26 research outputs found
Real-life use of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients in centers in Austria, Switzerland and Germany.
Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a licensed therapy for use in melanoma patients of stage IIIB-IVM1a with injectable, unresectable metastatic lesions in Europe. Approval was based on the Oncovex Pivotal Trial in Melanoma study, which also included patients with distant metastases and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 40.5% and a complete response (CR) rate of 16.6%.
The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of melanoma patients treated with T-VEC in a real-life clinical setting.
Based on data from 10 melanoma centers in Austria, Switzerland and southern Germany, we conducted a retrospective chart review, which included 88 patients (44 male, 44 female) with a median age of 72 years (range 36-95 years) treated with T-VEC during the period from May 2016 to January 2020.
88 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for analysis. The ORR was 63.7%. 38 patients (43.2%) showed a CR, 18 (20.5%) had a partial response, 8 (9.1%) had stable disease and 24 (27.3%) patients had a progressive disease. The median treatment period was 19 weeks (range: 1-65), an average of 11 doses (range: 1-36) were applied. 39 (45.3%) patients developed adverse events, mostly mild, grade I (64.1%).
This real-life cohort treatment with T-VEC showed a high ORR and a large number of durable CRs
Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality
The introduction of digital radiography not only has revolutionized communication between radiologists and clinicians, but also has improved image quality and allowed for further reduction of patient exposure. However, digital radiography also poses risks, such as unnoticed increases in patient dose and suboptimum image processing that may lead to suppression of diagnostic information. Advanced processing techniques, such as temporal subtraction, dual-energy subtraction and computer-aided detection (CAD) will play an increasing role in the future and are all targeted to decrease the influence of distracting anatomic background structures and to ease the detection of focal and subtle lesions. This review summarizes the most recent technical developments with regard to new detector techniques, options for dose reduction and optimized image processing. It explains the meaning of the exposure indicator or the dose reference level as tools for the radiologist to control the dose. It also provides an overview over the multitude of studies conducted in recent years to evaluate the options of these new developments to realize the principle of ALARA. The focus of the review is hereby on adult applications, the relationship between dose and image quality and the differences between the various detector systems
New developments in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: update on current and emerging treatment options with a focus on vismodegib
Peter Koelblinger, Roland Lang, Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria Abstract: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer worldwide. Although most BCCs can be treated by relatively simple surgical or nonsurgical methods, some patients with BCC may eventually develop advanced disease which can either be locally destructive or even include metastatic spread. The present review summarizes the current literature on the treatment of both early and advanced BCC with a focus on the hedgehog inhibitor vismodegib which has become an integral part of the management of patients with advanced BCC since its regulatory approval in 2012. Keywords: basal cell carcinoma, treatment, PTCH1, hedgehog inhibitor 
Increased tumour cell PD-L1 expression, macrophage and dendritic cell infiltration characterise the tumour microenvironment of ulcerated primary melanomas
BACKGROUND:
Primary melanoma ulceration is an unfavourable prognostic factor included in current staging systems. Yet, the immunological and molecular alterations responsible for this adverse outcome have not been fully elucidated.
OBJECTIVES:
We aimed to identify immunological differences between ulcerated and non-ulcerated primary melanomas concerning both innate and adaptive immunity and to correlate these with clinical outcome.
METHODS:
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary melanomas from 112 patients (pts) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. The expression of various markers identifying tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells was evaluated semi-quantitatively by three independent investigators. Tumour-cell expression of programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1), transporter of antigen-processing 1 and the MxA protein was also analysed.
RESULTS:
Recurrence occurred in 21/56 pts (37.5%) with ulcerated vs. 14/56 pts (25.0%) with non-ulcerated tumours (p=0.15). Tumour ulceration was associated with more frequent development of brain metastasis (17.6 versus 3.6% of pts, p =0.015). Immunohistochemistry showed an association of ulceration with the presence of intratumoural CD68+ macrophages (p=0.028) as well as with increased numbers of intratumoural CD11c+ dendritic cells (p=0.014) and CD163+ macrophages (p=0.001). PD-L1 positivity (expression in >1% of tumour cells) was more frequent in ulcerated than non-ulcerated tumours (40 (72.7%) vs. 25 (44.6%), p=0.003). A positive correlation between intratumoural CD11c+ (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ: 0.42) and CD163+ (ρ: 0.31) cell count and frequency of tumour cell PD-L1 expression was detected.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our results confirm the adverse clinical outcome associated with primary melanoma ulceration, particularly concerning the risk of recurrence and subsequent development of brain metastases. The observed immunological differences suggest a conceivable role of increased intratumoural macrophage and dendritic cell counts associated with enhanced tumour cell PD-L1 expression potentially contributing to the immunosuppressive, growth-promoting microenvironment of ulcerated primary melanomas
The spectrum of cutaneous adverse events during encorafenib and binimetinib treatment in B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma‐mutated advanced melanoma
Background B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) inhibitor encorafenib alone and in combination with MEK inhibitor binimetinib improves survival in BRAF‐mutated melanoma patients. So far, the range of cutaneous adverse events has been characterized only for established BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitors (trametinib, cobimetinib). Objective The aim of this study was to investigate cutaneous adverse events emerging in melanoma patients treated with encorafenib and binimetinib. Methods Patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in clinical trials at the University Hospital of Zurich were identified. Frequency and features of cutaneous adverse events as well as their management were assessed based on the prospectively collected clinical and histopathological data. The events emerging during encorafenib and/or binimetinib therapy were compared to other BRAF and MEK inhibitors at the institution and in the literature. Results The most frequent cutaneous adverse events observed in patients treated with encorafenib alone (n = 24) were palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (54%), palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (58%) and alopecia (46%). Drug‐induced papulopustular eruptions prevailed in patients with binimetinib monotherapy (n = 25). The most frequent cutaneous adverse events in patients treated with encorafenib/binimetinib (n = 49) were palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (10%). Conclusion Compared to data published for established BRAFi, encorafenib monotherapy showed less hyperproliferative cutaneous adverse events. In contrast, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia seem to occur more often. The combination of encorafenib and binimetinib is well tolerated and induces few cutaneous adverse events