The "Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument (PQLI)" in terminal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the development of a new quality of life instrument in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. METHODS: The Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument incorporates six multi-item and one single-item scale. The questionnaire was completed at baseline and one-week after. The final sample consisted of 120 patients. RESULTS: The average time required to complete the questionnaire, in both time points, was approximately 8 minutes. All multi-item scales met the minimal standards for reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient ≥.70) either before or during palliative treatment. Test-retest reliability in terms of Spearman-rho coefficient was also satisfactory (p < 0.05). Validity was demonstrated by inter-item correlations, comparisons with ECOG performance status, factor analysis, criterion-related validation, and correlations with the Assessment of Quality of Life in Palliative Care Instrument (AQEL), and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3.0). CONCLUSION: The PQLI is a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer

A Prospective, Real-World, Multinational Study of Naloxegol for Patients with Cancer Pain Diagnosed with Opioid-Induced Constipation—The NACASY Study

Cancer pain; Naloxegol; Ppioid-induced constipationDolor por cáncer; Naloxegol; Estreñimiento inducido por opioidesDolor per càncer; Naloxegol; Restrenyiment induït per opioidesThe Naloxegol Cancer Study (NACASY) was a multinational European study aimed to evaluate the 4-week safety and efficacy of naloxegol in a real-world setting in patients with cancer pain diagnosed with opioid-induced constipation. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events leading to study discontinuation. We recruited 170 patients who received at least one dose of naloxegol (i.e., safety population). Out of 170 patients, 20 (11.8%, 95%CI 6.9–16.6) discontinued the study due to adverse events, and, of them, 12 (7.1%, 95%CI 3.2–10.9%) were study discontinuations due to naloxegol-related adverse events. From 76 patients subjects who had completed both 4 weeks of treatment and 28 days of the diary, 55 patients (72.4%, 95% CI 62.3–82.4%) were regarded as responders (i.e., showed ≥3 bowel-movements per week and an increase of ≥1 bowel-movement over baseline) to naloxegol treatment. The Patient Assessment of Constipation—Quality of Life Questionnaire total score and all its subscales improved from baseline to 4 weeks of follow up. Our findings support and provide new evidence about the beneficial effect of naloxegol in terms of improvement of constipation and quality-of-life in patients with cancer-related pain and opioid-induced constipation and show a safety profile consistent with previous pivotal and real-world studies.This project was funded by Kyowa Kirin International. Role of the funding source: The funder of the study and its employees and assignees were involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of all related reports and publications

Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Unfit for Resection, Ablation, or Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Purpose. The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and the toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with advanced hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT). Methods. Between 2007 and 2012, in a retrospective way, 9 patients (median age 69 years) with advanced HCC and IVCTT unfit for surgery, radiofrequency ablation, embolization, or chemotherapy were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). The radiotherapy volume included both primary tumor and IVTT. The radiotherapy schedule was 50–52 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Overall survival (OS), response to radiotherapy, visual analogue scale (VAS), and toxicity were assessed. Results. All patients demonstrated a response rate up to 60%. During radiotherapy, 3 patients experienced grade 1 nausea/vomit toxicity. All patients demonstrated an elevation of the liver enzymes (3 patients with grade 1 and 6 patients with grade 2). The mean VAS-score was decreased from 6.11 to 3.11, while the median overall survival was 24 months. Conclusion. 3DCRT achieves a very high local control rate and is suitable for patients with HCC and IVTT, while the documented radiation induced toxicity is moderate. It can be recommended for palliation in patients unable to undergo curative therapies

Clinical hypnosis in palliative care

Christina Liossi and Kyriaki Mystakidou put the case for hypnosis, whether it is self-induced or induced by a qualified therapist, in palliative care patient

Comparison of tropisetron and chlorpromazine combinations in the control of nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced cancer

This single-institution, prospective, randomized trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of tropisetron and chlorpromazine in the management of nausea and vomiting of terminal cancer patients. Patients had no recent chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and emesis was not due to bowel obstruction, electrolytic or metabolic disturbances, drug intake, or intracranial disease. One hundred and sixty patients randomly received either (a) chlorpromazine (CLO) (50 mg/day) plus dexamethasone (DEX) (2 mg/day), (b) chlorpromazine (25 mg/day) plus tropisetron (TRO) (5 mg/day), (c) chlorpromazine (25 mg/day) plus tropisetron (5 mg/day) plus dexamethasone (2 mg/day), or (d) tropisetron (TRO) (5 mg/day). Patients were monitored from day 1 to day 15. No nausea or vomiting was defined as “total” control. On day 15, total vomiting control was achieved in 33.3% of the patients receiving CLO + DEX, 84.6% of the patients receiving CLO + TRO, 92.5% of the patients receiving CLO + TRO + DEX, and 78.9% of the patients receiving TRO. Total control of nausea was achieved in 18.0% of the patients receiving CLO + DEX, 74.4% of the patients receiving (CLO + TRO), 85.0% of the patients receiving CLO + TRO + DEX, and 65.8% of the patients receiving TRO. Tropisetron-containing combinations produced significant control of nausea and vomiting from the third day onward. All antiemetic drugs were well tolerated. These data suggest that tropisetron-containing combinations or tropisetron as a single agent are much more effective in the control of emesis in patients with advanced cancer than the conventional antiemetic combination of chlorpromazine plus dexamethasone. Tropisetron is well tolerated and may be the best choice for controlling persistent nausea and vomiting in terminal cancer patients