Cryopreserved homograft valves in the pulmonary position: Risk analysis for intermediate-term failure

AbstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to examine the durability of cryopreserved homografts used to replace the “pulmonary” valve and to identify factors associated with their late deterioration. Methods: We reviewed our entire experience (1985-1997) with 331 survivors in whom cryopreserved homograft valves (pulmonary, n = 304; aortic, n = 27) were used to reconstruct the pulmonary outflow tract. Median age was 14 years (range, 2 days–62 years). Operations included Ross operation (n = 259), tetralogy of Fallot (n = 41), truncus arteriosus (n = 14), Rastelli operation (n = 11), and others (n = 6). Median follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0.2–11.2 years); late echographic follow-up was complete for 97% of patients. Homograft failure was defined as the need for explantation and valve-related death; homograft dysfunction was defined as a pulmonary insufficiency grade 3/4 or greater and a transvalvular gradient of 40 mm Hg or greater. Results: Homograft failure occurred in 9% (30 of 331 patients; Kaplan-Meier); freedom from failure was 82% ± 4% at 8 years. Homograft dysfunction occurred in 12% (39 of 331 patients), although freedom from dysfunction was 76% ± 4% at 8 years. For aortic homografts, this was 56% ± 11%, compared to 80% ± 4% for pulmonary homografts (P = .003). For patients aged less than 3 years (n = 38), this was 51% ± 12%, compared with 87% ± 4% for older patients (P = .0001). By multivariable analysis, younger age of homograft donors, non-Ross operation, and later year of operation were associated with homograft failure; younger age of homograft donors, later year of operation, and use of an aortic homograft were associated with homograft dysfunction. Conclusions: Homograft valves function satisfactorily in the pulmonary position at mid-term follow-up. The pulmonary homograft valve appears to be more durable than the aortic homograft valve in the pulmonary position. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:141-7

Improved long-term performance of pulsatile extracorporeal left ventricular assist device

SummaryBackground and purposeThe majority of heart transplant (HTx) candidates require left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support for more than 2 years before transplantation in Japan. However, the only currently available device is the extracorporeal pulsatile LVAD. The long-term management of extracorporeal LVAD support has improved remarkably over the years. To determine which post-operative management factors are related to the long-term survival of patients on such LVAD, we retrospectively compared the incidence of complications and their management strategies between the initial and recent eras of LVAD use, classified by the year of LVAD surgery.MethodsSixty-nine consecutive patients supported by extracorporeal pulsatile LVAD as a bridge to HTx between 1994 and 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were assigned according to the time of LVAD surgery to either group A (n=30; between 1994 and 2000) or group B (n=39; between 2001 and 2007).ResultsPatients in group B survived significantly longer on LVAD support than those in group A (674.6 vs. 369.3 days; p<0.001). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were significantly higher in group B than that in group A (82% vs. 48%, p<0.0001; 68% vs. 23%, p<0.0001, respectively). The proportion of deaths due to cerebrovascular accidents was lower (17% vs. 50%, p<0.001) in group B compared with group A. The incidences of systemic infection were similar in both groups, but the proportions of patients alive and achieving transplant surgery after systemic infection were higher in group B than those in group A (55% vs. 14%, p<0.01; 14% vs. 36%, p<0.05, respectively).ConclusionsThe long-term survival of patients even on “first-generation” extracorporeal LVAD has improved significantly in the recent era. Careful management of cerebrovascular accidents and systemic infection will play important roles in the long-term LVAD management

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Rapid Reversal of Warfarin-induced Anticoagulation and Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients Supported by a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most serious complications in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We evaluate the efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for rapid reversal of warfarin-induced anticoagulation in this population. Methods: A total of 38 consecutive ICH events in patients supported by an LVAD between 1996 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen ICH events were treated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (Group FFP) and 24 ICH events were treated with PCC (Group PCC). The efficacy and outcome of PCC administration versus FFP were evaluated. Results: The proportion of patients surviving after an ICH event was significantly smaller in Group FFP than Group PCC (35.7% vs. 75.0%, p < 0.05). None of the patients in Group FFP were able to undergo heart transplantation, whereas 21.4% patients in Group PCC successfully underwent heart transplantation. Conclusion: Patients on LVAD are in need for intensified anticoagulation and are at high risk of ICH; therefore, adequate use of PCC in the event of ICH could be of importance for survival and allow subsequent heart transplantation