20 research outputs found

    Vom Eigensinn der Kunst : Bamberger Hegelwoche 2004

    Get PDF
    Vom Eigensinn der Kunst : Bamberger Hegelwoche 2004 „Echte Kunst ist eigensinnig.“ Dieser Ansicht war schon Ludwig van Beethoven. Kunst ist ein Teil und Spiegel der Kultur, auch in unserer modernen Welt. In einer freiheitlichen Gesellschaft entwickeln sich Menschen, einzelne Branchen und ganze Kulturbereiche nach je eigenen Zielen und Regeln. So sucht auch die Kunst der Moderne nach spezifisch kĂŒnstlerischen Wegen, die nur sie selbst als Kunst gehen kann. Sie hat ihren Eigensinn, der sich nur dem erschließt, der ihre Wege mitgeht. Das Publikum erlebt zeitgenössische Kunst weithin als provokant und eigensinnig. Man will das Kunstwerk verstehen, seinen Sinn erschließen. Die Kunst aber antwortet wiederum durch ihre Kunstwerke. Ob VerstĂ€ndigung an dieser Stelle möglich ist, dieser Frage ist die diesjĂ€hrige Hegelwoche an der UniversitĂ€t Bamberg gewidmet

    Senza un altrove

    No full text
    In this interview, Ruth KlĂŒger, writer and survivor of Auschwitz, speaks of the wound of who, once alive outside the lager, has felt a “feeling of rejection” by the world that she thought it would have accepted her – as if the fault of the executioners had contaminated the victims. A separation that the survivor will live for all her life, both because, as a matter of fact, she feels to have a “double citizenship” between the alive and the dead – such that all in a sudden the normality breaks down and it gives way to the “old world” and the sensation that anything can be subtracted away – and because the witnesses, after having been rejected, they have turned into a generation of martyrs, object of a worship that can easily turn into nausea. However, the reflection on the human conditions cannot do away with the identification with what is acknowledged as similar, and for that reason a proximity is necessary

    Senza un altrove

    No full text
    In this interview, Ruth KlĂŒger, writer and survivor of Auschwitz, speaks of the wound of who, once alive outside the lager, has felt a “feeling of rejection” by the world that she thought it would have accepted her – as if the fault of the executioners had contaminated the victims. A separation that the survivor will live for all her life, both because, as a matter of fact, she feels to have a “double citizenship” between the alive and the dead – such that all in a sudden the normality breaks down and it gives way to the “old world” and the sensation that anything can be subtracted away – and because the witnesses, after having been rejected, they have turned into a generation of martyrs, object of a worship that can easily turn into nausea. However, the reflection on the human conditions cannot do away with the identification with what is acknowledged as similar, and for that reason a proximity is necessary

    il paradosso del testimone

    No full text
    Visti come documenti o fonti su cui procedere a costruire un edificio loro non piĂč abitabile o, per contro, sacralizzati da un ascolto religioso e impolitico che nutre una metafisica di Auschwitz, i testimoni sono diventati una figura di paradosso capace di dirci qualcosa su di noi, sulle retoriche e i cortocircuiti con cui pensiamo l’esperienza della Shoah, la sua possibilitĂ  di essere narrata e il suo farsi storia. La Shoah, scrive Georges Bensoussan citando Kafka, Ăš «la mannaia che spezza il mare di ghiaccio che c’ù dentro di noi». Tanto lo specialismo quanto la convinzione di poter pensare “oltre” eludono il mare di ghiaccio, ci proteggono dal dolore dello sguardo aperto, evitano di farci sentire parte in causa. Ma il sopravvissuto, afferma Imre KertĂ©sz, «Ú solo portatore delle piĂč estreme condizioni dell’uomo dei nostri giorni». PuĂČ esserci etica, senza un rispetto di quell’estremo da cui parla la testimonianza? È possibile inquadrare storicamente la Shoah e mantenere il senso della sua assolutezza? È possibile farne un’estetica nutrita di compiacimenti filosofici e letterari, senza naufragare nell’osceno? PiĂč che cercare statuti della testimonianza o provare a definire “chi ù” il testimone, questo numero propone un rovesciamento: chi siamo noi, visti attraverso gli occhi del testimone
    corecore