Efficacy of tissue brushing as measured by the prosthodontic tissue index

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of brushing the oral mucosa supporting complete dentures with a soft brush to see if this treatment would reduce inflammation. The oral mucosa health status of 60 patients was monitored for 120 days using the PTI to measure inflammation. For comparison the patients were divided into two groups, and every effort was made to balance the groups for those variables that may effect inflammation. The patients were also compared with themselves. The experiment consisted of three phases; Phase 1 established baseline data, and Phases 2 and 3 were information-gathering sessions. Each patient received brushing instructions at the start of the brushing test period and additional brushing instruction during a reinforcement session after 30 days. Tissue brushing did reduce the inflammation index of the oral mucosa examined.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74782/1/j.1754-4505.1984.tb00150.x.pd

A Review of the Occurrence of Bats (Chiroptera) on Islands in the North East Atlantic and on North Sea Installations

The bats recorded from Iceland, the Faroe Islands, the Shetland Islands, the Orkney Islands, and North Sea installations are reviewed to the end of 2012. In total 12 species have been positively identified, while a considerable proportion of all records are sightings of unidentified bats. Eight of the species are European in origin and four originate from the New World. The largest number of species (8) has been recorded in Iceland, but the greatest number of individuals (180) has been found in Orkney. The bat invasion on the Faroe Islands in 2010 is without precedence, when 70 observations of a minimum of 45 individuals were noted. Most bat observations in the study area occurred in the autumn, with fewer in the spring. Most observations were of single animals, but there were also sightings of up to 12 individuals. There has been a marked increase in bat records in the past three decades. We discuss whether this is a real increase, or due to improved communications, increased public awareness, increased shipping, changes in weather patterns and/or the effects of climate change. All factors appear to be involved.© Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS. The attached document is the author(’s’) final accepted/submitted version of the journal article. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it

Variability of argon laser-induced sensory and pain thresholds on human oral mucosa and skin.

The variability of laser-induced pain perception on human oral mucosa and hairy skin was investigated in order to establish a new method for evaluation of pain in the orofacial region. A high-energy argon laser was used for experimental pain stimulation, and sensory and pain thresholds were determined. The intra-individual coefficients of variation for oral thresholds were comparable to cutaneous thresholds. However, inter-individual variation was smaller for oral thresholds, which could be due to larger variation in cutaneous optical properties. The short-term and 24-hr changes in thresholds on both surfaces were less than 9%. The results indicate that habituation to laser thresholds may account for part of the intra-individual variation observed. However, the subjective ratings of the intensity of the laser stimuli were constant. Thus, oral thresholds may, like cutaneous thresholds, be used for assessment and quantification of analgesic efficacies and to investigate various pain conditions

Hypoalgesic effect of EMLA and lidocaine gel applied on human oral mucosa: quantitative evaluation by sensory and pain thresholds to argon laser stimulation.

Sensory and pain thresholds to argon laser stimulation were used to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and duration of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and a 2% lidocaine gel applied topically on the oral mucosa. Application of EMLA for 2 min on the tongue and gingiva increased the pain thresholds by 92.8% and 63.4% respectively. Corresponding values for lidocaine gel were 53.6% and 21.9%. Standardized variation of the EMLA application period (2, 5, and 15 min) produced significantly different analgesic profiles on the tongue but not on the gingiva. Application of EMLA for 5 and 15 min on the tongue and for 2, 5, and 15 min on the gingiva increased the pain thresholds to a predefined analgesic level (2.15 W) for 2 to 25 min. The present experimental model for assessment of oral mucosa pain is suggested to be well-suited for investigations of intraoral analgesia