All-suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair: a preliminary outcome study

Introduction: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of double intramedullary all-suture anchors’ fixation for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Materials and methods: A retrospective case series of patients who underwent primary distal biceps tendon repair with all-suture anchors was conducted. Functional outcome was assessed at a minimum follow-up of at 12 months based on the assessments of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Andrews–Carson Score (ACS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Maximum isometric strength test for flexion and supination as well as postoperative range of motion (ROM) were determined for both arms. Results: 23 patients treated with all-suture anchors were assessed at follow-up survey (mean age 56.5 ± 11.4 years, 96% male). The follow-up time was 20 months (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 15–23 months). The following outcome results were obtained: MEPS 100 (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 100–100); ACS 200 (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 195–200); QuickDASH 31 (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 30–31); VAS 0 (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 0–0). The mean strength compared to the uninjured side was 95.6% (range Q$_{0.25}$–Q$_{0.75}$, 80.9–104%) for flexion and 91.8 ± 11.6% for supination. There was no significant difference in ROM or strength compared to the uninjured side and no complications were observed in any patient. Conclusion: Distal biceps tendon refixation using all-suture anchors provides good-to-excellent results in terms of patient-reported and functional outcome. This repair technique appears to be a viable surgical option, although further long-term results are needed

Partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendons show only slightly lower ultimate load to failure: a biomechanical study

Abstract Objective Partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon are usually treated surgically from a size of > 50% tendon involvement. The aim of this study was to compare the ultimate load to failure of intact triceps tendons with partially ruptured tendons and describe the rupture mechanism. Methods Eighteen human fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were randomly assigned to two groups with either an intact distal triceps tendon or with a simulated partial rupture of 50% of the tendon. A continuous traction on the distal triceps tendon was applied to provoke a complete tendon rupture. The maximum required ultimate load to failure of the tendon in N was measured. In addition, video recordings of the ruptures of the intact tendons were performed and analysed by two independent investigators. Results A median ultimate load to failure of 1,390 N (range Q0.25—Q0.75, 954 – 2,360) was measured in intact distal triceps tendons. The median ultimate load to failure of the partially ruptured tendons was 1,330 N (range Q0.25—Q0.75, 1,130 – 1.470 N). The differences were not significant. All recorded ruptures began in the superficial tendon portion, and seven out of nine tendons in the lateral tendon portion. Discussion Partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon demonstrate a not statistically significant lower ultimate load to failure than intact tendons and typically occur in the superficial, lateral portion of the tendon. This finding can be helpful when deciding between surgical and conservative therapy for partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon