67 research outputs found
RiPLE: Recommendation in Peer-Learning Environments Based on Knowledge Gaps and Interests
Various forms of Peer-Learning Environments are increasingly being used in
post-secondary education, often to help build repositories of student generated
learning objects. However, large classes can result in an extensive repository,
which can make it more challenging for students to search for suitable objects
that both reflect their interests and address their knowledge gaps. Recommender
Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (RecSysTEL) offer a potential solution
to this problem by providing sophisticated filtering techniques to help
students to find the resources that they need in a timely manner. Here, a new
RecSysTEL for Recommendation in Peer-Learning Environments (RiPLE) is
presented. The approach uses a collaborative filtering algorithm based upon
matrix factorization to create personalized recommendations for individual
students that address their interests and their current knowledge gaps. The
approach is validated using both synthetic and real data sets. The results are
promising, indicating RiPLE is able to provide sensible personalized
recommendations for both regular and cold-start users under reasonable
assumptions about parameters and user behavior.Comment: 25 pages, 7 figures. The paper is accepted for publication in the
Journal of Educational Data Minin
Preparation and Measurement in Quantum Memory Models
Quantum Cognition has delivered a number of models for semantic memory, but
to date these have tended to assume pure states and projective measurement.
Here we relax these assumptions. A quantum inspired model of human word
association experiments will be extended using a density matrix representation
of human memory and a POVM based upon non-ideal measurements. Our formulation
allows for a consideration of key terms like measurement and contextuality
within a rigorous modern approach. This approach both provides new conceptual
advances and suggests new experimental protocols.Comment: published in Journal of Mathematical Psycholog
A probabilistic framework for analysing the compositionality of conceptual combinations
Conceptual combination performs a fundamental role in creating the broad
range of compound phrases utilised in everyday language. This article provides
a novel probabilistic framework for assessing whether the semantics of conceptual
combinations are compositional, and so can be considered as a function of
the semantics of the constituent concepts, or not. While the systematicity and
productivity of language provide a strong argument in favor of assuming compositionality,
this very assumption is still regularly questioned in both cognitive
science and philosophy. Additionally, the principle of semantic compositionality
is underspecified, which means that notions of both "strong" and "weak"
compositionality appear in the literature. Rather than adjudicating between
different grades of compositionality, the framework presented here contributes
formal methods for determining a clear dividing line between compositional and
non-compositional semantics. In addition, we suggest that the distinction between
these is contextually sensitive. Compositionality is equated with a joint probability distribution modeling how the constituent concepts in the combination
are interpreted. Marginal selectivity is introduced as a pivotal probabilistic
constraint for the application of the Bell/CH and CHSH systems of inequalities.
Non-compositionality is equated with a failure of marginal selectivity, or violation
of either system of inequalities in the presence of marginal selectivity. This
means that the conceptual combination cannot be modeled in a joint probability
distribution, the variables of which correspond to how the constituent concepts
are being interpreted. The formal analysis methods are demonstrated by applying
them to an empirical illustration of twenty-four non-lexicalised conceptual
combinations
Nonseparability of Shared Intentionality
According to recent studies in developmental psychology and neuroscience, symbolic language is essentially intersubjective. Empathetically relating to others renders possible the acquisition of linguistic constructs. Intersubjectivity develops in early ontogenetic life when interactions between mother and infant mutually shape their relatedness. Empirical findings suggest that the shared attention and intention involved in those interactions is sustained as it becomes internalized and embodied. Symbolic language is derivative and emerges from shared intentionality. In this paper, we present a formalization of shared intentionality based upon a quantum approach. From a phenomenological viewpoint, we investigate the nonseparable, dynamic and sustainable nature of social cognition and evaluate the appropriateness of quantum interaction for modelling intersubjectivity
- …