Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Simulation studies have shown that accuracy and genetic gain are increased in genomic selection schemes compared to traditional aquaculture sib-based schemes. In genomic selection, accuracy of selection can be maximized by increasing the precision of the estimation of SNP effects and by maximizing the relationships between test sibs and candidate sibs. Another means of increasing the accuracy of the estimation of SNP effects is to create individuals in the test population with extreme genotypes. The latter approach was studied here with creation of double haploids and use of non-random mating designs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Six alternative breeding schemes were simulated in which the design of the test population was varied: test sibs inherited maternal (<it>Mat</it>), paternal (<it>Pat</it>) or a mixture of maternal and paternal (<it>MatPat</it>) double haploid genomes or test sibs were obtained by maximum coancestry mating (<it>MaxC</it>), minimum coancestry mating (<it>MinC</it>), or random (<it>RAND</it>) mating. Three thousand test sibs and 3000 candidate sibs were genotyped. The test sibs were recorded for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates and were used to estimate SNP effects. Selection was done by truncation on genome-wide estimated breeding values and 100 individuals were selected as parents each generation, equally divided between both sexes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results showed a 7 to 19% increase in selection accuracy and a 6 to 22% increase in genetic gain in the <it>MatPat</it> scheme compared to the <it>RAND</it> scheme. These increases were greater with lower heritabilities. Among all other scenarios, i.e. <it>Mat, Pat, MaxC</it>, and <it>MinC</it>, no substantial differences in selection accuracy and genetic gain were observed.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In conclusion, a test population designed with a mixture of paternal and maternal double haploids, i.e. the <it>MatPat</it> scheme, increases substantially the accuracy of selection and genetic gain. This will be particularly interesting for traits that cannot be recorded on the selection candidates and require the use of sib tests, such as disease resistance and meat quality.</p

Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The risk of long-term unequal contribution of mating pairs to the gene pool is that deleterious recessive genes can be expressed. Such consequences could be alleviated by appropriately designing and optimizing breeding schemes i.e. by improving selection and mating procedures.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied the effect of mating designs, random, minimum coancestry and minimum covariance of ancestral contributions on rate of inbreeding and genetic gain for schemes with different information sources, i.e. sib test or own performance records, different genetic evaluation methods, i.e. BLUP or genomic selection, and different family structures, i.e. factorial or pair-wise.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results showed that substantial differences in rates of inbreeding due to mating design were present under schemes with a pair-wise family structure, for which minimum coancestry turned out to be more effective to generate lower rates of inbreeding. Specifically, substantial reductions in rates of inbreeding were observed in schemes using sib test records and BLUP evaluation. However, with a factorial family structure, differences in rates of inbreeding due mating designs were minor. Moreover, non-random mating had only a small effect in breeding schemes that used genomic evaluation, regardless of the information source.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>It was concluded that minimum coancestry remains an efficient mating design when BLUP is used for genetic evaluation or when the size of the population is small, whereas the effect of non-random mating is smaller in schemes using genomic evaluation.</p

Open Access

Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test population