25 research outputs found
The choice of self-rated health measures matter when predicting mortality: evidence from 10 years follow-up of the Australian longitudinal study of ageing
BACKGROUND Self-rated health (SRH) measures with different wording and reference points are often used as equivalent health indicators in public health surveys estimating health outcomes such as healthy life expectancies and mortality for older adults. Whilst the robust relationship between SRH and mortality is well established, it is not known how comparable different SRH items are in their relationship to mortality over time. We used a dynamic evaluation model to investigate the sensitivity of time-varying SRH measures with different reference points to predict mortality in older adults over time. METHODS We used seven waves of data from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (1992 to 2004; N = 1733, 52.6% males). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between three time-varying SRH measures (global, age-comparative and self-comparative reference point) with mortality in older adults (65+ years). RESULTS After accounting for other mortality risk factors, poor global SRH ratings increased mortality risk by 2.83 times compared to excellent ratings. In contrast, the mortality relationship with age-comparative and self-comparative SRH was moderated by age, revealing that these comparative SRH measures did not independently predict mortality for adults over 75 years of age in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS We found that a global measure of SRH not referenced to age or self is the best predictor of mortality, and is the most reliable measure of self-perceived health for longitudinal research and population health estimates of healthy life expectancy in older adults. Findings emphasize that the SRH measures are not equivalent measures of health status.This study was funded by the South Australian Health Commission, the Australian Rotary Health Research Fund, the US National Institute of Health (Grant No. AG 08523-02) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; Grant No.229936). KJA is supported by NHMRC Fellowship No.366756
Correlates of subjective health across the aging lifespan: understanding self-rated health in the oldest old
OBJECTIVES: To examine the determinants of self-rated health (SRH) in different age groups of older adults, including the oldest-old. METHODS: Variables assessing physical health, difficulty with self-care, depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment were pooled and harmonised from three Australian longitudinal studies of ageing (n=5,222). The association of these with SRH was examined in older adults aged 60-64 years, 65-74 years, 75-84 years and 85 years and older. RESULTS: SRH was not associated with cognitive impairment or difficulty with self-care in the oldest-old, and its association with physical health was diminished compared with younger groups. Depression showed a significant relationship in all age groups, conferring an approximately fourfold increase in the likelihood of poorer SRH. DISCUSSION: As old age progresses, self-reports of poor health become most closely related to psychological symptoms. This explains some of the paradoxes of past literature and offers important insights for health professionals working with the oldest-old.National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC); Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR
Cross-national insights into the relationship between wealth and wellbeing: a comparison between Australia, the United States of America and South Korea
The positive relationship between wealth and wellbeing has received considerable attention over the last three decades. However, little is known about how the significance of wealth for the health and wellbeing of older adults may vary across societies. Furthermore, researchers tend to focus mainly on income rather than other aspects of financial resources even though older adults often rely on fixed income, particularly after retirement. Using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey (N=1,431), the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, N=4,687), and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (KLoSA, N=5,447), this exploratory cross-national study examined the relationship between wealth satisfaction and objective wealth and wellbeing (measured as self-rated health and life satisfaction) among older Australians, Americans and Koreans (50+ years). Regression analyses showed that wealth satisfaction was associated with wellbeing over and above monetary wealth in all three countries. The relationship between monetary wealth and self-rated health was larger for the United States of America (USA) than Australian and Korean samples, while the additional contribution of wealth satisfaction to life satisfaction was larger for the Korean than the Australian and USA samples. These findings are discussed in terms of the cultural and economic differences between these countries, particularly as they affect older persons.This research was funded through a grant. - Sarang Kim was supported by ARC/NHMRC Research Network in Ageing Well, Davina French by NHMRC Project Grant No. 410215 and Kaarin Anstey by NHMRC Research Fellowship No. 366756
A simple measure with complex determinants: investigation of the correlates of self-rated health in older men and women from three continents
Self-rated health is commonly employed in research studies that seek to assess the health status of
older individuals. Perceptions of health are, however, influenced by individual and societal level factors that may
differ within and between countries. This study investigates levels of self-rated health (SRH) and correlates of SRH
among older adults in Australia, United States of America (USA), Japan and South Korea.
We conclude that when examining correlates of SRH, the similarities are greater than the differences
between countries. There are however differences in levels of SRH which are not fully accounted for by the health
correlates. Broad generalizations about styles of responding are not helpful for understanding these differences,
which appear to be country- and possibly cohort-specific. When using SRH to characterize the health status of older
people, it is important to consider earlier life experiences of cohorts as well as national and individual factors in
later life. Further research is required to understand the complex societal influences on perceptions of health.The Australian data on which this research is based were drawn from several
Australian longitudinal studies including: the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ALSA), the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health
(ALSWH) and the Personality And Total Health Through Life Study (PATH).
These studies were pooled and harmonized for the Dynamic Analyses to
Optimize Ageing (DYNOPTA) project. DYNOPTA was funded by a National
Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant (# 410215)
The choice of self-rated health measures matter when predicting mortality: evidence from 10 years follow-up of the Australian longitudinal study of ageing
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-rated health (SRH) measures with different wording and reference points are often used as equivalent health indicators in public health surveys estimating health outcomes such as healthy life expectancies and mortality for older adults. Whilst the robust relationship between SRH and mortality is well established, it is not known how comparable different SRH items are in their relationship to mortality over time. We used a dynamic evaluation model to investigate the sensitivity of time-varying SRH measures with different reference points to predict mortality in older adults over time.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used seven waves of data from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (1992 to 2004; N = 1733, 52.6% males). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between three time-varying SRH measures (global, age-comparative and self-comparative reference point) with mortality in older adults (65+ years).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After accounting for other mortality risk factors, poor global SRH ratings increased mortality risk by 2.83 times compared to excellent ratings. In contrast, the mortality relationship with age-comparative and self-comparative SRH was moderated by age, revealing that these comparative SRH measures did not independently predict mortality for adults over 75 years of age in adjusted models.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found that a global measure of SRH not referenced to age or self is the best predictor of mortality, and is the most reliable measure of self-perceived health for longitudinal research and population health estimates of healthy life expectancy in older adults. Findings emphasize that the SRH measures are not equivalent measures of health status.</p
Association of cognitive function with glucose tolerance and trajectories of glucose tolerance over 12 years in the AusDiab study
The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies,
expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling
for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least .
With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000
people realized that vision as the James Webb Space Telescope. A
generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of
the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the
scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000
team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image
quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief
history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing
program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite
detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.Comment: Accepted by PASP for the special issue on The James Webb Space
Telescope Overview, 29 pages, 4 figure
Role of physical activity in the relationship between mastery and functional health
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine the influence of mastery, physical activity levels, and subsequent trajectories of domains of functional health across the adult life course. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined 8-year trajectories of physical functioning (handgrip strength) and functional health (physical [RAND PHC12], psychological [RAND MHC12], and cognitive [processing speed]) in a large Australian sample (n = 7,485 at baseline) of 3 cohorts (20–24, 40–44, and 60–64 years). Within- and between-person indirect effects of physical activity on the relationship between mastery and health were examined using multilevel structural equation models. RESULTS: Mastery was positively related to within-person change in physical and psychological health for all cohorts, and processing speed for the 60s. Between-person mastery was positively associated with all health domains across all cohorts. Physical activity indirectly influenced the between-person relationships between mastery and handgrip strength, physical health, and psychological health in all cohorts, and between mastery and processing speed for the 60s. IMPLICATIONS: Psychological resources are important mechanisms for functional health as they may drive adaptive behaviors such as physical activity. The within-person association connecting mastery with physical and psychological health trajectories provides promise for interventions that foster or improve a sense of mastery. The findings contribute to the understanding of complex relationships between personal resources and behaviors that aid in successful aging across the life span.This study was supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Grants No. 973302, 179805, 350833, 157125, and 568969. KA is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowship No. 1002560. KS-C is funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research
Longitudinal Change of Self-Perceptions of Ageing and Mortality
Objective.To understand the association between self-perceptions of aging (SPA) and mortality in late life.Method.The sample (n = 1,507) was drawn from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging (baseline age = 65-103 years). We used joint growth curve and survival models on 5 waves of data for a period of 16 years to investigate the random intercept and slope of SPA for predicting all-cause mortality.Results.The unadjusted model revealed that poor SPA at baseline, as well as decline in SPA, increased the risk of mortality (SPA intercept hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.31; SPA slope HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.33). This relationship remained significant for the SPA intercept after adjusting for other risk factors including demographics, physical health, cognitive functioning, and well-being.Conclusion.These findings suggest that a single measurement of SPA in late life may be very informative of future long-Term vulnerability to health decline and mortality. Furthermore, a dynamic measure of SPA may be indicative of adaptation to age-related changes. This supports a "self- fulfilling" hypothesis, whereby SPA is a lens through which age-related changes are interpreted, and these interpretations can affect future health and health behaviors