Workplace bullying in primary schools: teachers’ experience of workplace bullying; an organisational response perspective

The aim of this doctoral research is to contribute to the growing body of knowledge concerning workplace bullying by considering the help-seeking experiences of targets of bullying and organisational responses to their complaints. A phenomenological research design was adopted. Twenty-two Irish primary school teachers (7 male, 15 female) self-selected for interview. Data were analysed utilising an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis framework. All those interviewed had made complaints in accordance with the nationally agreed procedures stipulated to address workplace bullying in their schools. Redress procedures comprises several stages. All had engaged in stage one and two of the official complaints procedures; and all had availed of counselling, with most engaging with the recommended employee assistance service (formerly known as ‘Care Call’ now Medmark). Some participants had ceased engagement at stage 2, while others participants who had proceeded to stage three, ceased engagement at this juncture. Further participants proceeded to stage 4, of whom two are currently proscribed from returning to their posts due to ongoing disputes based upon retaliation for complaints, which comprised challenges to their fitness to work. It is significant that no participant expressed satisfaction with the outcome of exercising agency and engaging with redress procedures. In fact, complaints procedures served as technologies of power for bullies who launched counterattacks. This doctoral study traced the pre-action, action, response, and overall consequences for the teacher as the target of workplace bullying describing targets’ resistance within the context of complex social interactions and considered possible supportive, preventative, and resolution strategies. The resultant approach has wide-ranging implications for the present pernicious practices and it identified a number of proposals for professional practice and modifications in the way in which workplace bullying may be countered and contained. This thesis contributes to discourses of agency in workplace bullying and challenges both researchers and policy-makers to fully elucidate the various issues surrounding pathways to redress for bullying. In addition through its emphasis on the power dynamics which characterize redress it extends the limited available literature in the substantive area about the ineffectiveness of complaints procedures Moreover, despite the research limitation respecting the modest scale of the study involving self-selecting teachers, the richness of the data elicited underscores the problematic and contingent assumptions underpinning anti-bullying policies and procedures which purportedly address workplace bullying within small organisations

Innovation in digital publishing in the humanities

There is an abundance of innovative publishing happening within the humanities, much of which is enabled by open access. The Wellcome Trust and New York Academy of Medicine present a session which will:1 - explore and celebrate the new ways humanities researchers are working and creating literature;2 - discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with experimental research that makes use of digital technologies and new publication methods; 3 - consider how open access affects these activities and historical practice more broadly.The Wellcome Trust has recently turned its attention towards facilitating and promoting open access in the humanities; Cecy Marden will discuss what the Trust has been doing, and the reaction they have received from researchers and publishers. Dr. Martin Eve co-founded the Open Library for Humanities (OLH) as he saw a need for a sustainable Open Access publishing platform in the humanities. Martin will discuss some of the challenges and opportunities associated with launching OLH. Prof. Matthew Gold, City Tech and CUNY, will talk about his work on Debates in the Digital Humanities, a publication project with the University of Minnesota Press that began as a printed book with an online open-access edition, and that has morphed into a dynamic, hybrid print/digital book series. Lisa Norberg, Barnard College Library, will propose an alternative business model for publishing and preserving open access research, from all disciplines in any format, which has learned societies at its centre. Finally, Prof. Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Modern Language Association (MLA), will share her experience of developing MLA Commons, a platform providing new avenues for scholarly communication and collaboration for members of MLA. Kathleen will also place MLA Commons within the context of open access and the future of scholarly societies more broadly. The session will be chaired by Dr. Stephen Robertson, Professor and Director of Roy Rosenzweig Center for History & New Media, George Mason University.The diverse views and experience these speakers bring to the session will help illuminate new research practices, and the business models and policies which lie behind them. Members of the audience will then be encouraged to join the discussion to consider and debate how open access, with all the changes and possibilities it brings, will transform historical practice.</p