42 research outputs found
Protein metabolism in the pectoralis muscle and liver of hibernating bats, Eptesicus fuscus
Seasonal variations in protein metabolism of the pectoralis muscle and liver of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus , are examined in relation to seasonal changes in physiological status. A technique is described for the determination of protein synthetic rates in vivo in animals too small for conventional methods. The results indicate no detectable rates of protein synthesis in hibernating bats during torpor bouts (Table 2). Rates of synthesis in hibernating bats during periods of arousal are comparable to those of active summer bats (Table 2), despite the fact that the hibernating bats had not eaten in over 2 months. Rates of protein degradation were calculated from the rate of urea formation in torpid bats (Figs. 4, 5), the overall loss of pectoralis muscle and liver protein mass during hibernation (Table 3), the proportion of the total time of hibernation spent in torpor and arousal (Table 1), and the observed rates of protein synthesis (Table 2). These estimates (Table 4) indicate negligible rates of protein degradation in torpid bats. However, protein degradation during periodic arousals is comparable to that of summer bats after an overnight fast. These findings are consistent with earlier observations suggesting that significant gluconeogenesis from tissue protein occurs during spontaneous arousals from hibernation.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47129/1/360_2004_Article_BF00689738.pd
[The urinary hydroxyproline-creatinine ratio, in random samples, in normal children and pituitary dwarfs]
Respiratory assistance: A review of techniques, rationale, and problems with a glimpse at the future
The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment.
The ecosystem services concept is used to make explicit the diverse benefits ecosystems provide to people, with the goal of improving assessment and, ultimately, decision-making. Alongside material benefits such as natural resources (e.g., clean water, timber), this concept includes-through the 'cultural' category of ecosystem services-diverse non-material benefits that people obtain through interactions with ecosystems (e.g., spiritual inspiration, cultural identity, recreation). Despite the longstanding focus of ecosystem services research on measurement, most cultural ecosystem services have defined measurement and inclusion alongside other more 'material' services. This gap in measurement of cultural ecosystem services is a product of several perceived problems, some of which are not real problems and some of which can be mitigated or even solved without undue difficulty. Because of the fractured nature of the literature, these problems continue to plague the discussion of cultural services. In this paper we discuss several such problems, which although they have been addressed singly, have not been brought together in a single discussion. There is a need for a single, accessible treatment of the importance and feasibility of integrating cultural ecosystem services alongside others
Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement
A focus on ecosystem services (ES) is seen as a means for improving decisionmaking. In the research to date, the valuation of the material contributions of ecosystems to human well-being has been emphasized, with less attention to important cultural ES and nonmaterial values. This gap persists because there is no commonly accepted framework for eliciting less tangible values, characterizing their changes, and including them alongside other services in decisionmaking. Here, we develop such a framework for ES research and practice, addressing three challenges: (1) Nonmaterial values are ill suited to characterization using monetary methods; (2) it is difficult to unequivocally link particular changes in socioecological systems to particular changes in cultural benefits; and (3) cultural benefits are associated with many services, not just cultural ES. There is no magic bullet, but our framework may facilitate fuller and more socially acceptable integrations of ES information into planning and management. © 2012 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved