Cardiac arrest before repair or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation does not increase the mortality rate associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Despite recent advances in the management of high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), mortality remains high. Deaths occur later because infants with inadequate pulmonary parenchyma are treated aggressively but eventually succumb to respiratory failure. In an attempt to identify absolute predictors of mortality the authors examined retrospectively their experience with CDH to determine if cardiac arrest before repair or initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) invariably increased mortality. The authors reviewed the charts of 119 infants who had high-risk CDH treated between 1981 and 1994. They were divided into two groups: those that suffered cardiopulmonary arrest (CA, n = 21) before CDH repair or ECMO cannulation; and those that did not (NCA, N = 98). The authors compared mortality rate, ventilatory parameters, duration of, and complications on ECMO, as well as length of hospitalization between groups. Twenty-one infants suffered CA before initiation of ECMO support or CDH repair. Three infants (14%) suffered CA before arrival at our institution; seven (33%) after, and 11 (53%) both before and after arrival. There was no difference between the CA and NCA groups in terms of birth weight, gestational age, race and gender mix, or pregnancy and delivery complications. Five-minute Apgar scores were significantly lower in the CA group compared with the NCA group (4.6 v 5.7, P = .04). The CA group also had significantly worse “best postductal” blood gas and ventilatory parameters. There was no significant difference in length of hospitalization, time from admission to ECMO cannulation or CDH repair, or incidence of complications while on ECMO between the two groups. CA cases were more likely to require ECMO support (76% v 48%, P = .02) and to stay on ECMO for a more prolonged period than NCA cases (5.8 v 3.8 days, P = NS). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between CA and NCA cases (43% v 51%, P = NS). Cardiopulmonary arrest before repair of CDH or ECMO cannulation is not a univariate independent predictor of mortality and therefore should not preclude these highrisk infants from maximum intensive care therapy, including ECMO cannulation

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis

Purpose: There is persistent controversy regarding the optimal surgical therapy for children with appendicitis. We have recently adopted laparoscopic appendectomy in lieu of the open technique for children with perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy would be as effective as open appendectomy in preventing postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of children admitted to our hospital over a 5-year period with the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the operative approach: laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy. Demographic data, duration of presenting symptoms, initial white blood cell (WBC) count, length of stay, and complications were abstracted. Data were compared using appropriate statistical analyses. Results: There was no difference between the laparoscopic (n = 43) and open (n = 77) groups with respect to gender, duration of presenting symptoms, initial WBC, or length of stay. However, patients in the laparoscopic group had a significantly lower complication rate than those in the open group (6/43 vs. 23/77, P = 0.05). Infectious complications were no different between groups. Patients in the laparoscopic group tended to be older than patients in the open group (10.6 ± 3.3 years vs. 8.5 ± 4.1 years, P = 0.003). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis has the same infectious complication rate and a lower overall complication rate than open appendectomy. A prospective study with standardized postoperative care would be needed to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis is the treatment of choice, but until then it remains an attractive alternative. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc