Static and dynamic hyperinflation during severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background: Static hyperinflation is known to be increased during moderate acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (AECOPD), but few data exist in patients with severe exacerbations of COPD. The role of dynamic hyperinflation during exacerbations is unclear. Methods: In a prospective, observational cohort study, we recruited patients admitted to hospital for AECOPD. The following measurements were performed upon admission and again after resolution (stable state) at least 42 days later: inspiratory capacity (IC), body plethysmography, dynamic hyperinflation by metronome-paced IC measurement, health-related quality of life and dyspnea. Results: Forty COPD patients were included of whom 28 attended follow-up. The IC was low at admission (2.05 +/- 0.11 L) and increased again during resolution by 15.6%+/- 23.1% or 0.28 +/- 0.08 L (mean +/- standard error of the mean, p Conclusion: Static hyperinflation is increased during severe AECOPD requiring hospitalization compared with stable state. We could measure metronome-paced dynamic hyperinflation during severe AECOPD but found no increase

Asthma exacerbations and worsenings in patients aged 1-75 years with add-on tiotropium treatment

This review explores the effect of tiotropium Respimat® add-on therapy on asthma exacerbations and worsenings, adverse events (AEs) related to exacerbations and symptoms and any effects on seasonality across the 10 UniTinA-asthma® clinical trials comprising over 6000 patients. When added on to inhaled corticosteroids ± additional therapies, tiotropium significantly reduced the risk of exacerbations and worsenings in adults with symptomatic severe asthma and provided a non-significant improvement in worsenings in adults with symptomatic moderate and mild asthma, which was significant for patients with moderate asthma receiving tiotropium 2.5 µg once daily vs. placebo. Trials in paediatric patients were not powered to assess exacerbations or worsenings, but when AEs related to asthma exacerbations and symptoms were grouped into a composite endpoint and pooled, tiotropium improved outcomes vs. placebo (rate ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.93). The reduction in exacerbations with tiotropium is apparent across all patients during the observed seasonal peaks of these events

Inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists in asthma - A narrative review

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have a recognised role in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In asthma, muscarinic antagonists (both short- and long-acting) were historically considered less effective than β2-agonists; only relatively recently have studies been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of LAMAs, as add-on to either inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy or ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations. These studies led to the approval of the first LAMA, tiotropium, as an add-on therapy in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Subsequently, a number of single-inhaler ICS/LABA/LAMA triple therapies have been approved or are in clinical development for the management of asthma. There is now substantial evidence of the efficacy and safety of LAMAs in asthma that is uncontrolled despite treatment with an ICS/LABA combination. This regimen is recommended by GINA as an optimisation step for patients with severe asthma before any biologic or systemic corticosteroid treatment is initiated. This narrative review summarises the potential mechanisms of action of LAMAs in asthma, together with the initial clinical evidence supporting this use. We also discuss the studies that led to the approval of tiotropium for asthma and the data evaluating the efficacy and safety of the various triple therapies, before considering other potential uses for triple therapy

Muscle Function in Moderate to Severe Asthma:Association With Clinical Outcomes and Inflammatory Markers

BackgroundPatients with severe asthma have been shown to have low muscle mass, but the clinical consequences are unknown.ObjectiveIn a clinical cohort of patients with moderate to severe asthma, we aimed to assess muscle mass and strength and their relation with functional and clinical outcomes, as well as with systemic inflammatory markers.MethodsMuscle mass and strength were assessed by the fat-free mass index (FFMI), creatinine excretion in a 24-hour urine sample, and handgrip strength test. Functional outcomes included pulmonary function tests and the 6-minute walking distance, whereas clinical outcomes were assessed with questionnaires on asthma control, quality of life, and health care use. Associations of muscle mass and strength with asthma outcomes were assessed with multivariable regression analyses.ResultsA total of 114 patients participated (36% male; mean age, 51.9 ± 14.4 years; body mass index, 27.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2). According to predefined criteria, 16% had a low FFMI and 8% a low urinary creatinine excretion, which did not differ between categories of asthma severity. Both lower FFMI and urinary creatinine excretion were associated with lower values of FEV1 and 6-minute walking distance, whereas a lower handgrip strength was related to worse asthma control, poorer quality of life, and a higher probability of emergency visits (all P < .05). Except for higher leukocytes in relation to lower FFMI, we did not find associations between systemic inflammatory markers and muscle function.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that low muscle mass is prevalent in patients with moderate to severe asthma and, along with low muscle strength, is associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Our results encourage longitudinal studies into muscle function as a potential target for treatment to improve asthma outcomes

Dietary Inflammatory Index and clinical outcome measures in adults with moderate to severe asthma

BACKGROUND: Diet is increasingly recognized as a modifiable factor in lung health, predominantly due to the immunomodulatory effects of nutrients. The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is a score developed to express the inflammatory potential of a diet.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association of the DII and food groups, with clinical, functional and inflammatory asthma outcomes in adults with asthma.METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe asthma were included in this cross-sectional study between June 2019 and October 2021, and completed a 3-day food diary, to calculate the DII and intake of food groups (i.e. fruits, whole grains, processed meats and sugar-sweetened beverages). Functional outcomes included pulmonary function tests and the 6-minute walking distance, while clinical outcomes were assessed using questionnaires on asthma control, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Inflammatory markers were exhaled nitric oxide and blood leukocytes, eosinophils and interleukin-6. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association of DII and food groups with asthma outcomes.RESULTS: A total of 109 patients participated (35% male, mean±SD age 51.8 ± 14.2 years, BMI 27.4 ± 5.3 kg/m 2). Overall, 62% had a DII score &gt;0, indicating a pro-inflammatory diet, which was not related to asthma severity. A more pro-inflammatory diet was consistently associated to lower FVC (%pred), but inconsistent results were observed with respect to airway obstruction. Neither the DII nor food groups were associated with clinical outcomes. Except for higher levels of exhaled nitric oxide in relation to an anti-inflammatory diet, we found no associations between inflammatory markers and the DII. CONCLUSION: Results from this cross-sectional study among patients with moderate to severe asthma do not support the hypothesis that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with worse asthma outcomes, although limitations in study design and dietary intake estimation should be considered. Future well-designed experimental studies are needed to assess whether targeting the inflammatory potential of diet could lead to better outcomes in adults with asthma.</p

Indacaterol vs tiotropium in COPD patients classified as GOLD A and B

SummaryIntroductionAccording to current GOLD strategy, patients with COPD classified as groups A and B may be treated with inhaled bronchodilators, either long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). However, there is little guidance on which class of agent is preferred and a lack of prospective data to differentiate the two.MethodsIn this study, we performed post-hoc analyses of pooled data from two prospective, controlled clinical trials comparing the LABA indacaterol and LAMA tiotropium in 1422 patients with moderate airflow limitation and no history of exacerbations in the previous year. This population fits the definitions of GOLD A and B groups and could be further stratified by symptom severity using Baseline Dyspnea Index (i.e. modeling GOLD A or B) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use at baseline. Outcomes measured after 12 weeks of treatment were lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ), symptoms (Transition Dyspnea Index; TDI) and rescue medication use.ResultsIn ‘GOLD A’ patients not receiving ICS, differences favored indacaterol versus tiotropium (trough FEV1 0.05 L; rescue medication use −0.41 puffs/day; TDI total score 0.94 points; SGRQ total score −3.13 units, all p < 0.01). In ‘GOLD B, no ICS’ patients, compared with tiotropium, indacaterol treatment increased trough FEV1 (0.055 L, p < 0.05) and permitted a larger reduction in rescue medication use (−0.81 puffs/day, p = 0.004). In all patients, and in patients not using ICS, differences favored indacaterol for all variables.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that patients in GOLD groups A and B may experience greater benefits with indacaterol than with tiotropium