54 research outputs found

    Optimisation of building energy retrofit strategies using dynamic exergy analysis and exergoeconomics

    Get PDF
    Existing buildings represent one of the most energy intensive sectors in today’s society, where comprehensive building energy retrofit (BER) strategies play a major role in achieving national reduction targets. Despite the efforts made in recent decades through policies and programmes to improve building energy efficiency, the building sector (which proportionally has the highest demand for heat) has the lowest thermodynamic efficiency among all UK economic sectors. As other sectors have shown, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses can be indispensable tools for the design and optimisation of energy systems. Therefore, there is a need for modification of existing BER methods in order to include thermodynamic analysis with the aim improve true efficiency of buildings and minimise its environmental impact. However, a paradigm shift represents a big challenge to common building practice as traditional methods have prioritised typical energy and economic objectives. The aim of this thesis is to develop a methodological framework for the evaluation of BER strategies under exergy analysis and exergoeconomic accounting supported with the integration of the calculation framework into a typical dynamic building simulation tool. There are two original contributions to the knowledge of this research. First, the techno-economic appraisal of BER strategies, based on the typical energy-efficient and cost-benefit method, is enhanced by adding a whole-building exergy analysis combined with an exergoeconomic method (SPECO). Second, ExRET-Opt, a retrofit-oriented simulation tool based on dynamic exergy calculations and exergoeconomic analysis combined with a comprehensive and robust retrofit database, is developed and implemented for this research. In addition, a multi-objective optimisation module based on genetic algorithms is included within the simulation framework in order to improve BER design under different thermodynamic and non-thermodynamic conflicting cost objective functions. Three UK non-domestic case studies implementing a wide range of active and passive retrofit strategies are presented. Results suggest that under identical economic and technical constraints, the inclusion of exergy/exergoeconomic indicators as objective functions into the optimisation procedure has resulted in buildings with similar energy and thermal comfort performance as traditional First Law methods; while providing solutions with better thermodynamic performance and less environmental impact. The approach also demonstrates to provide BER designs with an appropriate balance between active and passive measures, while consistently accounting of irreversibilities and its costs along every subsystem in the building energy system. The developed framework/tool seems like a promising approach to introduce the Second Law into typical building energy practice and for the development of policies, incentives, and taxes based on exergy destruction footprints. Such policies could help highly thermodynamically-efficient or low exergy BER designs to become widely available

    Parametric study and simulation-based exergy optimization for energy retrofits in buildings

    Get PDF
    The undertaking of building energy retrofits is essential for the reduction of energy use and carbon emissions at a national level. Nowadays, a number of construction methods and energy technologies that are available to practitioners require that the appropriate retrofit solution is identified to ensure long-term project success. A significant limitation of conventional methods that may be used to examine this (e.g. scenario by scenario) is that only a limited number of design scenarios can be evaluated which limits the potential for identifying the “best” designs. Furthermore, while the building sector has a large thermodynamic potential where most of the buildings' energy demands (especially space conditioning) can be met by low-grade sources, the associated exergy analysis method is rarely used in architectural practice. The following paper presents a simulation-based exergy optimization model, which aims to assess the impact of a diverse range of retrofit measures. Two non-domestic UK archetype case studies (a typical office and a primary school) are used to test the feasibility of the proposed framework. The objective optimization functions in this study are building energy use, exergy destructions throughout the building energy supply chain, and improvement of occupants’ thermal comfort levels. Different measures combinations based on retrofitting the insulation levels of the envelope and the application of different HVAC systems configurations (VAV, VRF, ground-source heat pump, air-source heat pump, district heating/cooling systems) are assessed. A large range of optimal solutions were achieved highlighting the framework capabilities. This approach can be extended by using the outputs in cost-benefit analysis and in thermoeconomic optimization

    A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design

    Get PDF
    This study presents a comparison of the optimisation of building energy retrofit strategies from two different perspectives: an energy/economic-based analysis and an exergy/exergoeconomic-based analysis. A recently retrofitted community centre is used as a case study. ExRET-Opt, a novel building energy/exergy simulation tool with multi-objective optimisation capabilities based on NSGA-II is used to run both analysis. The first analysis, based on the 1st Law only, simultaneously optimises building energy use and design's Net Present Value (NPV). The second analysis, based on the 1st and the 2nd Laws, simultaneously optimises exergy destructions and the exergoeconomic cost-benefit index. Occupant thermal comfort is considered as a common objective function for both approaches. The aim is to assess the difference between the methods and calculate the performance among main indicators, considering the same decision variables and constraints. Outputs show that the inclusion of exergy/exergoeconomics as objective functions into the optimisation procedure has resulted in similar 1st Law and thermal comfort outputs, while providing solutions with less environmental impact under similar capital investments. This outputs demonstrate how the 1st Law is only a necessary calculation while the utilisation of the 1st and 2nd Laws becomes a sufficient condition for the analysis and design of low carbon buildings
    • 

    corecore