6 research outputs found
Comparison of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) between joint-preserving arthroplasty and resection-replacement arthroplasty in forefoot surgery for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Objectives: To clarify the difference of patient-based outcome between joint-preserving arthroplasty and resection-replacement arthroplasty in forefoot surgery for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: A total of 63 feet of 49 RA patients who underwent forefoot surgery were asked to answer pre-operative and post-operative self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Patients were treated with either (1) metatarsal head resection-replacement arthroplasty (28 feet, post-operative mean age 63.8 years, follow-up 4.2 years, DAS28-CRP 2.2) or (2) metatarsophalangeal joint-preserving arthroplasty (35 feet, post-operative mean age 63.1 years, follow-up 3.6 years, DAS28-CRP 2.1) at each surgeon’s discretion. Results: Mean pre-operative and post-operative subscale scores of SAFE-Q of group (1) and (2) were as follows. Pain and pain-related [(1) pre-op 36.8 to post-op 75.0 vs. (2) pre-op 42.2 to post-op 82.6], physical functioning and daily-living [(1) 43.2–68.8 vs. (2) 52.778.1], social functioning [(1) 44.3–72.0 vs. (2) 52.5–81.9], general health and well-being [(1) 48.4–68.4 vs. (2) 45.5–84.4], and shoe-related [(1) 30.1–50.3 vs. (2) 30.6–64.4]. Both general health and well-being subscale scores (p < 0.05) and shoe-related subscale scores (p < 0.05) were significantly more improved in group (2) compared with group (1). Conclusions: Joint-preserving arthroplasty resulted in better patient-based outcomes than resection-replacement arthroplasty.Ebina K., Hirao M., Hashimoto J., et al. Comparison of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) between joint-preserving arthroplasty and resection-replacement arthroplasty in forefoot surgery for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Modern Rheumatology 27, 795 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2016.1259968
In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of total elbow arthroplasty using fluoroscopic imaging
Higher complication rates and lower survivorship are still seen for total elbow arthroplasties compared to total knee and hip arthroplasties. This is partly due to polyethylene wear of the articular surface induced by excessive articular contact stress during elbow motion. The aim of this study was to dynamically evaluate in vivo three-dimensional elbow motion after total elbow arthroplasty. Twelve patients (15 elbows) who underwent operation with the Osaka University Model Total Elbow System were analysed using X-ray fluoroscopic imaging and a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique, which could accurately estimate the three-dimensional spatial position of components. Valgus/varus angle and rotation between humeral and ulnar components showed wide variations among patients. Elbows with valgus angle and internal rotation >10° could induce edge-loading of the articular surface. Component alignment, articular configuration, and soft-tissue balance can affect the kinematics of total elbow arthroplasty