Cohesin cleavage is insufficient for centriole disengagement in Drosophila

Medical Research Council; Wellcome Trust; European Research Council

The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules

Sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for mitosis, is mediated by a multi-subunit protein complex called cohesin whose Scc1, Smc1, and Smc3 subunits form a tripartite ring structure. It has been proposed that cohesin holds sister DNAs together by trapping them inside its ring. To test this, we used site-specific cross-linking to create chemical connections at the three interfaces between the ring’s three constituent polypeptides, thereby creating covalently closed cohesin rings. As predicted by the ring entrapment model, this procedure produces dimeric DNA/cohesin structures that are resistant to protein denaturation. We conclude that cohesin rings concatenate individual sister minichromosome DNAs

Evolution of condensin and cohesin complexes driven by replacement of Kite by Hawk proteins

Mitotic chromosome condensation, sister chromatid cohesion, and higher order folding of interphase chromatin are mediated by condensin and cohesin, eukaryotic members of the SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes)–kleisin protein family. Other members facilitate chromosome segregation in bacteria [1]. A hallmark of these complexes is the binding of the two ends of a kleisin subunit to the apices of V-shaped Smc dimers, creating a tripartite ring capable of entrapping DNA (Figure 1A). In addition to creating rings, kleisins recruit regulatory subunits. One family of regulators, namely Kite dimers (Kleisin interacting winged-helix tandem elements), interact with Smc–kleisin rings from bacteria, archaea and the eukaryotic Smc5-6 complex, but not with either condensin or cohesin [2]. These instead possess proteins containing HEAT (Huntingtin/EF3/PP2A/Tor1) repeat domains whose origin and distribution have not yet been characterized. Using a combination of profile Hidden Markov Model (HMM)-based homology searches, network analysis and structural alignments, we identify a common origin for these regulators, for which we propose the name Hawks, i.e. HEAT proteins associated with kleisins

Sister chromatid cohesion establishment during DNA replication termination

Newly copied sister chromatids are tethered together by the cohesin complex, but how sister chromatid cohesion is coordinated with DNA replication is poorly understood. Prevailing models suggest cohesin complexes, bound to DNA before replication, remain behind the advancing replication fork to keep sister chromatids together. By visualizing single replication forks colliding with pre-loaded cohesin complexes, we find that the replisome instead pushes cohesin to where a converging replisome is met. While the converging replisomes are removed during DNA replication termination, cohesin remains on nascent DNA and provides cohesion. Additionally, we show that CMG disassembly during replication termination is vital for proper cohesion in budding yeast. Together, our results support a new model where sister chromatid cohesion is established during DNA replication termination

Scc2 counteracts a Wapl-independent mechanism that releases cohesin from chromosomes during G1

Acknowledgements Maria Demidova conducted initial experiments that this study expanded on. We are grateful to Tomo Tanaka and Seiji Tanaka for supplying reagents. We thank all members of the Nasmyth group for valuable discussions, technical assistance and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award, Grant Ref 107935/Z/15/Z and Cancer Research UK Programme Grant, Grant Ref 26747 to KN. BH is funded by (202062/Z/16/Z).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Transport of DNA within cohesin involves clamping on top of engaged heads by Scc2 and entrapment within the ring by Scc3.

In addition to extruding DNA loops, cohesin entraps within its SMC-kleisin ring (S-K) individual DNAs during G1 and sister DNAs during S-phase. All three activities require related hook-shaped proteins called Scc2 and Scc3. Using thiol-specific crosslinking we provide rigorous proof of entrapment activity in vitro. Scc2 alone promotes entrapment of DNAs in the E-S and E-K compartments, between ATP-bound engaged heads and the SMC hinge and associated kleisin, respectively. This does not require ATP hydrolysis nor is it accompanied by entrapment within S-K rings, which is a slower process requiring Scc3. Cryo-EM reveals that DNAs transported into E-S/E-K compartments are 'clamped' in a sub-compartment created by Scc2's association with engaged heads whose coiled coils are folded around their elbow. We suggest that clamping may be a recurrent feature of cohesin complexes active in loop extrusion and that this conformation precedes the S-K entrapment required for sister chromatid cohesion

Cohesin Releases DNA through Asymmetric ATPase-Driven Ring Opening

Cohesin stably holds together the sister chromatids from S phase until mitosis. To do so, cohesin must be protected against its cellular antagonist Wapl. Eco1 acetylates cohesin's Smc3 subunit, which locks together the sister DNAs. We used yeast genetics to dissect how Wapl drives cohesin from chromatin and identified mutants of cohesin that are impaired in ATPase activity but remarkably confer robust cohesion that bypasses the need for the cohesin protectors Eco1 in yeast and Sororin in human cells. We uncover a functional asymmetry within the heart of cohesin's highly conserved ABC-like ATPase machinery and find that both ATPase sites contribute to DNA loading, whereas DNA release is controlled specifically by one site. We propose that Smc3 acetylation locks cohesin rings around the sister chromatids by counteracting an activity associated with one of cohesin's two ATPase sites. Tight regulation of DNA entrapment and release by the cohesin complex is crucial for its multiple cellular functions. Elbatsh et al. find that cohesin's release from DNA requires an activity associated with one of its ATPase sites, whereas both sites control cohesin's loading onto DNA

Ipl1/aurora kinase suppresses S-CDK-driven spindle formation during prophase I to ensure chromosome integrity during meiosis

Cells coordinate spindle formation with DNA repair and morphological modifications to chromosomes prior to their segregation to prevent cell division with damaged chromosomes. Here we uncover a novel and unexpected role for Aurora kinase in preventing the formation of spindles by Clb5-CDK (S-CDK) during meiotic prophase I and when the DDR is active in budding yeast. This is critical since S-CDK is essential for replication during premeiotic S-phase as well as double-strand break induction that facilitates meiotic recombination and, ultimately, chromosome segregation. Furthermore, we find that depletion of Cdc5 polo kinase activity delays spindle formation in DDR-arrested cells and that ectopic expression of Cdc5 in prophase I enhances spindle formation, when Ipl1 is depleted. Our findings establish a new paradigm for Aurora kinase function in both negative and positive regulation of spindle dynamics

Rapid induction of p21WAF1 but delayed down-regulation of Cdc25A in the TGF-β-induced cell cycle arrest of gastric carcinoma cells

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is a multifunctional polypeptide that inhibits cellular proliferation in most epithelial cells. cdk4 and several cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors (p15(INK4B), p21(WAFI/Cip1) and p27(Kip1)) have been implicated in the TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest. More recently, down-regulation of Cdc25A, a cdk activator, was additionally suggested as a mechanism underlying growth inhibition by TGF-beta. The existence of diverse cellular mediators, of TGF-beta, however, raises the question of whether their involvement might occur in a redundant manner or coordinately in a certain cell type. Using two TGF-beta-sensitive gastric carcinoma cell lines (SNU-16 and -620), we addressed the contributory roles of several cdk inhibitors, and of cdk4 and Cdc25A, in TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest by comparing their temporal expression pattern in response to TGF-beta. Among the cdk inhibitors examined, p21 mRNA was most rapidly (in less than 1 h) and prominently induced by TGF-beta. In contrast, p15 mRNA was more slowly induced than p21 in SNU-620: cells, and not expressed in SNU-16 cells harbouring homozygous deletion of p15. Western blotting results confirmed the rapid increase of p21 while opposite patterns of p27 expression were observed in the two cell lines. The down-regulation of Cdc25A mRNA occurred, but was more delayed than that of p15 or p21. Until G1 arrest was established, changes in the protein levels of both Cdc25A and cdk4 were marginal. Co-immunoprecipitation with anti-cdk4 antibody showed that induced p21 associates with cdk4, and that its kinase activity is reduced by TGF-beta, which kinetically correlates closely with G1 arrest following TGF-beta treatment of both cell lines. These results suggest that in certain human epithelial cells, p21 may play an early role in TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest, and its cooperation with other cdk inhibitors is different depending on cell type. Delayed down-regulation of Cdc25A and cdk4 may contribute to cell adaptation to the quiescent state in the two gastric carcinoma cell lines studied