Clinical relevance of in vitro drug resistance testing in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The state of the art

Nowadays about two‐thirds of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be cured with chemotherapy, but one‐third die from the disease. The clinical response of leukemic cells to chemotherapy is roughly due to two factors: the effective drug levels reaching the cells and the resistance of these cells to the drugs. The clinical value of cellular drug resistance in children with ALL is not known. We developed an in vitro assay to study drug resistance in these children. In this article, the main results obtained with this MTT assay on samples from 137 children with ALL are summarized: (1) patients whose cells are resistant to several drugs at initial diagnosis have a poor prognosis; (2) relapsed leukemias show a considerable drug resistance which might partly explain the poor prognosis. Relapsed cases differ in their type and degree of resistance; (3) the poor outcome of high risk groups as defined by age and immunophenotype can partly be explained by specific patterns of drug resistance; (4) P‐glycoprotein‐mediated multidrug resistance is not an important cause of resistance in childhood ALL; and (5) no relation exists between the activities of the purine enzymes HGPRT, 5′NT, ADA, and PNP and drug resistance in childhood ALL. The conclusion is that in vitro drug resistance data have clinical relevance and can be used to develop more effective and less toxic treatment strategies in childhood ALL. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc

In vitro cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone, daunorubicin and doxorubicin in untreated childhood acute leukemia

Mitoxantrone (MIT) has not been studied as a single agent in children with untreated leukemia. The antileukemic activity of MIT in these patients and its activity in relation to clinical and cell biological features is unknown. We studied the in vitro cytotoxicity of MIT, daunorubicin (DNR) and doxorubicin (DOX) in untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=131) and acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (ANLL, n=20) samples, using the MTT assay. There were marked interindividual differences in resistance to all three drugs. A strong, significant cross-resistance was found in ALL between MIT, DNR and DOX. ALL samples of the T-lineage, a prognostically unfavorable immunophenotype, however, were significantly more resistant to DNR and DOX, but not to MIT, than common or pre-B ALL samples. ALL cells from children with a prognostically unfavorable age at diagnosis, especially those < 2 years, showed a relative resistance to all three drugs compared to the intermediate age-group. This was found within all patients, but also within the common or pre-B ALL cases only. Sex, white blood cell count, or FAB type was not related to in vitro drug resistance. None of the three drugs showed an overall preferential activity in ALL or ANLL. We conclude that the in vitro antileukemic activity of MIT, DNR and DOX is related to certain clinical and cell biological features. There were no major differences between the three drugs in antileukemic activity, except that T-ALL samples were more resistant than common or pre-B ALL samples to DNR and DOX, while MIT was equally active in these two immunophenotypes

In vitro cellular drug resistance in children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Cellular drug resistance is thought to be an important cause of the poor prognosis for children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but it is unknown when, to which drugs, and to what extent resistance is present. We determined in vitro resistance to 13 drugs with the MTT assay. Compared with 141 children with initial ALL, cells from 137 children with relapsed ALL were significantly more resistant to glucocorticoids, L-asparaginase, anthracyclines, and thiopurines, but not to vinca-alkaloids, cytarabine, ifosfamide, and epipodophyllotoxins. Relapsed ALL cells expressed the highest level of resistance to glucocorticoids, with a median level 357- and >24-fold more resistant to prednisolone and dexamethasone, respectively, than initial ALL cells, whereas the resistance ratios for the other drugs differed from 0.8- to 1.9-fold. Intraindividual comparisons between initial and relapsed samples from 16 children with ALL showed that both de novo and acquired drug resistance were involved. Specific in vitro drug-resistance profiles were associated with high-risk relapsed ALL groups. In vitro drug resistance was also related to the clinical response to chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory childhood ALL. We conclude that drug resistance may explain the poor prognosis for children with relapsed/refractory ALL. These data may be helpful to design alternative treatment regimens for relapsed childhood ALL