Effects of Clinical and Tumor Characteristics on Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bone Metastasis

Muhammet Ozer,1 Suleyman Yasin Goksu,2 Rick Y Lin,3 Ruveyda Ayasun,4 Doga Kahramangil,5 Sherise C Rogers,5,6 Jesus C Fabregas,5,6 Brian H Ramnaraign,5,6 Thomas J George,5,6 Michael Feely,7 Roniel Cabrera,8 Sergio Duarte,9 Ali Zarrinpar,9 Ilyas Sahin5,6 1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 3Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA; 4Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 5Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 6University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA; 7Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 8Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 9Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USACorrespondence: Ilyas Sahin, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA, Email [email protected]: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) generally has a dismal prognosis. Bone metastases from HCC are infrequent, with a poorer prognosis. However, the survival influencing factors are not yet well understood.Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical features and tumor characteristics of HCC patients with bone metastasis.Methods: A cohort of 170,576 adult patients with HCC was studied using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) spanning from 2010 to 2019, and within this group, 5285 patients (3.1%) were diagnosed with bone metastasis. We performed the Kaplan–Meier method to calculate the median overall survival (OS). We included demographics (age at diagnosis, gender, race, insurance status), comorbidity score, and treatment characteristics.Results: Of a total of 5285 HCC patients with bone metastasis, 86.2% were male and 61.2% were non-Hispanic white. Most patients (55.1%) were below 65, and 89% had a total Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of under 3. Among patients with known tumor grade, 24.8% had well-differentiated tumors, and 36.1% had poorly differentiated tumors. Chemotherapy was administrated to 39.5% of patients. In univariate analysis, patients with well-differentiated tumors had better OS compared to poorly differentiated tumors (5.4 months vs 3.0 months, p = 0.001). Patients who received single or multiagent chemotherapy were significantly associated with improved OS compared to patients who did not receive chemotherapy (7.0 and 8.5 months vs 1.94 months, respectively). We also found mortality difference between age, comorbidity scores, facility types and race groups.Conclusion: In this cohort analysis of NCDB data, we found better OS in treatment receipt, lower tumor grade, younger age, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic race, treatment at academic facility and lower comorbidity score in HCC patients with bone metastasis. The study results may have a consequential impact on the treatment decisions for HCC patients with bone metastasis.Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, bone metastasi

Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: To assess long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted liver resection (RLR) for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases as compared to a propensity-matched cohort of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). Although safety and short-term outcomes of RLR have been described and previously compared to LLR, long-term and oncologic data are lacking. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent RLR and LLR for CRC metastases at six high-volume centers in the USA and Europe between 2002 and 2017. Propensity matching was used to match baseline characteristics between the two groups. Data were analyzed with a focus on postoperative and oncologic outcomes, as well as long-term recurrence and survival. Results: RLR was performed in 115 patients, and 514 patients underwent LLR. Following propensity matching 115 patients in each cohort were compared. Perioperative outcomes including mortality, morbidity, reoperation, readmission, intensive care requirement, length-of-stay and margin status were not statistically different. Both prematching and postmatching analyses demonstrated similar overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between RLR and LLR at 5 years (61 vs. 60% OS, p = 0.87, and 38 vs. 31% DFS, p = 0.25, prematching; 61 vs. 60% OS, p = 0.78, and 38 vs. 44% DFS, p = 0.62, postmatching). Conclusions: Propensity score matching with a large, multicenter database demonstrates that RLR for colorectal metastases is feasible and safe, with perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes and survival that are largely comparable to LLR