2 research outputs found

    Comparison of denoising methods for digital mammographic image

    Get PDF
    We compared effects of denoising methods on digital mammographic images. The denoising methods studied were an adaptive Wiener filter and low–pass Gaussian filter. The denoising methods were applied as an image preprocessing techniques before enhancement. The performance of image denoising methods are based on Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Peak Signal To Ratio (PSNR) values

    Mammographic phantom images using receiver operating characteristic analysis

    Get PDF
    Breast cancer is a form of cancer which is a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Some digital mammographic images are noisy and have low contrast. Image processing techniques have been used to improve the quality of images. The aim of this study is to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on mammographic phantom images subjected to two enhancement techniques in order to verify whether the enhancements improve the quality of the images. The digital mammographic images were enhanced using the morphological and wavelet transform techniques. For the morphological techniques, the images were enhanced using dilation for morphological operation and morphological closing. For wavelet transform enhancement, biorthogonal 2.8 wavelet filter with two levels of decomposition (L=2) was used. Four observers evaluated the images that contain fibres, nodules and micronodules. The detection performances of the original and enhanced images were evaluated using ROC curves. The images were also rated based on contrast visibility, sharpness and overall image quality. The ROC analysis showed that detection of micronodules gave higher area index of curves and sensitivity than the detection of nodules and fibrils in all image datasets. For evaluation of overall image quality using observers’ subjective rating scale, original images have higher mean values than the enhanced images
    corecore