœå¶ã¯ã調çæ¥è
ããé
é£æ ç¹æœèšãžç€ŸäŒçŠç¥åè°äŒè·å¡åã¯é
éé転æãé
éãããã®é
è²æ ç¹æœèšãããã©ã³ãã£ã¢é
é£ååå¡ïŒä»¥éããã©ã³ãã£ã¢ååå¡ãšç¥ãïŒãå絊è
å®
ãžé
é£ãè¡ããšããæ¹æ³ããšã£ãŠãããæ¬èª¿æ»ã§ã¯ãå°åã®ãã©ã³ãã£ã¢ååå¡ãå©çšäœå®
ã®é«éœ¢è
ã«æŒé£ãå±ãå§ããŠãïŒå¹Žåãçµéããå¹³æ8幎3ææç¹ã§èª¿æ»ãè¡ã£ããæ¬å ±åã®ç®çã¯ã絊é£ãµãŒãã¹åã³å絊è
-ãã©ã³ãã£ã¢ååå¡éã®ãµããŒãæåé¢ä¿ãé«éœ¢è
ã®SNWã粟ç¥çå¥åº·ã«å¯ŸããŠãã©ã®ãããªåœ±é¿ãåãŒããŠãããã«ã€ããŠãæ€èšãè¡ããã®ã§ãã
ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒãã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ã®ä»å ¥ç 究ã®èŠç¹ãšæ¹æ³è«
ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒãã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ãå¥åº·ã«è¯å®çãªå¹æãæã€ãšããç¥èŠã¯æ§ã
ã«ç¢ºèªããå ±åãããŠãããããããåºç€çç¥èŠã®æ¬¡æ®µéãšããŠãã©ã®ããã«ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒãã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ãæ¡å
ããã®ããšãã£ãç 究äžã®åããèãããããä»å
¥ã®å®è·µã¯ç·ããŠã³ãã¥ããã£ã»ã¡ã³ã¿ã«ãã«ã¹é åã§ã®é©çšäŸãå€ãããä»ã«ã瀟äŒçŠç¥ãå¥åº·å¿çãèšåºå¿çïŒå®¶æçæ³ãè¡åçæ³ãåŠççžè«ä»ïŒãªã©ã®è€æ°ã®é åã«æž¡ã£ãŠãããå¿çšç 究ã®ããéã¯åºããããããã®åºæ¬ççè«ãèæ¯ã«ãåŸæ¥ãã®é åã§ç®çãšãããããšïŒäŸãã°æ²»çãå¥åº·ã®å¢é²ãªã©ïŒãå¹æçã«éè¡ãããããä»å çãããã¯è£è¶³çã«ãã®ã¢ãããŒããåãå
¥ããããŠãããããã«ç€ŸäŒåŠçã»ç€ŸäŒå¿çåŠçãªèª¿æ»ãããä»å
¥ãžã®æ¹åæ§ã瀺ããç 究ãå ãããšãç 究ã¯çžåœæ°ã«ã®ãŒããä»å
¥ç 究ãåé¡ããŠã¿ããšããŸããããŸãã«ããœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒããç²åŸãããä»å
¥ãšãããœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ãæ¡å€§ãããä»å
¥ãããããã«æããããåŸè
ã¯ãããã¯ãŒã¯æ¡å€§ããµããŒãæºã®ç²åŸãšã¿ãªããããã°æœåšçãªãµããŒããç²åŸããããšãç®çãšããããããŠãã®æŽ»æ§åã«å¯Ÿããããã«äœããã®é¢ããããšããã©ããã§ãããããã¯ãŒã¯æç«ã®æ©äŒãæäŸãããä»å
¥ãšãããããã¯ãŒã¯æç«ããèœåãç²åŸãããä»å
¥ãåé¡ã§ããããåŸè
ã¯ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ã¹ãã«ã身ã«ã€ããããã§åºäŒãã®æ©äŒãæäŸããæ©äŒãçãããããèšç»ãããã¢ãããŒãã®åºæ¬ã¯ãæ¬äººãåãå·»ã察人é¢ä¿ã調æŽãããçŸå Žã§ã®ãã£ãŒã«ãå®éšã§ãããç 究é åããšã«çšããæ¹æ³è«ã枬å®ã»è©äŸ¡ã®æ¹æ³ãå®éšèšç»ãç®æšã䟡å€èŠ³ãªã©ãç°ãªãããã®åœ¢æ
ãã蚪åïŒäŸãã°Johnson,Howell and Molloy, 1993)ãé»è©±ïŒäŸãã°ãHeller, Thompson, Vlachos-Weber and Steffen, 1991)ãªã©ã®æ¥è§Šè¡çºãã¢ã¯ãã£ããã£åå ïŒäŸãã°Benum,Anstorp,Steffen and Sorensen, 1987ïŒãé¢ä¿åŒ·åã®æå°ïŒäŸãã°ãAttneave, 1990)ãã°ã«ãŒã圢æïŒäŸãã°Haley,Brown and Levine, 1987)ãªã©æ§ã
ã§ãããæŽå©å¯Ÿè±¡è
ã¯ãäœããã®æå³ã§å°é£ãªç¶æ³ã«é¥ã£ãŠããè
ã§ããœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒãã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ãäžè¶³ããããã¯çŸåšä»¥äžã«åŒ·åããå¿
èŠã®ããè
ã§ãããæœåšçãªåé¡ããé¡åšçãªåé¡ãŸã§ãå«ãŸãããåºç£åŸã®æ¯èŠªïŒäŸãã°Higgins,Schimoeller,Baranowski and Coladarci, 1993)ãé«éœ¢è
ïŒäŸãã°Clarke,Clarke and Jagger,1992)ãæ¯å家åºïŒäŸãã°Soehner,Zastowny,Hammond and Taylor 1988)ãå€ç¬æã®é«ãè
ïŒäŸãã°Andersson,1985)ãªã©ã§ããã°ã軜埮ãªå°é£ã軜æžããããã®æŽå©çä»å
¥ããªããã¯åé¡çºçã®å¯èœæ§ãæã€ãã€ãªã¹ã¯ãªå¯Ÿè±¡è
ãžã®äºé²çä»å
¥ã§ãããããããªãããªãããæ£è
ïŒäŸãã°Allegrante,MacKenzie,Robbins and Cornel,1991)ãæ²»çäžã®æ£è
ïŒäŸãã°Stephens,Roffman and Simpson,1944)ãªã©ã¯ãæ²»çã®äžç°ãšããŠåé¡è§£æ±ºçãªä»å
¥ãšãããããä»å
¥å¯Ÿè±¡ãšããŠæäœããã®ã¯ããã³ãã£ããªã¹ã¯ã®ããæ¬äººããªãã¡ãã¿ãŒã²ãããã®å Žåãããããã¯åšå²ã®ããµããŒã¿ãŒãã®å Žåããããåè
ã«ã¯ãã€ãªã¹ã¯ã®äººãæ£è
ãåŸè
ã«ã¯é害è
ã®ã¯ã©ã¹ã¡ã€ãïŒäŸãã°ãHaring and Breen,1992)ãé害è
ã®å®¶æïŒäŸãã°KirkhamãSchilling Norelius and Schinke,1986)ãä»è·è
ã§ãã家æïŒäŸãã°Toseland and Rossiter,1989)ãã¿ãŒã²ããã®å±
äœããå°åã®äœæ°ïŒäŸãã°Johnson,et al. 1993)ãªã©ãèãããã
A Note of Psychological Study on Family Care Givers for the Elderly
Load for caregiving is increasing as the number of elderly is increaing and their bedridden period is becoming longer. The load for caregiving should be shared by the entire society, but the fact is that actual load is on domestic caregivers. We carried out a survey on the load for caregiving from January to March, 1999. Questionnaires were delivered and collected from 239 home caregivers who have elderly over 65 years old. The average age of the caregivers were 65.0 years old. Our analyses indicate that the caregivers are exhausted mentaly and physically from the load, but they keep encouraging themselves with resposibility as families
A note of Psychological Study on Caregiver's Self-help Group
Research on the relation between relaxation and promotion factors of stresses from home caregiving revealed that the number of years as a member of caregivers group had positive effect against such stresses. In this study, we prepared questionnaires focused on psychological function of caregiver's self-help group. Survey sheets were mailed to 385 caregivers joinning in such groups, and 176 valid answers were collected from February to March, 2000. The average age of caregivers was 64.5 years old, and most of them are spouses and daughters-in-law in 3 to 4 people families. The average period as a member of a group is 4.2 years. They satisfied with the activities, and are willing to be continuing members. One third of them always or often come to the meetings, and they ask public service when they attend. Demand for knowledge and technique on caregiving is high, and the group fulfill most of the demand. The members are also willing to tell information to others
é«éœ¢å¥³æ§ã®ç€ŸäŒçæ¯æŽãããã¯ãŒã¯ç¹æ§ãšç²Ÿç¥çå¥åº·èª¿æ»ã®åºç€åæ(ãã®1)
çè
ãã¯ãå¹³æ7幎2æã«60æ³ä»¥äž80æ³æªæºã®å¥³æ§ã察象ã«ã岡山åžã«ãããŠç€ŸäŒçæ¯æŽãããã¯ãŒã¯ã®èª¿æ»ãå®æœãããïŒä»¥äžã§ã¯ããã®èª¿æ»ããé«éœ¢å¥³æ§èª¿æ»ããšåŒã¶ãïŒæ¬çš¿ã§ã¯ããã®èª¿æ»ã®æŠèŠã説æããåçŽéèšè¡šãæ瀺ããããããŠããã®åçŽéèšè¡šãæ€èšããããšããåŸãããç¥èŠã解説ãã
Motivation and Effects of the Acticities of Volunteers Heiping Elderly People
æ¬çš¿ã§ã¯ãæŽå©æŽ»åã§ã¯ãªããŠãããœãŒã·ã£ã«ãµããŒããã®ã亀æããéããã察人é¢ä¿ã®åœ¢æããšããæ çµã¿ã§èŠãŠããããœãŒã·ã£ã«ãµããŒãã®ç 究系èã«äœçœ®ã¥ããŠè©äŸ¡ããŠããããããŸãæäŸãµããŒãã®ã«ããŽãªãéãå°ãããæŽå©æäŸã®å®çžŸã®ã¿ãªããæŽå©æäŸã®æ欲ãèãããšã§ãããå¿ççãªåŽé¢ããã®ãµããŒãæåé¢ä¿ã®ææ¡ãè¡ããæŽå©å¯Ÿè±¡è
ãšã®ãµããŒã亀æã®çµæãã察人é¢ä¿ã®æ¬¡å
ã§ã¿ãããã«ã察象è
ãšã®é¢ããã®æ·±ããæŽå©ã«ããŽãªã®å€æ§ãã察象è
ãšã®é¢ä¿ã®æºè¶³åºŠã枬å®ããããµããŒãã®äº€æç¶æ³ãã€ããããã察象è
ããåŸããã®ãå°ããŠãæåã®ãã©ã³ã¹ãè©äŸ¡ãããåå åæ©ã«ã€ããŠã¯ããã©ã³ãã£ã¢æŽ»åãšãã£ãŠãå€æ§ãªãããæã
ã®äºå調æ»ããåŸãããäž»ãªå
容ãã«ããŒããŠèšå®ããããšãšããããã©ã³ãã£ã¢èªèº«ã«ãšã£ãŠã®æŽ»åã®æå³ãææ¡ããããã«ã¯ã掻åããåŸããã®ã掻åã®çµæžçè©äŸ¡ãç掻ã®æºè¶³åºŠã匵ãåãã掻åéå§åŸã®ç掻å®æã®å€åãªã©ãå°ããã察人é¢ä¿é¢ã«ãããå
å®ãæ³å®ããŠããããã¯ãŒã¯ãæ¡å€§ãããèŽããèãã
Suggesions for Archieving Symbiosis in an Aging SOciety(3): The Structure of Social Support Network of the Elderly in Japan
é«éœ¢è
ã®ãœãŒã·ã£ã«ã»ãµããŒãã»ãããã¯ãŒã¯ã«ãããæ§é çç¹æ§ãæ€èšãããéžæ人åç°¿ãã確ç«æ¯äŸæœåºæ³ãçšããŠã岡山åžå
ã®60ïœ80æ³é«éœ¢è
ãžã®èšªåé¢æ¥èª¿æ»ãè¡ãããã女æ§ã¯1994幎床ïŒ283éååãååç56.6%ïŒãç·æ§ã¯1996幎床ïŒ218éååãååç53.4%ïŒã®è³ªåçŽãžã®åçãåæãããããå
¥é¢æã®äžè©±ãåéãä»äºã®çžã®è«ãå¿é
äºãèããæ
°ããçå®å®
ã®äžè©±ãç©ãåãããæ£æ©ãé£äºã倧åã«æãããªã©ãå¯èœãªçžæããããã¯ãŒã¯æ§æå¡ãšãã人æ°ãšé¢ä¿ãªã©ãå°ããããããã¯ãŒã¯é¢é£é
ç®ãšããŠãçŸåšã®äººéé¢ä¿ãžã®æºè¶³åºŠãªã©ãå°ããããããã¯ãŒã¯äººæ°ã«ã¯æ§å¥ãå±
äœåœ¢æ
ã«ããå·®ã¯èŠãããªãã£ããã質çåŽé¢ã«ã¯å·®ãèªããããã女æ§ã¯ç·æ§ããæ¯èŒçãããã¯ãŒã¯è³æºã«æµãŸããŠãããç·æ§ãšç¬å±
ã®é«éœ¢è
ã¯ããµããŒããããã¯ãŒã¯ã®ç©æ¥µçãªéæãšç¶æãæãŸããããµããŒãã®æåé¢ä¿ã¯ç·ããŠäºæµçã§ãé«éœ¢è
ã¯ç€ŸäŒã®äžã§ãµããŒãäŸçµŠè
ãšããŠãæåŸ
ã§ãã
ãé«éœ¢å¥³æ§ã®ç€ŸäŒçæ¯æŽãããã¯ãŒã¯ç¹æ§ãšç²Ÿç¥çå¥åº·ãã®åºç€åæ(ãã®2)
çè
ãã¯ãå¹³æ7幎2æã«60æ³ä»¥äž80æ³æªæºã®å¥³æ§ã察象ã«ã岡山åžã«ãããŠç€ŸäŒçæ¯æŽãããã¯ãŒã¯ã®èª¿æ»ãå®æœãããïŒä»¥äžã§ã¯ããã®èª¿æ»ããé«éœ¢å¥³æ§èª¿æ»ããšåŒã¶ãïŒæ¬çš¿ã§ã¯ããã®èª¿æ»ã®æŠèŠã説æããåçŽéèšè¡šãæ瀺ããããããŠããã®åçŽéèšè¡šãæ€èšããããšããåŸãããç¥èŠã解説ãã
Game constitution in the recent student handball women competition ïŒ An analysis of the student woman higher rank team in 2007 and 2008ïŒ
This study was investigated that at examining the factor for winning with finding out
the tendency of a student woman handball game in recent years ïŒ
ãAnalysis was taken as the game of ïŒ teams of woman bests of the all Japan student
handball championship in the 2008 fiscal year in the 2007 fiscal yearïŒ
The result was as followsïŒ
ãâ In the student woman handball game of top class in recent yearsïŒ the number of the
goals was 26.6 pointsïŒ the number of shots was 48.7 timesïŒ and the number of times of
an attack was 67.9 timesïŒãIn the number of times of an attackïŒ it increased about 10
times per game from 15-year beforeïŒ and speedy game deployment was developedïŒ
ãâ¡ When it compared between a victory team and a loser teamïŒ the significant
difference was seen in the number of shots ïŒP< 0.05ïŒïŒ the number of the goals ïŒP<
0.01ïŒïŒ the number of mistakes ïŒP< 0.01ïŒïŒ the attack strike rate ïŒP< 0.01ïŒïŒ the shot
strike rateïŒ P< 0.01ïŒïŒ and the mistake rateïŒ P< 0.01ïŒïŒ
ã⢠The strike rate of the set play was 28.1% in the loser team 42.1% in the victory
teamïŒ MoreoverïŒ by the victory teamïŒ 23.2 %ïŒ in the loser teamïŒ it is 34.3 % and the
significant differenceïŒ P< 0.01ïŒ was seen about the rate of failure of the set play
- âŠ