Comparative efficacy of Finerenone versus Canagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison

This study aimed to close an evidence gap concerning the relative efficacy of finerenone versus SGLT2is in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Canagliflozin was selected as a proxy for the SGLT2i class. Patient-level data of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of finerenone (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) were used alongside aggregated data from CREDENCE, an RCT of canagliflozin. To account for meaningful between-study heterogeneity between each finerenone trial and CREDENCE, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of a range of efficacy outcomes was undertaken for each finerenone study versus CREDENCE. These results were meta-analyzed, enabling the estimation of the relative effects of finerenone against canagliflozin. For the cardiorenal composite endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing finerenone to canagliflozin was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.36). The corresponding HRs for all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular death were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.34), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.55) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.64 to 1.37), respectively. The absence of statistically significant differences was consistent throughout the main analysis and a range of sensitivity analyses. Based on this study, using a large sample of data and adjusted for meaningful differences between the baseline characteristics of the included RCTs, there was no statistically significant evidence indicating a difference in the efficacy of finerenone compared to canagliflozin in the treatment of CKD in patients with T2D

Estimated health economic impact of conducting urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio testing alongside estimated glomerular filtration rate testing in the early stages of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

Aim: To estimate the health economic impact of undertaking urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing versus no UACR testing in early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: An economic model, taking a UK healthcare system perspective, estimated the impact of UACR testing on additional costs, clinical benefits measured as prevented dialyses and cardiovascular-related deaths, life years gained (LYg), LYg before kidney failure, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sixteen of the 18 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap categories were considered separately, and grouped in health states according to CKD risk. Results were derived for current standard-of-care and emerging CKD therapies. Results: The cohort that adhered to both UACR and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) testing guidelines in early stages of CKD (n = 1000) was associated with approximately 500 LYg before kidney failure onset; costing approximately £2.5 M. ICERs across the KDIGO heatmap categories were approximately £5,000. Limitations: This model used data from a comprehensive meta-analysis that was initiated more than 10 years ago (2009). While this was the most comprehensive source identified, recent changes in the treatment landscape, patient population and social determinants of CKD will not be captured. Furthermore, a narrow approach was taken, aligning included costs with UK NHS reference materials. This means that some direct and indirect drivers of costs in late-stage disease have been excluded. Conclusions: UACR testing in the early stages of CKD is cost effective in T2D patients. Emerging therapies with the potential to slow CKD progression, mean that optimal monitoring through UACR/eGFR testing will become increasingly important for accurate identification and timely treatment initiation, particularly for the highest-risk A3 category

Patient-reported outcomes associated with changing to rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism - The COSIMO study.

n/

Thirteen-year trend in the persistence with vitamin K antagonists for venous thromboembolism in the UK: a cohort study

<p><b>Background:</b> Venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and is associated with significant recurrence and mortality risk. Standard VTE treatment includes at least 3 months anticoagulation. The objective was to describe time trends in the duration of oral anticoagulation in patients initially treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with first VTE and VKA treatment initiation within 30 days, identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink from 2001 to 2014. VKA users were followed for the duration of oral anticoagulation which included switching to non-VKA oral anticoagulants. The probability of remaining on anticoagulation treatment (persistence) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival functions.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 16,018 patients with VTE initiated VKA; 48.2% males, mean age 62.1 years, median VKA treatment duration 6.5 months. The 90-day persistence increased from 75.6% in 2001 to 91.2% in 2013 (<i>p</i> < .0001) and the 180-day persistence from 39.3% in 2001 to 61.1% in 2013 (<i>p</i> < .0001). This time trend was also shown for patients with DVT, PE, provoked VTE, unprovoked VTE, provoked DVT, unprovoked DVT, provoked PE and unprovoked PE. There were no major differences in persistence between patients with provoked and unprovoked VTE, but persistence was lower following DVT than PE (<i>p</i> < .0001).</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The increase in persistence was independent of the presentation of the first VTE (provoked or unprovoked), but higher for first PE. Whether the increasing persistence resulted in decreasing risk of recurrent VTE needs to be confirmed.</p

Real-world clinical evidence on rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban compared with vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic literature review

International audienc