Characterization of the starch-acting MaAmyB enzyme from Microbacterium aurum B8.A representing the novel subfamily GH13_42 with an unusual, multi-domain organization

The bacterium Microbacterium aurum strain B8.A degrades granular starches, using the multi-domain MaAmyA α-amylase to initiate granule degradation through pore formation. This paper reports the characterization of the M. aurum B8.A MaAmyB enzyme, a second starch-acting enzyme with multiple FNIII and CBM25 domains. MaAmyB was characterized as an α-glucan 1,4-α-maltohexaosidase with the ability to subsequently hydrolyze maltohexaose to maltose through the release of glucose. MaAmyB also displays exo-activity with a double blocked PNPG7 substrate, releasing PNP. In M. aurum B8.A, MaAmyB may contribute to degradation of starch granules by rapidly hydrolyzing the helical and linear starch chains that become exposed after pore formation by MaAmyA. Bioinformatics analysis showed that MaAmyB represents a novel GH13 subfamily, designated GH13_42, currently with 165 members, all in Gram-positive soil dwelling bacteria, mostly Streptomyces. All members have an unusually large catalytic domain (AB-regions), due to three insertions compared to established α-amylases, and an aberrant C-region, which has only 30% identity to established GH13 C-regions. Most GH13_42 members have three N-terminal domains (2 CBM25 and 1 FNIII). This is unusual as starch binding domains are commonly found at the C-termini of α-amylases. The evolution of the multi-domain M. aurum B8.A MaAmyA and MaAmyB enzymes is discussed

Characterization of the 4,6-α-glucanotransferase GTFB enzyme of Lactobacillus reuteri 121 isolated from inclusion bodies

BACKGROUND: The GTFB enzyme of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri 121 is a 4,6-α-glucanotransferase of glycoside hydrolase family 70 (GH70; http://www.cazy.org ). Contrary to the glucansucrases in GH70, GTFB is unable to use sucrose as substrate, but instead converts malto-oligosaccharides and starch into isomalto-/malto- polymers that may find application as prebiotics and dietary fibers. The GTFB enzyme expresses well in Escherichia coli BL21 Star (DE3), but mostly accumulates in inclusion bodies (IBs) which generally contain wrongly folded protein and inactive enzyme. METHODS: Denaturation followed by refolding, as well as ncIB preparation were used for isolation of active GTFB protein from inclusion bodies. Soluble, refolded and ncIB GTFB were compared using activity assays, secondary structure analysis by FT-IR, and product analyses by NMR, HPAEC and SEC. RESULTS: Expression of GTFB in E. coli yielded > 100 mg/l relatively pure and active but mostly insoluble GTFB protein in IBs, regardless of the expression conditions used. Following denaturing, refolding of GTFB protein was most efficient in double distilled H2O. Also, GTFB ncIBs were active, with approx. 10 % of hydrolysis activity compared to the soluble protein. When expressed as units of activity obtained per liter E. coli culture, the total amount of ncIB GTFB expressed possessed around 180 % hydrolysis activity and 100 % transferase activity compared to the amount of soluble GTFB enzyme obtained from one liter culture. The product profiles obtained for the three GTFB enzyme preparations were similar when analyzed by HPAEC and NMR. SEC investigation also showed that these 3 enzyme preparations yielded products with similar size distributions. FT-IR analysis revealed extended β-sheet formation in ncIB GTFB providing an explanation at the molecular level for reduced GTFB activity in ncIBs. The thermostability of ncIB GTFB was relatively high compared to the soluble and refolded GTFB. CONCLUSION: In view of their relatively high yield, activity and high thermostability, both refolded and ncIB GTFB derived from IBs in E. coli may find industrial application in the synthesis of modified starches