Study on international cooperation in the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions

The objective of this study is to provide a clear view and comprehensive analysis of the structure and results of third countries’ involvement in the MSCA under FP7 and Horizon 2020, covering both inward and outward mobility of researcher. The study also addresses the impacts of international cooperation in the MSCA under Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) and the predecessor programme (Marie Curie Actions) under the FP7 People Specific Programme (2007-2013). The findings of the study are expected to feed into the final evaluation of H2020, but in particular into the preparation for the future international dimension of the MSCA under Horizon Europe. Before this study, only anecdotal evidence was available for understanding the reasons and factors influencing the involvement of third countries in the MSCA. In addition, there was no comprehensive qualitative or quantitative assessment, which would allow an informed decision to be taken as to which cooperation should be reinforced to ensure more effective brain circulation. This study provides the first in-depth analysis by taking stock of the structure and impacts of international cooperation within the MSCA. The outcomes of the study and its recommendations will allow the European Commission to better decide on the focus, funding streams and rules regarding third country involvement in the MSCA. Furthermore, the research conducted will help to look beyond the MSCA and embed the MSCA in the wider context of European R&I international cooperation policies. The study concludes that the programme is and will remain bottom-up, but at the same time efforts should be made to better align it with the EU external policy objectives, given its strong international dimension and the growing role of science diplomacy in foreign policies and strategies. As an overarching line of action, the study therefore recommends that MSCA cooperation issues be systematically addressed during formal S&T policy dialogues held with national authorities from third countries or regional fora, and that the results of these discussions be reflected in corresponding bilateral and regional cooperation roadmaps. The study provides 13 detailed recommendations that should be implemented as part of this overarching framework