578 research outputs found

    Elie Wiesel: the man and his legacy

    Full text link
    Accepted manuscript2020-11-3

    Knowledge regarding and patterns of genetic testing in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer participating in the iCanDecide trial

    Full text link
    BackgroundThe current study reports rates of knowledge regarding the probability of a BRCA1 and/or S pathogenic variant and genetic testing in patients with breast cancer, collected as part of a randomized controlled trial of a tailored, comprehensive, and interactive decision tool (iCanDecide).MethodsA total of 537 patients newly diagnosed with early‐stage breast cancer were enrolled at the time of their first visit in 22 surgical practices, and were surveyed 5 weeks (496 patients; Response Rate [RR], 92%) after enrollment after treatment decision making. Primary outcomes included knowledge regarding the probability of carrying a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant and genetic testing after diagnosis.ResultsOverall knowledge regarding the probability of having a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant was low (29.8%). Significantly more patients in the intervention group compared with the control group had knowledge regarding the probability of a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant (35.8% vs 24.4%; P <.006). In multivariable logistic regression, the intervention arm remained significantly associated with knowledge regarding the probability of having a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.18‐2.70).ConclusionsThe results of the current study suggest that although knowledge concerning the probability of having a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant remains low in this patient population, the interactive decision tool improved rates compared with a static Web site. As interest in genetic testing continues to rise, so will the need to integrate tools into the treatment decision process to improve informed decision making.As interest in genetic testing increases, so will the need to integrate tools into the treatment decision process. Results from the current study suggest that although knowledge regarding the probability of a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant remains low in this patient population, the interactive decision tool improved rates compared with a static Web site.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146553/1/cncr31731.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146553/2/cncr31731_am.pd

    The association between patient attitudes and values and the strength of consideration for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a population‐based sample of breast cancer patients

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140052/1/cncr30924_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140052/2/cncr30924.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140052/3/cncr30924-sup-0002-suppinfo.pd

    Report on the Third Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE3)

    Get PDF
    This report records and discusses the Third Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE3). The report includes a description of the keynote presentation of the workshop, which served as an overview of sustainable scientific software. It also summarizes a set of lightning talks in which speakers highlighted to-the-point lessons and challenges pertaining to sustaining scientific software. The final and main contribution of the report is a summary of the discussions, future steps, and future organization for a set of self-organized working groups on topics including developing pathways to funding scientific software; constructing useful common metrics for crediting software stakeholders; identifying principles for sustainable software engineering design; reaching out to research software organizations around the world; and building communities for software sustainability. For each group, we include a point of contact and a landing page that can be used by those who want to join that group's future activities. The main challenge left by the workshop is to see if the groups will execute these activities that they have scheduled, and how the WSSSPE community can encourage this to happen

    Decision‐support networks of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138904/1/cncr30848_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138904/2/cncr30848.pd

    Primary care provider–reported involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149227/1/cncr31998.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149227/2/cncr31998_am.pd

    Treatment experiences of Latinas after diagnosis of breast cancer

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138310/1/cncr30702.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138310/2/cncr30702_am.pd
    • 

    corecore