4 research outputs found

    <title language="spa">Performance of a commercial assay for the diagnosis of influenza A (H1N1) infection in comparison to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention protocol of real time RT-PCR

    No full text
    At the time of influenza A (H1N1) emergency, the WHO responded with remarkable speed by releasing guidelines and a protocol for a real-time RT-PCR assay (rRT-PCR). The aim of the present study was to evalúate the performance of the "Real Time Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set" (June 2009)-Roche kit in comparison to the CDC reference rRT-PCR protocol. The overall sensitivity of the Roche assay for detection of the Inf A gene in the presence or absence of the H1 gene was 74.5 %. The sensitivity for detecting samples that were only positive for the Inf A gene (absence of the H1 gene) was 53.3 % whereas the sensitivity for H1N1-positive samples (presence of the Inf A gene and any other swine gene) was 76.4 %. The specificity of the assay was 97.1 %. A new version of the kit (November 2009) is now available, and a recent evaluation of its performance showed good sensitivity to detect pandemic H1N1 compared to other molecular assays.<br>Durante la pandemia de influenza A (H1N1), la OMS recomendó algoritmos y protocolos de detección del virus mediante RT-PCR en tiempo real. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el desempeño del equipo que comercializa la empresa Roche, Real Time Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set (junio de 2009), en comparación con el protocolo de RT-PCR en tiempo real de los CDC. La sensibilidad global del ensayo de Roche para la detección del gen Inf A en presencia o ausencia del gen H1 fue 74,5 %. La sensibilidad para la detección de muestras positivas solo para el gen Inf A (ausencia del gen H1) fue 53,3 % y la sensibilidad para la detección de muestras positivas para H1N1 (presencia del gen Inf A y cualquier otro gen porcino) fue 76,4 %. La especificidad fue 97,1 %. Existe una nueva versión del equipo (noviembre 2009) que, según se ha descrito, presenta buena sensibilidad en comparación con otros ensayos moleculares para detectar H1N1 pandémica

    Performance of a commercial assay for the diagnosis of influenza A (H1N1) infection in comparison to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention protocol of real time RT-PCR

    No full text
    At the time of influenza A (H1N1) emergency, the WHO responded with remarkable speed by releasing guidelines and a protocol for a real-time RT-PCR assay (rRT-PCR). The aim of the present study was to evalúate the performance of the "Real Time Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set" (June 2009)-Roche kit in comparison to the CDC reference rRT-PCR protocol. The overall sensitivity of the Roche assay for detection of the Inf A gene in the presence or absence of the H1 gene was 74.5 %. The sensitivity for detecting samples that were only positive for the Inf A gene (absence of the H1 gene) was 53.3 % whereas the sensitivity for H1N1-positive samples (presence of the Inf A gene and any other swine gene) was 76.4 %. The specificity of the assay was 97.1 %. A new version of the kit (November 2009) is now available, and a recent evaluation of its performance showed good sensitivity to detect pandemic H1N1 compared to other molecular assays

    Pre-treatment drug resistance and HIV-1 subtypes in infants from Argentina with and without exposure to antiretroviral drugs for prevention of mother-to-child transmission

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and patterns of pre-treatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) and HIV-1 subtype in infants from Argentina with exposure to different antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-1 genotyping was performed in 115 infants (median age = 2.3 months) born between 2007 and 2014 to screen for drug resistance mutations (DRMs) before starting first-line ART. HIV-1 subtype was characterized by phylogenetic and recombination analysis. RESULTS: Overall, DRMs were found in 34 of 115 infants (PDR level 30% to any ARV, 3.5% to PIs, 12% to NRTIs and 22% to NNRTIs). Of the 115 infants, 22 (19.1%) were ARV-unexposed. Another 93 were ARV-exposed: 28 (24.3%) to short-course zidovudine monotherapy ARV prophylaxis; 25 (21.7%) to nevirapine-based ARV prophylaxis; 12 (10.4%) to perinatal infant zidovudine prophylaxis + maternal combination ART with NNRTIs; and 28 (24.3%) to perinatal infant zidovudine prophylaxis+maternal combination ART with PIs. Transmitted drug resistance among ARV-unexposed infants was 32% (5% to PIs, 9% to NRTIs and 18% to NNRTIs). ART-exposed infants showed multi-class ARV resistance. Importantly, vertical transmission of a triple-class-resistant virus was confirmed in one case. Patterns of DRMs predicted high-level resistance to NNRTIs in a similar and high proportion (>50%) of infants with at least one DRM independently of ARV exposure. BF recombinants were found in 74%, subtype B in 20%, subtype C in 3% and novel AG and AB recombinants in 3%. CONCLUSIONS: PDR in HIV-1-infected children from Argentina is among the highest reported, jeopardizing successful lifelong suppressive ART as well as the efficacy of current PMTCT regimens.Fil: Aulicino, Paula. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Zapiola, Ines. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Infecciosas "Dr. Francisco Javier Muñiz"; ArgentinaFil: Kademian, Silvia. Ministerio de Salud; ArgentinaFil: Valle, María M. Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Subsecretaria de Planificacion y Contralor Sanitario. Direccion Provincial del Instituto Biologico "dr. Tomas Peron".; ArgentinaFil: Fernandez Giuliano, Silvina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Infecciosas "Dr. Francisco Javier Muñiz"; ArgentinaFil: Toro, Rosana Isabel. Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Subsecretaria de Planificacion y Contralor Sanitario. Direccion Provincial del Instituto Biologico "dr. Tomas Peron".; ArgentinaFil: Barbas, Maria Gabriela. Ministerio de Salud; ArgentinaFil: Cañizal, Ana M.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Infecciosas "Dr. Francisco Javier Muñiz"; ArgentinaFil: Mayon, Paula. Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Subsecretaria de Planificacion y Contralor Sanitario. Direccion Provincial del Instituto Biologico "dr. Tomas Peron".; ArgentinaFil: Golemba, Marcelo Darío. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ortiz de Zarate, Marcela. No especifíca;Fil: Corazza, Marisa S.. Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Subsecretaria de Planificacion y Contralor Sanitario. Direccion Provincial del Instituto Biologico "dr. Tomas Peron".; ArgentinaFil: Cudola, Analía. Ministerio de Salud; ArgentinaFil: Mecikovsky, Débora. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; ArgentinaFil: Bologna, Rosa. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; ArgentinaFil: Mangano, Andrea María Mercedes. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Sen, Luisa. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin
    corecore