The remarkable response of the right ventricle in CTEPH and PAH

Discussion Summary In part I of this thesis we investigated the long-term outcomes of PEA in CTEPH and RV function during exercise. We observed that long-term exercise intolerance is common after PEA and is associated with age, low DLCO and post-operative RV function. Second, we saw that the exertional RV stroke volume response improved significantly after PEA despite a persistently abnormal afterload and absence of a RV contractile reserve. Third, RV diffuse interstitial fibrosis did not completely regress after PEA, while residual RV fibrosis was not associated with increased RV diastolic stiffness In part II of this thesis we confirmed previous findings of a changing iPAH population by using the H2FPEF-score. We demonstrated that a high H2FPEF-score in iPAH is associated with a worse prognosis and with signs of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. However, hemodynamic and functional responses to PAH treatment were not predicted by the H2FPEF-score. Next, we described the right heart in PAH compared to HFpEF. We showed that RV and RA function were less compromised in HFpEF-PH than in PAH, despite similar degrees of pressure-overload. Increased RA pressure and stiffness in HFpEF-PH were explained by increased left atrial/RA-interaction. In part III of this thesis vascular involvement in COVID-19 was explored. We showed that besides diffuse alveolar damage, pulmonary vascular involvement was frequently observed. Treatment of pulmonary edema and vascular leak in COVID-19 with Imatinib did not reduce the time to discontinuation of ventilation and supplemental oxygen

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with a high H2FPEF-score: Insights from the Amsterdam UMC PAH-cohort

Background: The idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH) phenotype is changing from a predominantly young female patient to an older, frequently obese patient of either sex. Many newly diagnosed iPAH-patients have risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), possibly affecting management and treatment. Aim: To determine whether the H2FPEF-score identifies a subgroup of iPAH-patients with blunted response to PAH-targeted treatment. Study design and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 253 treatment-naïve iPAH-patients (1989-2019) with a confirmed diagnosis after right heart catheterization by a multidisciplinary team. Follow-up RHC measurements were available in 150 iPAH-patients. iPAH-patients were stratified by the H2FPEF-score; a score ≥5 identified a higher possibility of (concealed) LVDD. Results: The presence of a high H2FPEF-score in incident iPAH-patients rose 30% in thirty years. Patients with a H2FPEF-score ≥5 were older, more often male and/or obese, and had more comorbidities than patients with a H2FPEF-score ≤1. A high H2FPEF-score was associated with worse survival and poor functional capacity. Right ventricular function was equally depressed among iPAH-groups. Imaging and invasive hemodynamic measurements suggested concealed LVDD in iPAH patients with a high H2FPEF-score. At follow-up, hemodynamic and functional responses were similar in iPAH-patients with a high or low H2FPEF-score. Conclusions: While a high H2FPEF-score in iPAH is associated with a worse prognosis and signs of LVDD, hemodynamic and functional responses to PAH treatment are not predicted by the H2FPEF-score

Discrimination Between Pre‐ and Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Using Platelet RNA

Background Appropriate treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is critically dependent on accurate discrimination between pre‐ and postcapillary PH. However, clinical discrimination is challenging and frequently requires a right heart catheterization. Existing risk scores to detect postcapillary PH have suboptimal discriminatory strength. We have previously shown that platelet‐derived RNA profiles may have diagnostic value for PH detection. Here, we hypothesize that platelet‐derived RNAs can be employed to select unique biomarker panels for the discrimination between pre‐ and postcapillary PH. Methods and Results Blood platelet RNA from whole blood was isolated and sequenced from 50 patients with precapillary PH (with different PH subtypes) as well as 50 patients with postcapillary PH. RNA panels were calculated by ANOVA statistics, and classifications were performed using a support vector machine algorithm, supported by particle swarm optimization. We identified in total 4279 different RNAs in blood platelets from patients with pre‐ and postcapillary PH. A particle swarm optimization–selected RNA panel of 1618 distinctive RNAs with differential levels together with a trained support vector machine algorithm accurately discriminated patients with precapillary PH from patients with postcapillary PH with 100% sensitivity, 60% specificity, 80% accuracy, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86–1.00) area under the curve in the independent validation series (n=20). Conclusions This proof‐of‐concept study demonstrates that particle swarm optimization/support vector machine–enhanced classification of platelet RNA panels may be able to discriminate precapillary PH from postcapillary PH. This research provides a foundation for the development of a blood test with a high negative predictive value that would improve early diagnosis of precapillary PH and prevents unnecessary invasive testing in patients with postcapillary PH

COVID-19: Histopathological correlates of imaging patterns on chest computed tomography

Background and objective: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia present with typical findings on chest computed tomography (CT), but the underlying histopathological patterns are unknown. Through direct regional correlation of imaging findings to histopathological patterns, this study aimed to explain typical COVID-19 CT patterns at tissue level. Methods: Eight autopsy cases were prospectively selected of patients with PCR-proven COVID-19 pneumonia with varying clinical manifestations and causes of death. All had been subjected to chest CT imaging 24–72 h prior to death. Twenty-seven lung areas with typical COVID-19 patterns and two radiologically unaffected pulmonary areas were correlated to histopathological findings in the same lung regions. Results: Two dominant radiological patterns were observed: ground-glass opacity (GGO) (n = 11) and consolidation (n = 16). In seven of 11 sampled areas of GGO, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was observed. In four areas of GGO, the histological pattern was vascular damage and thrombosis, with (n = 2) or without DAD (n = 2). DAD was also observed in five of 16 samples derived from areas of radiological consolidation. Seven areas of consolidation were based on a combination of DAD, vascular damage and thrombosis. In four areas of consolidation, bronchopneumonia was found. Unexpectedly, in samples from radiologically unaffected lung parenchyma, evidence was found of vascular damage and thrombosis. Conclusion: In COVID-19, radiological findings of GGO and consolidation are mostly explained by DAD or a combination of DAD and vascular damage plus thrombosis. However, the different typical CT patterns in COVID-19 are not related to specific histopathological patterns. Microvascular damage and thrombosis are even encountered in the radiologically normal lung

COVID-19: Histopathological correlates of imaging patterns on chest computed tomography

Background and objective: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia present with typical findings on chest computed tomography (CT), but the underlying histopathological patterns are unknown. Through direct regional correlation of imaging findings to histopathological patterns, this study aimed to explain typical COVID-19 CT patterns at tissue level. Methods: Eight autopsy cases were prospectively selected of patients with PCR-proven COVID-19 pneumonia with varying clinical manifestations and causes of death. All had been subjected to chest CT imaging 24–72 h prior to death. Twenty-seven lung areas with typical COVID-19 patterns and two radiologically unaffected pulmonary areas were correlated to histopathological findings in the same lung regions. Results: Two dominant radiological patterns were observed: ground-glass opacity (GGO) (n = 11) and consolidation (n = 16). In seven of 11 sampled areas of GGO, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was observed. In four areas of GGO, the histological pattern was vascular damage and thrombosis, with (n = 2) or without DAD (n = 2). DAD was also observed in five of 16 samples derived from areas of radiological consolidation. Seven areas of consolidation were based on a combination of DAD, vascular damage and thrombosis. In four areas of consolidation, bronchopneumonia was found. Unexpectedly, in samples from radiologically unaffected lung parenchyma, evidence was found of vascular damage and thrombosis. Conclusion: In COVID-19, radiological findings of GGO and consolidation are mostly explained by DAD or a combination of DAD and vascular damage plus thrombosis. However, the different typical CT patterns in COVID-19 are not related to specific histopathological patterns. Microvascular damage and thrombosis are even encountered in the radiologically normal lung

Right Ventricular and Right Atrial Function Are Less Compromised in Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comparison With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Similar Pressure Overload

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent disorder for which no effective treatment yet exists. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) dysfunction are frequently observed. The question remains whether the PH with the associated RV/RA dysfunction in HFpEF are markers of disease severity. METHODS: To obtain insight in the relative importance of pressure-overload and left-to-right interaction, we compared RA and RV function in 3 groups: 1. HFpEF (n=13); 2. HFpEF-PH (n=33), and; 3. pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) matched to pulmonary artery pressures of HFpEF-PH (PH limited to mPAP ≥30 and ≤50 mmHg) (n=47). Patients underwent right heart catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The right ventricle in HFpEF-PH was less dilated and hypertrophied than in PAH. In addition, RV ejection fraction was more preserved (HFpEF-PH: 52±11 versus PAH: 36±12%). RV filling patterns differed: vena cava backflow during RA contraction was observed in PAH only. In HFpEF-PH, RA pressure was elevated throughout the cardiac cycle (HFpEF-PH: 10 [8-14] versus PAH: 7 [5-10] mm Hg), while RA volume was smaller, reflecting excessive RA stiffness (HFpEF-PH: 0.14 [0.10-0.17] versus PAH: 0.08 [0.06-0.11] mm Hg/mL). RA stiffness was associated with an increased eccentricity index (HFpEF-PH: 1.3±0.2 versus PAH: 1.2±0.1) and interatrial pressure gradient (9 [5 to 12] versus 2 [-2 to 5] mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: RV/RA function was less compromised in HFpEF-PH than in PAH, despite similar pressure-overload. Increased RA pressure and stiffness in HFpEF-PH were explained by left atrial/RA-interaction. Therefore, our results indicate that increased RA pressure is not a sign of overt RV failure but rather a reflection of HFpEF-severity