6 research outputs found
Improving the lives of people with musculoskeletal conditions
Musculoskeletal conditions* (MSCs)
are the primary cause of work
absence in Ireland with an estimated
direct cost to the economy of €750
million (Arthritis Ireland 2009). The
management of MSCs focuses on
keeping people at work and participating
in society. Management of MSCs is often
hindered by beliefs and practices of
healthcare professionals and the public,
which are not in line with best evidence
Cognitive functional therapy for disabling non-specific chronic low back pain: a multiple case cohort study
Background. Multiple dimensions across the biopsychosocial spectrum are
relevant in the management of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Cognitive
functional therapy is a behaviorally targeted intervention that combines normalization
of movement and abolition of pain behaviors with cognitive reconceptualization
of the NSCLBP problem while targeting psychosocial and lifestyle barriers to
recovery.
Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of cognitive
functional therapy for people with disabling NSCLBP who were awaiting an
aDesign. A multiple case-cohort study (n 26) consisting of 3 phases (A1–B–A2)
was conducted.ppointment with a specialist medical consultant.
Methods. Measurement phase A1 was a baseline phase during which measurements
of pain and functional disability were collected on 3 occasions over 3 months
for all participants. During phase B, participants entered a cognitive functional
therapy intervention program involving approximately 8 treatments over an average
of 12 weeks. Finally, phase A2 was a 12-month, no-treatment follow-up period.
Outcomes were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance or Friedman
test (with post hoc Bonferroni correction) across 7 time intervals, depending on
normality of data distribution.
Results. Statistically significant reductions in both functional disability and pain
were observed immediately postintervention and were maintained over the 12-month
follow-up period. These reductions reached clinical significance for both disability
and pain. Secondary psychosocial outcomes, including depression, anxiety, back
beliefs, fear of physical activity, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy, were significantly
improved after the intervention.
Limitations. The study was not a randomized controlled trial. Although primary
oConclusions. These promising results suggest that cognitive functional therapy
should be compared with other conservative interventions for the management of
disabling NSCLBP in secondary care settings in large randomized clinical trials
Electromyographic analysis of the three subdivisions of gluteus medius during weight-bearing exercises
Background: Gluteus medius (GM) dysfunction is associated with many musculoskeletal disorders. Rehabilitation exercises aimed at strengthening GM appear to improve lower limb kinematics and reduce pain. However, there is a lack of evidence to identify which exercises best activate GM. In particular, as GM consists of three distinct subdivisions,
it is unclear if GM activation is consistent across these subdivisions during exercise. The aim of this study was to determine the activation of the anterior, middle and posterior subdivisions of GM during weight-bearing exercises.
Methods: A single session, repeated-measures design. The activity of each GM subdivision was measured in 15 painfree subjects using surface electromyography (sEMG) during three weight-bearing exercises; wall squat (WS), pelvic drop (PD) and wall press (WP). Muscle activity was expressed relative to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Differences in muscle activation were determined using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis.
Results: The activation of each GM subdivision during the exercises was significantly different (interaction effect; p < 0.001). There were also significant main effects for muscle subdivision (p < 0.001) and for exercise (p < 0.001). The exercises were progressively more demanding from WS to PD to WP. The exercises caused significantly greater
activation of the middle and posterior subdivisions than the anterior subdivision, with the WP significantly increasing the activation of the posterior subdivision (all p < 0.05).
Discussion: Posterior GM displayed higher activation across all three exercises than both anterior and middle GM. The WP produced the highest %MVIC activation for all GM subdivisions, and this was most pronounced for posterior GM. Clinicians may use these results to effectively progress strengthening exercises for GM in the rehabilitation of lower
extremity injuries
Does using a chair backrest or reducing seated hip flexion influence trunk muscle activity and discomfort? A systematic review
Objective: This paper systematically reviews the effect of chair backrests and reducing seated hip flexion on low back discomfort (LBD) and trunk muscle activation.Background: Prolonged sitting commonly exacerbates low back pain (LBP). Several modifications to seated posture and chair design have been recommended, including using chairs with backrests and chairs that reduce hip flexion.Method: Electronic databases were searched by two independent assessors. Part 1 of this review includes 26 studies comparing the effect of sitting with at least two different hip angles. In Part 2, seven studies that compared the effect of sitting with and without a backrest were eligible. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.Results: Significant confounding variables and a relatively small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving people with LBP complicates analysis of the results. There was moderate evidence that chair backrests reduce paraspinal muscle activation, and limited evidence that chair backrests reduce LBD. There was no evidence that chairs involving less hip flexion reduce LBP or LBD, or consistently alter trunk muscle activation. However, participants in several studies subjectively preferred the modified chairs involving less hip flexion.Conclusion: The limited evidence to support the use of chairs involving less seated hip flexion, or the effect of a backrest, is consistent with the limited evidence that other isolated chair design features can reduce LBP.Application: LBP management is likely to require consideration of several factors in addition to sitting position. Larger RCTs involving people with LBP are required
Peak plantar pressure values for taped and untaped conditions for each region of the foot; medial forefoot (MFF), lateral forefoot (LFF), medial midfoot (MMF), lateral midfoot (LMF), medial hindfoot (MHF) and lateral hindfoot (LHF)
These differences were statistically significant for the lateral midfoot (p = 0.000), the medial forefoot (p = 0.014), and the medial (p = 0.000) and lateral (p = 0.007) hindfoot.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The effect of low-dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/111</p><p>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008;9():111-111.</p><p>Published online 18 Aug 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2529302.</p><p></p
The strength of association between psychological factors and clinical outcome in tendinopathy: A systematic review
Objective: Tendinopathy is often a disabling, and persistent musculoskeletal disorder. Psychological factors appear to play a role in the perpetuation of symptoms and influence recovery in musculoskeletal pain. To date, the impact of psychological factors on clinical outcome in tendinopathy remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the strength of association between psychological factors and clinical outcome in tendinopathy. Methods A systematic review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of published trials was conducted. Electronic searches of ovid MEDLINE, ovid EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library was undertaken from their inception to June 2020. Eligibility criteria included RCT’s and studies of observational design incorporating measurements of psychological factors and pain, disability and physical functional outcomes in people with tendinopathy. Risk of Bias was assessed by two authors using a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. High or low certainty evidence was examined using the GRADE criteria. Results Ten studies of observational design (6-cross sectional and 4 prospective studies), involving a sample of 719 participants with tendinopathy were included. Risk of bias for the included studies ranged from 12/21 to 21/21. Cross-sectional studies of low to very low level of certainty evidence revealed significant weak to moderate strength of association (r = 0.24 to
0.53) between psychological factors and clinical outcomes. Prospective baseline data of
very low certainty evidence showed weak strength of association between psychological
factors and clinical outcome. However, prospective studies were inconsistent in showing a
predictive relationship between baseline psychological factors on long-term outcome. Cross sectional studies report similar strengths of association between psychological factors and clinical outcomes in tendinopathy to those found in other musculoskeletal conditions. Conclusion The overall body of the evidence after applying the GRADE criteria was low to very low certainty evidence, due to risk of bias, imprecision and indirectness found across included studies. Future, high quality longitudinal cohort studies are required to investigate the predictive value of baseline psychological factors on long-term clinical outcome