Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions

The effectiveness of and adherence to eHealth interventions is enhanced by human support. However, human support has largely not been manualized and has usually not been guided by clear models. The objective of this paper is to develop a clear theoretical model, based on relevant empirical literature, that can guide research into human support components of eHealth interventions. A review of the literature revealed little relevant information from clinical sciences. Applicable literature was drawn primarily from organizational psychology, motivation theory, and computer-mediated communication (CMC) research. We have developed a model, referred to as “Supportive Accountability.” We argue that human support increases adherence through accountability to a coach who is seen as trustworthy, benevolent, and having expertise. Accountability should involve clear, process-oriented expectations that the patient is involved in determining. Reciprocity in the relationship, through which the patient derives clear benefits, should be explicit. The effect of accountability may be moderated by patient motivation. The more intrinsically motivated patients are, the less support they likely require. The process of support is also mediated by the communications medium (eg, telephone, instant messaging, email). Different communications media each have their own potential benefits and disadvantages. We discuss the specific components of accountability, motivation, and CMC medium in detail. The proposed model is a first step toward understanding how human support enhances adherence to eHealth interventions. Each component of the proposed model is a testable hypothesis. As we develop viable human support models, these should be manualized to facilitate dissemination

Fatores preditores de resultados no tratamento do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo com as terapias comportamental e cognitivo-comportamental: uma revisão sistemática Outcome predictor factors in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder using behavior and cognitive-behavior therapies: a systematic review

INTRODUÇÃO: As terapias comportamental e cognitivo-comportamental reduzem os sintomas do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo em mais de 70% dos pacientes. Entretanto, cerca de 30% não obtêm nenhuma melhora. Conhecer fatores associados a esses desfechos poderia auxiliar numa melhor indicação do tratamento, incrementando sua eficácia. MÉTODO: Foram revisados trabalhos que investigaram fatores preditivos de resultados nos tratamentos do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo, nas fontes PubMed, PsycINFO e LILACS. Termos utilizados na busca: predictive factors OR prediction AND obsessive-compulsive disorder AND exposure response prevention OR ritual prevention OR behav* therapy OR cognitive behav* therapy, resultando em 104 artigos. As referências dos artigos foram analisadas, possibilitando maior número de trabalhos revisados. Excluíram-se artigos que utilizaram apenas farmacoterapia e aqueles que não abordavam o tema, resultando em 29 artigos. DISCUSSÃO: As variáveis demográficas parecem exercer papel indireto, destacando-se sexo masculino e ausência de companheiro(a) como fatores de pior prognóstico. Maior gravidade e início precoce dos sintomas indicariam piores resultados. O transtorno esquizotípico comórbido é potencialmente negativo. Sintomas relacionados ao colecionismo e com conteúdo sexual/religioso indicam pior prognóstico. Maior nível de insight, motivação e colaboração com o tratamento são características favoráveis. Maior intensidade da melhora e a remissão completa são preditores para a não-recaída. CONCLUSÃO: A identificação de fatores preditores de resultados está longe de ser esclarecida. É possível que múltiplos fatores, cujas associações são complexas, atuem em conjunto. Os resultados podem depender de fatores não-específicos, ainda não abordados pelos estudos. A heterogeneidade do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo e das pesquisas e o uso associado de medicamentos dificultam o estabelecimento de conclusões mais definidas.<br>INTRODUCTION: Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapies reduce symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder in over 70% of patients. However, about 30% do not show any improvement. The knowledge of factors associated with these outcomes may inform better treatment indications and improve treatment efficacy. METHOD: Review of studies that investigated predictors of obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment results in PubMed, PsychoINFO and LILACS databases. Terms used in the search were predictive factors OR prediction AND obsessive-compulsive disorder AND exposure response prevention OR ritual prevention OR behav* therapy OR cognitive behav* therapy." The search retrieved 104 studies. The references of retrieved studies were also analyzed to ensure that all relevant studies were included. Studies that used only pharmacotherapy or did not discuss the topic under analysis were excluded, and 29 studies met inclusion criteria. DISCUSSION: Demographic variables seem to play an indirect role in treatment results; male sex and not having partner are factors associated with poor prognosis. Greater severity and early symptom onset also indicate poor outcomes. Comorbid schizotypal disorder is potentially negative. Symptoms associated with hoarding and sexual/religious obsessions predict poor prognosis. Greater insight, motivation and collaboration with treatment are favorable characteristics. Greater improvement and complete remission of symptoms are predictors of no relapse. CONCLUSION: The identification of outcome predictors is still far from complete. Multiple factors may contribute to results, and their associations are complex. Results may depend on unspecific factors not yet investigated. Definite conclusions are difficult to reach because of the heterogeneity of obsessive-compulsive disorder and of the studies investigating it and the combined use of drugs

The Socratic Method in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Narrative Review

The Socratic Method has been described as an important component of CBT interventions yet an empirical case for its use has not been made. The objective of this paper is to review the role of the Socratic Method in CBT in four stages. First, a review of the literature describes how the Socratic Method is applied and defined within CBT, with assumptions regarding its proposed benefits identified. Second, a review of empirical literature demonstrates that multiple challenges to the evaluation of the Socratic Method exist and that no direct evidence supports the premise that it is beneficial in CBT. Evidence is examined which may suggest why the Socratic Method could be beneficial in therapy. Finally, the hypothesised function of the Socratic Method within therapy is discussed in reference to the Interacting Cognitive Subsystems framework. A number of avenues for future research are proposed in order to determine whether this potentially valuable therapeutic component contributes to the efficacy of CBT