82 research outputs found

    The Russian Invasion in the Context of Post-Bolotnaya Authoritarian Consolidation

    Get PDF
    The Russian invasion of Ukraine came as a shock to many observers, including the author of this article. In terms of domestic political dynamics, the invasion is inscribed in - and has drastically intensified - the logic of post-Bolotnaya authoritarian consolidation, as notably seen in the performative staging of Vladimir Putin's decision to invade as a response to demands supposedly present in wider society. A key part of this is the co-optation of the Greater Russia nationalism, represented by the likes of Igor Strelkov, as a driving force behind the 2014 Russian intervention in the Donbas

    The populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): an extended Essex School perspective

    Get PDF
    This paper seeks to draw on the tools of Ernesto Laclauā€™s theory of discourse, hegemony and populism as well as recent Essex School work on populism to examine the discourse of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and, in the process, come closer to a more systematic understanding of nature and limits of 'right-wing' populism as well as the interplay and distinction between populist and non-populist discursive logics more generally. The paper situates itself in the context of existing Essex School work that has distinguished populism from institutionalism - and, more recently, from nationalism - in terms of either the length of the equivalential chain or the centrality of ā€œthe peopleā€ as nodal point in addition to the degree of antagonistic division between ā€œpeopleā€ and ā€œpower.ā€ Building on this latter strand in the recent work of Yannis Stavrakakis and others, this paper proposes a formal distinction between 'populism' and 'reductionism' as internal to Laclauā€™s theory of populism. Reductionism, it is argued, tends to reduce ā€œthe peopleā€ onto a differential particularity that sets 'a priori' limits on the equivalential chain as opposed to constructing it as a 'tendentially empty signifier' attached to an 'open-ended' chain - producing a tendential 'closure' of the equivalential chain and thus undercutting the primacy of the logic of equivalence that is fundamental to Laclauā€™s understanding of populism and subsequent Essex School applications of it. It is argued that predominantly ethno-, cultural- or nativist-reductionist discourses may nonetheless deploy a populist logic of 'partial openings' in the equivalential chain, especially through the selective equivalential incorporation of sexual or ethno-linguistic minorities against a common (often ā€œIslamicā€) constitutive outside. This is demonstrated empirically in a discourse analysis of the AfD and its development from a ā€œcompetition populismā€ into an ethno-culturally reductionist conception of ā€œthe peopleā€ coexisting with partial openings in relation to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community and Russian-Germans in the Berlin context in particular

    Between illiberalism and hyper-neoliberalism: competing populist discourses in the Czech Republic

    Get PDF
    This paper draws on Laclauā€™s theory of discourse, hegemony, and populism to analyse competing forms of populism in the Czech Republic within the discursive context of ā€˜post-November transformationā€™ as well as in relation to hegemonic struggles over the construction of social order. It is argued that the discourses of Public Affairs (VV), ANO, Dawn of Direct Democracy, and Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) all feature a populist opposition between the ā€˜peopleā€™ or ā€˜citizensā€™ on the one hand and ā€˜political dinosaursā€™, (ā€˜traditionalā€™) ā€˜partiesā€™, or ā€˜godfather party mafiasā€™ of both ā€˜leftā€™ and ā€˜rightā€™ on the other, while also radicalizing in different ways the exclusionary constructions of ā€˜workā€™ in the established discourses of the Civic Democrats (ODS) and Social Democrats (ČSSD). While ANO constructs ā€˜hard workā€™ in a populist manner against the (ā€˜traditionalā€™) ā€˜partiesā€™, VV and Dawn/SPD articulate an exclusion of non-working ā€˜unadaptablesā€™ that points to a notable interplay of hyper-neoliberal welfare chauvinism and anti-minorities illiberalism

    "Autonomie" Revisited: The Autonomist Crossroads in the West German Student Movement's Long March

    Full text link
    This paper seeks to embed into a broader narrative on the political thought of the West German student movement a reading of Schmid's 1975 text in "Autonomie", which synthesized the SDS anti-authoritarians' tradition of a politicized critique of late capitalism with the autonomist impulse in Italian "operaismo". It is argued that in holding out the promise of revolutionary practice in the absence of revolutionary organization, Schmid displaced the very notion of revolutionary practice from the system to the subject level - an issue raised by Kraushaar's 1978 critique of a "ghettoized" milieu consumed by the "radicalization of its own life context". The trans-localization of the alternative milieu, particularly in the form of Green Lists and "die tageszeitung", was subsequently justified by milieu actors as a breakout from the ghetto, but would in turn undermine the milieu's autonomist foundations. Ultimately, Kraushaar's conundrum of "autonomy or ghetto" remained unresolved - reflecting the extra-parliamentary left's inability to integrate strategies of milieu and offensive into a unifying strategy, as Dutschke's 1967 essay "The Long March" had enjoined it to do; the Greens' subsequent entry into parliaments was an expression of the abandonment, not the beginning, of a "long march through the institutions"

    Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: 'Social Movement' (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization

    Full text link
    This article begins with a theoretical tension. Radical democracy, in the joint work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, can be understood as a joint articulation of a post-foundational ontology of contingency and a politics of autonomy of ā€˜democratic struggles' within a hegemonic bloc as loci of antagonisms in their own right, while Laclau's theory of populism marks a shift from the autonomy of struggles to the representative function of the empty signifier as a constitutive dimension. This tension between a horizontal logic of autonomy and a vertical logic of representation comes to the fore not least in the manifold attempts to combine radical-democratic and (left-)populist practices in the wake of the ā€˜movements of the squares.ā€™ This argument is illustrated empirically in the cases of two party projects situating themselves in contexts of social protest - 'Social Movement' in Ukraine and Podemos in Spain - both of which seek to combine a left-populist discursive strategy with some form of radical-democratic politics of autonomy, either by supporting local alliances independent from the party (Podemos) or by integrating trade union representatives into the organizational center, which in turn finds expression in a representative logic ('Social Movement')

    ā€¦ā€‰Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power

    Get PDF
    Drawing on Ernesto Laclau's theory of discourse, hegemony, and populism, this paper analyses the development of the discourses of Fidesz in Hungary and Law and Justice (PiS) in Poland from opposition to power with a focus on how authoritarianism is articulated, especially in relation to populism. The post-foundational discourse analysis finds that populism takes on an authoritarian expression only in certain discursive combinations, mostly with nationalism, while authoritarianism follows a range of different logics (populist and non-populist alike), including nationalism and social welfarism without populism (PiS) or what Laclau refers to as institutionalism (Fidesz)

    From Objectivist Bias to Positivist Bias:A Constructivist Critique of the Attitudes Approach to Populism

    Get PDF
    This article undertakes a critique of the attitudes approach to populism, predicated on survey-based operationalisations of populism as a set of attitudes. Our critique is threefold: first, the move of reducing ā€˜the eliteā€™ to ā€˜the politiciansā€™ in survey items ā€“ beginning with the foundational Akkerman scale ā€“ is at odds with the constructivist underpinnings of Muddeā€™s ideational definition that this literature largely draws on, where ā€˜the peopleā€™ and ā€˜the eliteā€™ are understood as contingent constructions that can take on a wide range of meanings depending on the ideological permutation. Second, our corpus linguistics-based overview of empirical patterns within the ā€˜populist attitudesā€™ literature indicates a skewed focus on the far right within this literature, contrary to the ideological variability of populism following the ideational definition. Third, the reliance on public opinion surveys points to the danger of reifying public opinion and attributing objective qualities to ā€˜the peopleā€™ as such. In assuming categories such as ā€˜the eliteā€™ to stand for determinate referents such as ā€˜the politiciansā€™ in survey-based operationalisations, the positivist bias of the attitudes approach paradoxically mirrors the objectivist bias (following Sartori) of early populism research that reduced the identity of ā€˜the peopleā€™ in populism to determinate socio-structural categories such as the peasantry
    • ā€¦
    corecore