Can postoperative mean transprosthetic pressure gradient predict survival after aortic valve replacement?

BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to determine the effect of the mean transprosthetic pressure gradient (TPG), measured at 6 weeks after aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on late all-cause mortality. METHODS: Between January 1998 and March 2012, 2,276 patients (mean age 68 ± 11 years) underwent TPG analysis at 6 weeks after AVR (n = 1,318) or AVR with CABG (n = 958) at a single institution. Mean TPG was 11.6 ± 7.8 mmHg and median TPG 11 mmHg. Based on the TPG, the patients were split into three groups: patients with a low TPG (<10 mmHg), patients with a medium TPG (10–19 mmHg) and patients with a high TPG (≥20 mmHg). Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was used to determine univariate predictors and multivariate independent predictors of late mortality. RESULTS: Overall survival for the entire group at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 97, 93, 87 and 67 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with a low, medium or high TPG (p = 0.258). Independent predictors of late mortality included age, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of a cerebrovascular accident and cardiopulmonary bypass time. Prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM), severe PPM and TPG measured at 6 weeks postoperatively were not significantly associated with late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TPG measured at 6 weeks after AVR or AVR with CABG is not an independent predictor of all-cause late mortality and there is no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with a low, medium or high TPG

Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND: Acute type B aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency with considerable mortality and morbidity risk. Male-female differences have been observed in cardiovascular disease; however, literature on type B aortic dissection is scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection between 2007 and 2017 in 4 tertiary hospitals using patient files and questionnaires for late morbidity. In total, 384 patients were included with a follow-up of 6.1 (range, 0.02-14.8) years, of which 41% (n=156) were female. Women presented at an older age than men (67 [interquartile range (IQR), 57-73] versus 62 [IQR, 52-71]; P=0.015). Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% versus 15%; P=0.009), distally extending dissections (71 versus 85%; P=0.001), and clinical malperfusion (18% versus 32%; P=0.002) were less frequently observed in women. Absolute maximal descending aortic diameters were smaller in women (36 [IQR: 33-40] mm versus 39 [IQR, 36-43] mm; P&lt;0.001), while indexed for body surface area diameters were larger in women (20 [IQR, 18-23] mm/m2 versus 19 [IQR, 17-21] mm/m2). No male-female differences were found in treatment choice; however, indications for invasive treatment were different (P&lt;0.001). Early mortality rate was 9.6% in women and 11.8% in men (P=0.60). The 5-year survival was 83% (95% CI, 77-89) for women and 84% (95% CI, 79-89) for men (P=0.90). No male-female differences were observed in late (re)interventions. CONCLUSIONS: No male-female differences were found in management, early or late death, and morbidity in patients presenting with acute type B aortic dissection, despite distinct clinical profiles at presentation. More details on the impact of age and type of intervention are warranted in future studies.</p

Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND: Acute type B aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency with considerable mortality and morbidity risk. Male-female differences have been observed in cardiovascular disease; however, literature on type B aortic dissection is scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection between 2007 and 2017 in 4 tertiary hospitals using patient files and questionnaires for late morbidity. In total, 384 patients were included with a follow-up of 6.1 (range, 0.02-14.8) years, of which 41% (n=156) were female. Women presented at an older age than men (67 [interquartile range (IQR), 57-73] versus 62 [IQR, 52-71]; P=0.015). Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% versus 15%; P=0.009), distally extending dissections (71 versus 85%; P=0.001), and clinical malperfusion (18% versus 32%; P=0.002) were less frequently observed in women. Absolute maximal descending aortic diameters were smaller in women (36 [IQR: 33-40] mm versus 39 [IQR, 36-43] mm; P&lt;0.001), while indexed for body surface area diameters were larger in women (20 [IQR, 18-23] mm/m2 versus 19 [IQR, 17-21] mm/m2). No male-female differences were found in treatment choice; however, indications for invasive treatment were different (P&lt;0.001). Early mortality rate was 9.6% in women and 11.8% in men (P=0.60). The 5-year survival was 83% (95% CI, 77-89) for women and 84% (95% CI, 79-89) for men (P=0.90). No male-female differences were observed in late (re)interventions. CONCLUSIONS: No male-female differences were found in management, early or late death, and morbidity in patients presenting with acute type B aortic dissection, despite distinct clinical profiles at presentation. More details on the impact of age and type of intervention are warranted in future studies.</p

Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND: Acute type B aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency with considerable mortality and morbidity risk. Male–female differences have been observed in cardiovascular disease; however, literature on type B aortic dissection is scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection between 2007 and 2017 in 4 tertiary hospitals using patient files and questionnaires for late morbidity. In total, 384 patients were included with a follow-up of 6.1 (range, 0.02–14.8) years, of which 41% (n=156) were female. Women presented at an older age than men (67 [interquartile range (IQR), 57–73] versus 62 [IQR, 52–71]; P=0.015). Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% versus 15%; P=0.009), distally extending dissections (71 versus 85%; P=0.001), and clinical malperfusion (18% versus 32%; P=0.002) were less frequently observed in women. Absolute maximal descending aortic diameters were smaller in women (36 [IQR: 33–40] mm versus 39 [IQR, 36–43] mm; P<0.001), while indexed for body surface area diameters were larger in women (20 [IQR, 18–23] mm/m2 versus 19 [IQR, 17–21] mm/m2). No male–female differences were found in treatment choice; however, indications for invasive treatment were different (P<0.001). Early mortality rate was 9.6% in women and 11.8% in men (P=0.60). The 5-year survival was 83% (95% CI, 77–89) for women and 84% (95% CI, 79–89) for men (P=0.90). No male–female differences were observed in late (re)interventions. CONCLUSIONS: No male–female differences were found in management, early or late death, and morbidity in patients presenting with acute type B aortic dissection, despite distinct clinical profiles at presentation. More details on the impact of age and type of intervention are warranted in future studies

Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow reserve in the right gastroepiploic artery graft

Background. To investigate the functional capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft (GEA) and its ability to adapt to provide adequate flow at peak myocardial demand, we investigated the feasibility of determining coronary flow reserve (CFR) provided by this vessel using transabdominal color Doppler echocardiography and the correlation between this noninvasive determination of flow reserve and nuclear stress scintigraphy. Methods. In 40 selected patients, who underwent complete arterial myocardial revascularization using the GEA and the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs), CFR of the GEA was measured at maximum coronary hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine infusion, 7 months (range 3 to 20) after surgery. In the same period, in 31 of this group of patients, exercise thallium scintigraphy was performed. Results. We succeeded in measuring CFR in 37 of 40 patients with values ranging from 1.1 to 3.6 with an average of 2.1 ± 0.7. During adenosine infusion, mean velocity in the GEA significantly increased from 48 ± 20 to 89 ± 41 cm/sec (p ≤ 0.001), mean arterial blood pressure significantly decreased from 96 ± 11 to 87 ± 11 mm Hg (p ≤ 0.001), and heart rate significantly increased from 74 ± 11 to 87 ± 15 beats/min (p ≤ 0.001). In 8 of these 37 patients, the nuclear exercise test was positive (compatible with reversible ischemia in the distribution area of the GEA). Average CFR in these 8 patients with positive nuclear stress test was 1.46 ± 0.28 versus 2.27 ± 0.70 in those patients with a negative test (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions. Noninvasive determination of CFR of GEAs is feasible, using transabdominal Doppler echocardiography. The present study shows that coronary vasodilator reserve and autoregulation is maintained in myocardium supplied by the GEA and that the CFR has a significant correlation with the results of noninvasive nuclear exercise testing. Therefore, noninvasive determination of CFR by transabdominal Doppler echocardiography might be a valuable contribution to functional assessment of GEAs

Giant coronary aneurysm exposed on routine echocardiogram

Not available

Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? : A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement

The optimal revascularization strategy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes after selective PCI of only hemodynamically significant lesions (fractional flow reserve, or FFR < 0.75) to CABG of all stenoses in patients with MVD. In 150 patients with MVD referred for CABG, FFR was determined in 381 coronary arteries considered for bypass grafting. If the FFR was less than 0.75 in three vessels or in two vessels including the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery, CABG was performed (CABG group). If only one or two vessels were physiologically significant (not including the proximal LAD), PCI of those lesions was performed (PCI group). Of the 150 patients, 87 fulfilled the criteria for CABG and 63 for PCI. There were no significant differences in the angiographic or other baseline characteristics between the two groups. At 2-year follow-up, no differences were seen in adverse events, including repeat revascularization (event-free survival 74% in the CABG group and 72% in the PCI group). A similar number of patients were free from angina (84% in the CABG group and 82% in the PCI group). Importantly, the results in both groups were as good as the surgical groups in previous studies comparing PCI and CABG in MVD. In patients with multivessel disease, PCI in those with one or two hemodynamically significant lesions as identified by an FFR < 0.75 yields a similar favorable outcome as CABG in those with three or more culprit lesions despite a similar angiographic extent of disease

Comparison of drug-eluting and Bare-metal stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention with or without Abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction DEBATER : the Eindhoven Reperfusion Study

Objectives The goal of this study was to demonstrate superiority of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) over baremetal stents (BMS) and of abciximab over no abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background Drug-eluting stents (DES) are increasingly used in primary PCI, but the recommendations for use in primary PCI are based on a few randomized controlled trials with selected patients. The usefulness of abciximab in primary PCI is not established. Methods Nine hundred seven patients referred to the Catharina Hospital were randomized to SES or BMS, and to abciximab or no abciximab in a prospective, randomized, open 2 X 2 factorial trial with blinded evaluation. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat revascularization, and bleeding at 1 year (stent arm) and the composite of death, target vessel MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and bleeding at 30 days (abciximab arm). Results At 1 year, the rate of MACCE was lower in the SES arm (16.5% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001), mainly driven by less repeat revascularization (9.8% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.003) and without influencing the cumulative incidence of death and MI (5.2% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.68). At 30 days, the rate of the composite of death, target vessel MI, TVR, and bleeding was lower in the abciximab arm (8.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.04), mainly driven by less TVR due to less stent thrombosis (1.2% vs.7.4%, p <0.001). However, bleeding complications occurred more frequently in the abciximab group (5.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). Conclusions Primary PCI with SES reduces adverse events at 1 year, mainly by reduction of repeat revascularization, whereas abciximab reduces early stent thrombosis, at the expense of more bleeding complications. (Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents With or Without Abciximab in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [DEBATER]; NCT00986050) (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:313-22) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundatio