8 research outputs found

    ITS Version 6 : the integrated TIGER series of coupled electron/photon Monte Carlo transport codes.

    Get PDF
    ITS is a powerful and user-friendly software package permitting state-of-the-art Monte Carlo solution of lineartime-independent coupled electron/photon radiation transport problems, with or without the presence of macroscopic electric and magnetic fields of arbitrary spatial dependence. Our goal has been to simultaneously maximize operational simplicity and physical accuracy. Through a set of preprocessor directives, the user selects one of the many ITS codes. The ease with which the makefile system is applied combines with an input scheme based on order-independent descriptive keywords that makes maximum use of defaults and internal error checking to provide experimentalists and theorists alike with a method for the routine but rigorous solution of sophisticated radiation transport problems. Physical rigor is provided by employing accurate cross sections, sampling distributions, and physical models for describing the production and transport of the electron/photon cascade from 1.0 GeV down to 1.0 keV. The availability of source code permits the more sophisticated user to tailor the codes to specific applications and to extend the capabilities of the codes to more complex applications. Version 6, the latest version of ITS, contains (1) improvements to the ITS 5.0 codes, and (2) conversion to Fortran 90. The general user friendliness of the software has been enhanced through memory allocation to reduce the need for users to modify and recompile the code

    LDRD project 151362 : low energy electron-photon transport.

    Get PDF
    At sufficiently high energies, the wavelengths of electrons and photons are short enough to only interact with one atom at time, leading to the popular %E2%80%9Cindependent-atom approximation%E2%80%9D. We attempted to incorporate atomic structure in the generation of cross sections (which embody the modeled physics) to improve transport at lower energies. We document our successes and failures. This was a three-year LDRD project. The core team consisted of a radiation-transport expert, a solid-state physicist, and two DFT experts

    The Stopping Power for Structured Atomic Projectiles in Cold Or Ionized Solids.

    Full text link
    A model has been developed to evaluate the stopping power for structured (not fully stripped) ion projectiles in cold (neutral) or ionized targets. The dominant contribution is computed in the local plasma approximation (LPA) which averages the stopping power of a free-electron gas (FEG) over the electron distribution of the target. Projectile structure is introduced by taking into account the charge distribution about the intruding ion. Corrections for treating the target as a local FEG are treated through a binding parameter and comparison to an alternate atomic-target formulation. The binding parameter is observed to scale in size with the degree of target ionization. Secondary corrections (Barkas and Bloch terms, to correct for departures from pure Rutherford scattering and from plane wave scattering, respectively) are also included. Projectile structure is treated only approximately through point effective charges. Two alternate derivations of the Bloch correction are seen to yield consistent results. Two forms of the Barkas term are considered: one including contributions from close collisions while the other does not. Inclusion of the Bloch correction limits the results to velocities which depend on both the projectile and target. Various projectile-target combinations have been calculated. The results deviate from st and ard tabulations by at most about 15% (often much less). This indicates it is possible to incorporate the actual projectile charge states in the stopping power formulae. The scaling of the binding parameter with target ionization restores some confidence in the LPA for use in ionized targets. The difference in treating the projectile as truly structured or as simply a point charge are not great for the ionized targets considered since the terms arising from true projectile structure tend to offset the difference.Ph.D.Nuclear engineeringUniversity of Michiganhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/161113/1/8621310.pd
    corecore