Microtensile bond strength of ceramic to resin using different silanes

Oral Session - Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms: 9. Cement Adhesion to Ceramics: no. 27OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the micro-tensile bond strength of a leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic to a resin cement using different types of silane primers. METHODS: 18 leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic blocks (Ceramco II, Dentsply) in dimensional of 6×6×6 mm were fabricated. The ceramic blocks were ground on wet SiC papers and then cleansed ultrasonically in distilled water. The bonding ceramic surfaces were treated with different silane solutions as follows: Commercial silane as control: Monobond S (Ivoclar-Vivadent); methacryloxypropyl silane and experimental silanes with two concentrations (1% and 2.5%): amino, isocyanate, styryl, and acrylate silanes. The silane application method consisted of ...postprin

An investigation into the different methods of recording centric relation

Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN029334 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo

Fracture toughness of Ideal Macoo resin composite compared with standard ones

Statement of Problem: Evaluation of fracture properties is a basic principle for true assessment of brittle materials’ properties. Resin–based composite materials are being used extensively in today’s dentistry. Fracture toughness is considered an important parameter for providing useful information about material’s nature, properties and its resistance to fracture. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture toughness of a resin composite produced in the country and to compare it with that of other standard materials. Materials and Methods: Four types of resin composite materials were used as follow to prepare 60 specimens (n=15 for each group), A) Tetric Ceram (Ivoclar–Vivadent); B) Brilliant (Coltene-Whaledent); C) SpectrumTPH (Dentsply); and D) Ideal Macoo (Ideal Macoo, Iran). Specimens of 5 mm diameter ( 0.1 mm) and 2 mm depth (±0.1 mm) were prepared in a central notch (90 notch angle) PTFE mold. Then specimens were light cured with two applications of overlapping exposures for a total of 120 s and were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 48 hours, A cylindrical roller of 3 mm diameter was seated inside the V sections and fracture was accomplished in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by one–way ANOVA and post-hoc paired Tukey HSD test with P0.05). Conclusion: From evaluating the fracture properties of materials tested in this study it was concluded that the mean fracture toughness value for SpectrumTPH (Dentsply) was significantly higher than that of Ideal Macoo resin composite material (Ideal Macoo, Iran). The F.T value for Ideal Macoo was considered acceptable as it was not significantly different from that of other resin composite materials tested