8 research outputs found
Lost in translation: data integration tools meet the Semantic Web (experiences from the Ondex project)
More information is now being published in machine processable form on the
web and, as de-facto distributed knowledge bases are materializing, partly
encouraged by the vision of the Semantic Web, the focus is shifting from the
publication of this information to its consumption. Platforms for data
integration, visualization and analysis that are based on a graph
representation of information appear first candidates to be consumers of
web-based information that is readily expressible as graphs. The question is
whether the adoption of these platforms to information available on the
Semantic Web requires some adaptation of their data structures and semantics.
Ondex is a network-based data integration, analysis and visualization platform
which has been developed in a Life Sciences context. A number of features,
including semantic annotation via ontologies and an attention to provenance and
evidence, make this an ideal candidate to consume Semantic Web information, as
well as a prototype for the application of network analysis tools in this
context. By analyzing the Ondex data structure and its usage, we have found a
set of discrepancies and errors arising from the semantic mismatch between a
procedural approach to network analysis and the implications of a web-based
representation of information. We report in the paper on the simple methodology
that we have adopted to conduct such analysis, and on issues that we have found
which may be relevant for a range of similar platformsComment: Presented at DEIT, Data Engineering and Internet Technology, 2011
IEEE: CFP1113L-CD
Law, Environment, and the “Nondismal” Social Sciences
Over the past 30 years, the influence of economics over the study of environmental law and policy has expanded considerably, becoming in the process the predominant framework for analyzing regulations that address pollution, natural resource use, and other environmental issues. This review seeks to complement the expansion of economic reasoning and methodology within the field of environmental law and policy by identifying insights to be gleaned from various “nondismal” social sciences. In particular, three areas of inquiry are highlighted as illustrative of interdisciplinary work that might help to complement law and economics and, in some cases, compensate for it: the study of how human individuals perceive, judge, and decide; the observation and interpretation of how knowledge schemes are created, used, and regulated; and the analysis of how states and other actors coordinate through international and global regulatory regimes. The hope is to provide some examples of how environmental law and policy research can be improved by deeper and more diverse engagement with social science
The effect of EUSOMA certification on quality of breast cancer care
Aim of the study: The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) has fostered a voluntary certification process for breast units to establish minimum standards and ensure specialist multidisciplinary care. In the present study we assess the impact of EUSOMA certification for all breast units for which sufficient information was available before and after certification. Materials and methods: For 22 EUSOMA certified breast units data of 30,444 patients could be extracted from the EUSOMA database on the evolution of QI's before and after certification. Results: On the average of all units, the minimum standard of care was achieved for 12/13 QI's before and after EUSOMA certification (not met for DCIS receiving just one operation). There was a significant improvement of 5 QI's after certification. The proportion of patients with invasive cancer undergoing an axillary clearance containing >9 lymph nodes (91.5% vs 89.4%, p 0.003) and patients with invasive cancer having just 1 operation (83.1% vs 80.4%, p < 0.001) dropped, but remained above the minimum standard. The targeted standard of breast care was reached for the same 4/13 QI's before and after EUSOMA certification. Conclusion: Although the absolute effect of EUSOMA certification was modest it further increases standards of care and should be regarded as part of a process aiming for excellence. Dedicated units already provide a high level of care before certification, but continuous monitoring and audit remains of paramount importance as complete adherence to guidelines is difficult to achieve. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved