Risk Stratification after an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Significance of Antithrombotic Therapy

The impact of the de-escalation strategy of antiplatelet therapy (APT) on the life expectancy after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires an assessment in real clinical practice. Into the Russian multicentral observational trial (ORACLE II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04068909), 1803 patients with ACS and PCI indications were enrolled. During 12 months of follow-up, 228 all-cause deaths have occurred. The analysis of death predictors was carried out by the classification tree method. Age, an option of antithrombotic therapy, a history of chronic heart failure, and uric acid level had the greatest prognostic value. The death prediction model’s sensitivity was 82.1% in the training cohort and 79.2% in the test cohort. During the observation period, ticagrelor was replaced with clopidogrel (APT de-escalation) in 357 patients. The groups of patients with different antiplatelet therapy options were adjusted for clinical parameters by the pseudorandomization method. The de-escalation group had the lowerest all-cause death rate. The incidence of bleeding and recurrent nonfatal coronary events in the study groups did not differ significantly. Thus, the APT regimen’s advantage of changing from the maximum in the first weeks after ACS to moderate at follow-up has been confirmed. There is an obvious need to study the possibilities of individualizing antiplatelet therapy in patients after acute coronary syndromes

Effects of the lercanidipine - Enalapril combination vs. The corresponding monotherapies on home blood pressure in hypertension: Evidence from a large database

103siObjective: To compare a combination of a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor vs. monotherapy with one or the other drug and placebo for their effects on home blood pressure (HBP). Methods: After a 2-week placebo wash-out, patients with an elevated office blood pressure (BP) (diastolic 100–109 and systolic <180 mmHg) and HBP (diastolic 85 mmHg) were randomized double-blind to a 10-week treatment with placebo, lercanidipine, 10 or 20mg daily, enalapril, 10 or 20mg daily, or the four possible combinations. In addition to office BP, HBP was self-measured via a validated semiautomatic device twice in the morning and twice in the evening during the 7 days before randomization and at the end of treatment. Baseline and treatment HBP values were separately averaged for each day, morning, evening or the whole monitoring period, excluding the first day. Day-by-day HBP variability was defined as the SD or the variation coefficient of the daily BP averages. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-four patients with valid HBP recordings at baseline and at the end of treatment were analyzed (intention-to-treat population). From the baseline value (147.011.6 mmHg) systolic/diastolic HBP showed a small reduction (average baseline-adjusted change: –1.8/–1.6 mmHg) with placebo, a more marked significant fall with monotherapies (8.8/5.9 mmHg, P<0.001/<0.001 vs. placebo) and even more with combination treatment (11.6/7.6 mmHg, P<0.001/ <0.001 vs. placebo and P<0.01/<0.05 vs. monotherapy). A similar pattern was observed for each of the days of the BP self-monitoring period as well as for either morning or evening values, although the difference between mono and combination treatment appeared to be consistently significant for the morning values only. Dayby- day systolic BP-SD was unaffected by placebo and slightly reduced by drug treatments, with no, however, significant changes in SBP-variation coefficient. Baseline and end of treatment HBP values showed a limited correlation with office BP values, this being particularly the case for treatment-induced changes (correlation coefficients: 0.37 for systolic and 0.45 for diastolic BP). Conclusion: This large HBP database shows that the lercanidipine–enalapril combination lowers HBP more effectively than the corresponding monotherapies and placebo, and that this greater effect is consistent between days.reservedmixedMancia, Giuseppe; Omboni, Stefano; Chazova, Irina; Coca, Antonio; Girerd, Xavier; Haller, Hermann; Parati, Gianfranco; Pauletto, Paolo; Pupek-Musialik, Danuta; Svyshchenko, Yevgeniya; Boye, Alain; Charrier, Bruno; Couffin, Yvon; Marmor, Philippe; Marty, Jacques; Navarre, Jean Louis; Ansari, Anwar; Büttner, Claudia; Kropp, Maximilian; Mehling, Heidrun; Paschen, Christine; Schenkenberger, Isabelle; Schneider, Helmut; Sperling, Karsten; Stübler, Petra; Von Behren, Volker; Lembo, Giuseppe; Scanferla, Flavio; Sechi, Leonardo Alberto; Gębala, Andrzej; Hoffmann, Andrzej; Janik, Krzysztof; Klimza-Masłowska, Anna; Kaczmarek, Barbara; Koźminski, Piotr; Makowiecka-Cies̈la, Magdalena; Mordaka, Robert; Nowakowski, Tomasz; Pasternak, Dariusz; Skibińska, Elzbieta; Sulik, Piotr; Szpajer, Michał; Walczewska, Jolanta; Zaczek, Marcin; Zienciuk-Krajka, Agnieszka; Alexeeva, Nadezhda; Bokarev, Igor; Chazova, Iina; Conrady, Alexandra; Emelyanov, Alexander; Galustyan, Anna; Idrisova, Elena; Khasanov, Niyaz; Khokhlov, Alexander; Libov, Igor; Reshetko, Olga; Sokurenko, German; Stryuk, Raisa; Tereshchenko, Sergey; Trofimov, Vasily; Zrazhevsky, Konstantin; Carlos Calvo, S.; De Teresa, Luis; Ferre, Raimon; García, Juan; Gil, Apolonia; Gil, Blas; Montenegro, Jesús; Oliván, Josefina; Ortiz, Jacinto; Pascual, José María; Rivera, Antonio; De Quevedo, José Antonio Sainz; Zúñiga, Manuel; Martinez, Valentin; Pujol, Montserrat; Bazylevych, Andriy; Gyrina, Olga; Ignatenko, Grygoriy; Kazymyrko, Vitaly; Khomazyuk, Tetyana; Kononenko, Lyudmyla; Korzh, Oleksii; Kovalenko, Volodymyr; Kuryata, Oleksander; Kushnir, Mykola; Lishnevska, Viktoriia; Lymar, Iurii; Ostrovska, Lidiia; Popik, Galyna; Rudyk, Yuriy; Shershnyova, Oxana; Sierkova, Valentyna; Storozhuk, Borys; Tseluyko, Vira; Vatutin, Mykola; Vayda, Myroslava; Vizir, Vadym; Volkov, Volodymyr; Voloshyna, Olena; Yagensky, Andriy; Zhurba, Svitlana; Zorin, ValeriiMancia, Giuseppe; Omboni, Stefano; Chazova, Irina; Coca, Antonio; Girerd, Xavier; Haller, Hermann; Parati, Gianfranco; Pauletto, Paolo; Pupek Musialik, Danuta; Svyshchenko, Yevgeniya; Boye, Alain; Charrier, Bruno; Couffin, Yvon; Marmor, Philippe; Marty, Jacques; Navarre, Jean Louis; Ansari, Anwar; Büttner, Claudia; Kropp, Maximilian; Mehling, Heidrun; Paschen, Christine; Schenkenberger, Isabelle; Schneider, Helmut; Sperling, Karsten; Stübler, Petra; Von Behren, Volker; Lembo, Giuseppe; Scanferla, Flavio; Sechi, Leonardo Alberto; Gębala, Andrzej; Hoffmann, Andrzej; Janik, Krzysztof; Klimza Masłowska, Anna; Kaczmarek, Barbara; Koźminski, Piotr; Makowiecka Cies̈la, Magdalena; Mordaka, Robert; Nowakowski, Tomasz; Pasternak, Dariusz; Skibińska, Elzbieta; Sulik, Piotr; Szpajer, Michał; Walczewska, Jolanta; Zaczek, Marcin; Zienciuk Krajka, Agnieszka; Alexeeva, Nadezhda; Bokarev, Igor; Chazova, Iina; Conrady, Alexandra; Emelyanov, Alexander; Galustyan, Anna; Idrisova, Elena; Khasanov, Niyaz; Khokhlov, Alexander; Libov, Igor; Reshetko, Olga; Sokurenko, German; Stryuk, Raisa; Tereshchenko, Sergey; Trofimov, Vasily; Zrazhevsky, Konstantin; Carlos Calvo, S.; De Teresa, Luis; Ferre, Raimon; García, Juan; Gil, Apolonia; Gil, Blas; Montenegro, Jesús; Oliván, Josefina; Ortiz, Jacinto; Pascual, José María; Rivera, Antonio; De Quevedo, José Antonio Sainz; Zúñiga, Manuel; Martinez, Valentin; Pujol, Montserrat; Bazylevych, Andriy; Gyrina, Olga; Ignatenko, Grygoriy; Kazymyrko, Vitaly; Khomazyuk, Tetyana; Kononenko, Lyudmyla; Korzh, Oleksii; Kovalenko, Volodymyr; Kuryata, Oleksander; Kushnir, Mykola; Lishnevska, Viktoriia; Lymar, Iurii; Ostrovska, Lidiia; Popik, Galyna; Rudyk, Yuriy; Shershnyova, Oxana; Sierkova, Valentyna; Storozhuk, Borys; Tseluyko, Vira; Vatutin, Mykola; Vayda, Myroslava; Vizir, Vadym; Volkov, Volodymyr; Voloshyna, Olena; Yagensky, Andriy; Zhurba, Svitlana; Zorin, Valeri

Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI) : a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Background: Patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly those with previous stenting, are at high risk of ischaemic events. These patients are generally treated with aspirin. In this trial, we aimed to investigate if these patients would benefit from treatment with aspirin plus ticagrelor. Methods: The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in diabEtes Mellitus patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) was a phase 3 randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, done in 1315 sites in 42 countries. Patients were eligible if 50 years or older, with type 2 diabetes, receiving anti-hyperglycaemic drugs for at least 6 months, with stable coronary artery disease, and one of three other mutually non-exclusive criteria: a history of previous PCI or of coronary artery bypass grafting, or documentation of angiographic stenosis of 50% or more in at least one coronary artery. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ticagrelor or placebo, by use of an interactive voice-response or web-response system. The THEMIS-PCI trial comprised a prespecified subgroup of patients with previous PCI. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (measured in the intention-to-treat population). Findings: Between Feb 17, 2014, and May 24, 2016, 11 154 patients (58% of the overall THEMIS trial) with a history of previous PCI were enrolled in the THEMIS-PCI trial. Median follow-up was 3·3 years (IQR 2·8–3·8). In the previous PCI group, fewer patients receiving ticagrelor had a primary efficacy outcome event than in the placebo group (404 [7·3%] of 5558 vs 480 [8·6%] of 5596; HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·74–0·97], p=0·013). The same effect was not observed in patients without PCI (p=0·76, p interaction=0·16). The proportion of patients with cardiovascular death was similar in both treatment groups (174 [3·1%] with ticagrelor vs 183 (3·3%) with placebo; HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·78–1·18], p=0·68), as well as all-cause death (282 [5·1%] vs 323 [5·8%]; 0·88 [0·75–1·03], p=0·11). TIMI major bleeding occurred in 111 (2·0%) of 5536 patients receiving ticagrelor and 62 (1·1%) of 5564 patients receiving placebo (HR 2·03 [95% CI 1·48–2·76], p<0·0001), and fatal bleeding in 6 (0·1%) of 5536 patients with ticagrelor and 6 (0·1%) of 5564 with placebo (1·13 [0·36–3·50], p=0·83). Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 33 (0·6%) and 31 (0·6%) patients (1·21 [0·74–1·97], p=0·45). Ticagrelor improved net clinical benefit: 519/5558 (9·3%) versus 617/5596 (11·0%), HR=0·85, 95% CI 0·75–0·95, p=0·005, in contrast to patients without PCI where it did not, p interaction=0·012. Benefit was present irrespective of time from most recent PCI. Interpretation: In patients with diabetes, stable coronary artery disease, and previous PCI, ticagrelor added to aspirin reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, although with increased major bleeding. In that large, easily identified population, ticagrelor provided a favourable net clinical benefit (more than in patients without history of PCI). This effect shows that long-term therapy with ticagrelor in addition to aspirin should be considered in patients with diabetes and a history of PCI who have tolerated antiplatelet therapy, have high ischaemic risk, and low bleeding risk