26 research outputs found
The impact of a simplified documentation method for the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) on clinician utilization.
Insurance company denial of payment and enforced changes in the type and dose of opioid analgesics for patients with cancer pain
Awareness and interest in cannabis use for cancer management among cancer survivors
Abstract Background We examined the awareness, interest, and information sources relating to cannabis use for cancer management (including management of cancer symptoms and treatmentârelated side effects) and determined factors associated with cancer survivors' awareness and interest in learning about cannabis use for cancer management. Methods This was a crossâsectional study of adult cancer survivors (Nâ=â1886) receiving treatment at a comprehensive cancer center. Weighted prevalence and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results Among cancer survivors, 88% were aware and 60% were interested in learning about cannabis use for cancer management. Common sources of information to learn about cannabis use for cancer management were cancer doctors/nurses (82%), other patients with cancer (27%), websites/blogs (26%), marijuana stores (20%), and family/friends (18%). The odds of being aware of cannabis use for cancer management was lower among male compared to female survivors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41â0.90), nonâHispanic Blacks compared to nonâHispanic Whites (AOR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21â0.62), and survivors who do not support the legalization of cannabis for medical use compared to those who do (AOR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.04â0.23). On the other hand, the odds of being interested in cannabis use for cancer management was higher among nonâHispanic Blacks compared to nonâHispanic Whites (AOR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.04â2.62), and among cancer survivors actively undergoing cancer treatment compared to patients on nonâactive treatment (AOR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.74â2.91). Conclusion Awareness of cannabis use for cancer management is high within the cancer survivor population. Results indicated health care providers are leading information source and should receive continued medical education on cannabisâspecific guidelines. Similarly, tailored educational interventions are needed to guide survivors on the benefits and risks of cannabis use for cancer management
Development of a Question Prompt Sheet for Cancer Patients Receiving Outpatient Palliative Care
The routine use of the Edmonton classification system for cancer pain in an outpatient supportive care center.
Integration of a Mandatory Palliative Care Education Into Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Training in a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A Survey of Hematology Oncology Fellows
Patient perception of physician compassion after a more optimistic vs a less optimistic message: A randomized clinical trial
IMPORTANCE: Information regarding treatment options and prognosis is essential for patient decision making. Patient perception of physicians as being less compassionate when they deliver bad news might be a contributor to physicians' reluctance in delivering these types of communication. OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' perception of physician compassion after watching video vignettes of 2 physicians conveying a more optimistic vs a less optimistic message, determine patients' physician preference after watching both videos, and establish demographic and clinical predictors of compassion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial at an outpatient supportive care center in a cancer center in Houston, Texas, including English-speaking adult patients with advanced cancer who were able to understand the nature of the study and complete the consent process. Actors and patients were blinded to the purpose of the study. Investigators were blinded to the videos observed by the patient. INTERVENTION: One hundred patients were randomized to observe 2 standardized, roughly 4-minute videos depicting a physician discussing treatment information (more optimistic message vs less optimistic message) with a patient with advanced cancer. Both physicians made an identical number of empathetic statements (5) and displayed identical posture. After viewing each video, patients completed assessments including the Physician Compassion Questionnaire (0 = best, 50 = worst). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' perception of physician compassion after being exposed to a more optimistic vs an equally empathetic but less optimistic message. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly better compassion scores after watching the more optimistic video as compared with the less optimistic video (median [interquartile range], 15 [5-23] vs 23 [10-31]; P < .001). There was a sequence effect favoring the second video on both compassion scores (P < .001) and physician preference (P < .001). Higher perception of compassion was found to be associated with greater trust in the medical profession independent of message type: 63 patients observing the more optimistic message ranked the physician as trustworthy vs 39 after the less optimistic message (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients perceived a higher level of compassion and preferred physicians who provided a more optimistic message. More research is needed in structuring less optimistic message content to support health care professionals in delivering less optimistic news. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357108