4 research outputs found

    An adaptive 4-week robotic training program of the upper limb for persons with multiple sclerosis

    Get PDF
    It is suggested that repetitive movements can initiate motor recovery and improve motor learning in populations with neurological impairments and this process can be optimized with robotic devices. The repetitive, reproducible and high dose motor movements that can be delivered by robotics have shown positive results in functional outcomes in stroke patients. However, there is little research on robotic neurorehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), more specifically there is lack of literature with focus on the upper extremity. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to use a robotic device to implement an adaptive training program of the forearm and wrist for PwMS. This approach is unique, as it incorporates real time learning from the robotic device to alter the level of assistance/resistance to the individual. This methodology is novel and could prove to be an effective way to properly individualize the therapy process with correct dosage and prescription. 7 individuals with varying levels of MS, placed their most affected limb (forearm) on a robotic device (Wristbot), grasped the handle, and using real-time visual feedback, traced a Lissajous curve allowing the wrist to move in flexion/extension, radial/ulnar directions. Robotic training occurred 3 times per week for 4 consecutive weeks and included 40 minutes of work. Robotic software was adaptive and updated every 3 laps to evaluate the average kinematic performance which modified the robotic assistance/resistance. Outcome measures were taken pre and post intervention. Improvements in performance were quantified by average tracking and figural error, which was significantly reduced from pre – post intervention. Isometric wrist strength and grip force endurance also significantly improved from pre to post intervention. However, maximum grip force, joint position matching, 9-hole peg test, and patient-rated wrist evaluation did not show any significant improvements. To our knowledge, this study was the first adaptive and individualized robotic rehabilitation program providing two opposing forces to the hand/wrist for PwMS. Results of this 4-week training intervention, provide a proof-of-concept that motor control and muscular strength can be improved by this rehabilitation modality. This work acts as a stepping-stone into future investigations of robotic rehabilitation for an MS population

    Adaptations in Muscular Strength for Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis Following Robotic Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

    Get PDF
    Muscular weakness and loss of motor function are common symptoms of multiple sclerosis. Robotic rehabilitation can improve sensorimotor function and motor control in this population. However, many studies using robotics for rehabilitation have overlooked changes in muscular strength, despite research demonstrating its utility in combating functional impairments. The purpose of this scoping review was to critically examine changes in muscular strength following robotic rehabilitation interventions for individuals with multiple sclerosis. A literature search of five databases was conducted and search terms included a combination of three primary terms: robotic rehabilitation/training, muscular strength, and multiple sclerosis. Thirty one articles were found, and following inclusion criteria, 5 remained for further investigation. Although muscular strength was not the primary targeted outcome of the training for any of the included articles, increases in muscular strength were present in most of the studies suggesting that robotic therapy with a resistive load can be an effective alternative to resistance training for increasing muscular strength. Outcome measures of isometric knee-extensor force (kg) (right: p < 0.05, left: p < 0.05), isometric knee flexion and extension torque (Nm) (p < 0.05), ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion torque (Nm) (all p < 0.05) and handgrip force (kg) (p < 0.05) all improved following a robotic training intervention. These adaptations occurred with sustained low resistive loads of hand grip or during gait training. This scoping review concludes that, despite a lack of studies focusing on strength, there is evidence robotics is a useful modality to improve muscular strength in combination with motor control and neuromotor improvements. A call for more studies to document changes in strength during robotic rehabilitation protocols is warranted

    Preliminary evaluation of an adaptive robotic training program of the wrist for persons with multiple sclerosis

    Get PDF
    none5siRobotics can be used to describe wrist kinematics and assess sensorimotor impairments, while the implementation of training algorithms can be aimed at improving neuromuscular control. The purpose of this study was to use a robotic device to develop an adaptive and individualized training program of the distal upper extremity for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). This approach included an online assessment of performance aimed at changing the level of assistance/resistance provided during the task. Participants (N = 7) completed a robotic training program that occurred 3 times weekly for 4 weeks. The training protocol consisted of tracking a target moving along a figure by grasping the end‐effector of the robotic device and moving it along the trajectory. Outcome measures were assessed pre‐ and post‐intervention. Improvements in performance were quantified by average tracking (p = 0.028) and figural error (p = 0.028), which was significantly reduced by 26% and 43%, respectively. Isometric wrist strength significantly improved post‐intervention (flexion: p = 0.043, radial and ulnar deviation: p = 0.028). The results of this work demonstrate that 4‐weeks of adaptive robotic training is a feasible rehabilitative program that has the potential to improve distal upper extremity motor accuracy and muscular strength in a MS population.noneMannella K.; Albanese G.A.; Ditor D.; Zenzeri J.; Holmes M.W.R.Mannella, K.; Albanese, G. A.; Ditor, D.; Zenzeri, J.; Holmes, M. W. R
    corecore