Insights into the Role of Meteorology on Improving Model-measurement Agreement of Oxidants in Forested Environments

Within forest canopies, biogenic emissions and anthropogenic pollutants interact through complex chemicalreactions, impacting atmospheric composition, climate, and ecosystem processes. The need to understand the biosphere-atmosphere exchange of heat, momentum, and chemical species has led to a significant body of work on the transport and fate of molecules within and above plant canopies. The impact of these canopies on the fast oxidation chemistry responsible for regulating the lifetime of greenhouse gases is still insufficiently understood. This is largely owing to the complexity of the chemical reactions involved and the lack of fully explicit physical descriptions of in-canopy turbulence and deposition. This thesis investigates the role that improved meteorological representation can play in reducing model error for simulated chemistry and improving our understanding of oxidation chemistry in forested environments. I examine long-term air quality monitoring data to show evidence that ozone mixing ratios in much of the United States are impacted by the presence of vegetation through the ability of plants to remove ozone from the atmosphere, and that this dry deposition sink is regulated by vapor pressure deficit. Examining the role of forest canopies in modulating chemistry further, I used the FORest Canopy Atmosphere Transfer (FORCAsT) model to simulate dynamics and reactions in a forest at the University of Michigan Biological Station (UMBS). I found that updating modeled meteorology by assimilating observations improves simulations of primary species, but key discrepancies in oxidation products exist, suggesting possible changes to branching ratios in the chemical mechanism may be needed. I use the micrometeorology measurements I made at the UMBS in conjunction with high resolution volatile organic compound (VOC) data to determine the impact of turbulence on VOCs, providing novel data for future model validation and parameterization. Further, I simulate the impact of turbulence on chemical reactions by incorporating the turbulence-induced covariance between chemical reactants in a box model and show that turbulent fluctuations strongly impact reactions involving short-lived radicals, leading to significant concentration changes, at canopy height. This work contributes to our understanding of the impact that meteorology plays on oxidation chemistry in and above forests.Ph.D

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 67 countries

Scientific information is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in science can help decision-makers act based on the best available evidence, especially during crises such as climate change or the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. Here we interrogated these concerns with a pre-registered 67-country survey of 71,417 respondents on all inhabited continents and find that in most countries, a majority of the public trust scientists and think that scientists should be more engaged in policymaking. We further show that there is a discrepancy between the public’s perceived and desired priorities of scientific research. Moreover, we find variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual-and country-level variables,including political orientation. While these results do not show widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 67 countries

Scientific information is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in science can help decision-makers act based on the best available evidence, especially during crises such as climate change or the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. Here we interrogated these concerns with a pre-registered 67-country survey of 71,417 respondents on all inhabited continents and find that in most countries, a majority of the public trust scientists and think that scientists should be more engaged in policymaking. We further show that there is a discrepancy between the public’s perceived and desired priorities of scientific research. Moreover, we find variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual-and country-level variables,including political orientation. While these results do not show widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists