Improvement in Frailty in a Patient With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease After Ninjin'yoeito Therapy: A Case Report

Frailty is a poor prognostic factor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although various studies have assessed the effects of conventional treatment with bronchodilators, nutritional support, and pulmonary rehabilitation for frailty in patients with COPD, none have addressed the effects of traditional Japanese medicine (Kampo medicine). Herein, we report the successful management of frailty using Ninjin'yoeito therapy in a 76-year-old patient with COPD. Despite being prescribed multiple bronchodilators, nutritional supplement therapy, patient education, and pulmonary rehabilitation, the patient exhibited unintentional weight loss, low energy, and low physical activity. Ninjin'yoeito was prescribed and these subjective symptoms began to improve 1 month after treatment initiation. In 6 months, the patient reported no frailty, had increased muscle mass, and had achieved an almost normal healthy state. Ninjin'yoeito has been associated with both physical effects, such as improvement in overall physical strength and appetite, and reduction in fatigue, and psychological effects, such as greater motivation and reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms. Physicians have usually treated COPD primarily with organ-specific treatments, such as bronchodilators; however, addressing both the physiological and psychological vulnerability has been difficult. This case report illustrates the potential usefulness of Ninjin'yoeito treatment for frailty in patients with COPD

Inhibitory Effects of Chlorella Extract on Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Airway Remodeling in a Murine Model of Asthma

Chlorella extract （CE） has been shown to induce production of T helper-1 cytokines, and regulate serum IgE levels in animal models of asthma. We aimed to evaluate whether CE could inhibit ovalbumin （OVA）-induced airway hyperresponsiveness （AHR） and airway remodeling in a murine model of asthma. Balb/c mice were allocated to four groups: a control group （no OVA exposure, not given CE）, a CE group （no OVA exposure, given CE）, an asthma group （sensitized/challenged with OVA, not given CE） and a CE＋asthma group （sensitized/challenged with OVA, given CE）. In the asthma and CE＋asthma groups, mice were sensitized with OVA on day 0 and day 12, and then challenged with OVA on three consecutive days. In the CE and CE＋asthma groups, the mice were given feed containing 2％ CE. We assessed AHR to methacholine, and analyzed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid （BALF）, serum, lung tissue and spleen cells. Administration of CE was associated with significantly lower AHR in OVA-sensitized and challenged mice. CE administration was also associated with marked reduction of total cells, eosinophils and T helper-2 cytokines （IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13） in BALF. In addition, administration of CE significantly decreased the numbers of periodic acid-Schiff （PAS）-positive cells in OVA-sensitized and challenged mice. Administration of CE also directly suppressed IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 production in spleen cells of OVA-sensitized and challenged mice. These results indicate that CE can partly prevent AHR and airway remodeling in a murine model of asthma

Long-term follow-up of production of IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among patients with COVID-19

The patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 （COVID-19） produce IgM and IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 （SARS-CoV-2）. However, the frequency and duration of antibody production still need to be fully understood. In the present study, we investigated the duration of antibody production after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were monitored over twelve months for the production of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies, and the characteristics of these patients were examined. Forty-five patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were enrolled, and thirty-four patients were followed up until they tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies or up to twelve months after the date of a negative SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction （PCR） result. The positivity rates of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were 27.3％ and 68.2％ when SARS-CoV-2 PCR was negative, 20.6％ and 70.6％ after one month, 8.8％ and 52.9％ after three months, and 0.0％ and 14.7％ after six months, respectively. Moreover, we compared patients with milder conditions who did not require oxygen administration with those with severe conditions which required oxygen administration. The positivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was significantly higher in patients with severe conditions than in those with milder conditions on the date of a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR result and after one month and three months, but not after six months. Patients with more severe COVID-19 produced more SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Moreover, it is suggested that the duration of IgG antibody production is independent of COVID-19 severity

Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapy

In the past two decades, several molecular targeted inhibitors have been developed and evaluated clinically to improve the survival of patients with cancer. Molecular targeted inhibitors inhibit the activities of pathogenic tyrosine kinases. Particularly, aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activation is a potential therapeutic target. An increased understanding of genetics, cellular biology and structural biology has led to the development of numerous important therapeutics. Pathogenic RTK mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification/over-expressions have been identified and are currently being examined for their roles in cancers. Therapies targeting RTKs are categorized as small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Studies are underway to explore abnormalities in 20 types of RTK subfamilies in patients with cancer or other diseases. In this review, we describe representative RTKs important for developing cancer therapeutics and predicting or evaluated resistance mechanisms

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapies and Placebo in Patients with Uncontrolled Eosinophilic Asthma:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Phase 3 Trials

The overall efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin （IL）-5 therapies at currently recommended dosages and administration remain to be fully characterized. The present study was a meta-analysis of Phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-5 therapies at the currently recommended dosages and administration compared with placebo in patients with uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. This meta-analysis complied with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary efficacy outcome was asthma exacerbation rate, and the primary safety outcomes included the incidence rates of all adverse events, asthma worsening, and injection site reactions. A subgroup analysis was also performed according to the type of anti-IL-5 agent. Pooled estimates are presented as rate ratios or relative risks （RRs） with 95% confidence intervals （CIs）. Analyses included intention-to-treat cases. Six randomized controlled trials of anti-IL-5 therapies met the inclusion criteria. The overall rate ratio for asthma exacerbation was 0.54 （95% CI 0.47-0.61）. The RRs （95% CIs） for the incidence of all adverse events, asthma worsening, and injection site reactions compared with placebo were 0.93 （0.89-0.96）, 0.63 （0.56-0.72）, and 1.59 （0.95-2.65）, respectively. The subgroup analysis revealed that the incidence of injection site reactions was significantly higher among mepolizumab- than placebo-treated patients, with an RR of 2.56 （95% CI 1.15-5.68）. These results suggest that anti-IL-5 therapies at the currently recommended dosages and administration are effective and generally well tolerated in patients with uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. However, the occurrence of injection site reactions warrants specific attention, especially concerning mepolizumab administration

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib and Alectinib for ALK-Rearrangement Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Asian and Non-Asian Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

To date, there have been no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib and alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a network meta-analysis comparing six treatment arms (lorlatinib, brigatinib, alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and platinum-based chemotherapy) in overall participants and in Asian and non-Asian subgroups. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (G3-AEs). There were no significant differences between lorlatinib and alectinib in overall participants for both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.742; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.466–1.180) and OS (HR, 1.180; 95% CrI, 0.590–2.354). In the Asian subgroup, there were no significant differences in PFS between lorlatinib and alectinib (HR, 1.423; 95% CrI, 0.748–2.708); however, in the non-Asian subgroup, PFS was significantly better with lorlatinib than with alectinib (HR, 0.388; 95% CrI, 0.195–0.769). The incidence of G3-AEs in overall participants was significantly higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (risk ratio, 1.918; 95% CrI, 1.486–2.475). These results provide valuable information regarding the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in ALK-p ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced NSCLC. Larger head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate the study results

A Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist （LAMA） Added to an Inhaled Corticosteroid and Long-acting Beta-2 Agonist Versus LAMA Alone in Moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

We assessed the overall efficacy and safety of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist （LAMA） added to an inhaled corticosteroid （ICS） and long-acting beta-2 agonist （LABA） as a combination therapy （LAMA＋ICS/LABA） versus LAMA monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease （COPD）. The overall efficacy and safety of LAMA＋ICS/LABA versus LAMA in patients with COPD were assessed by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials （RCTs）. We identified LAMA＋ICS/LABA RCTs by searching PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database. Primary efficacy outcomes were changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second （FEV1.0） from baseline. Incidences of all adverse events （AAEs） were the primary safety outcomes. Pooled estimates are presented as mean differences （MDs） or risk ratios （RRs） with 95％ confidence intervals （CIs）. Analyses included intention-to-treat cases. Three LAMA＋ICS/LABA RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in this study. The MD, RRs, and their 95％ CIs regarding changes in FEV1.0 for LAMA＋ICS/LABA compared with those of LAMA were 0.08 （0.04 to 0.13）; RRs and 95％ CIs for AAEs of LAMA＋ICS/LABA compared with those of LAMA were 1.03 （0.82 to 1.29）. Conclusions: Pulmonary function was significantly improved in the LAMA＋ICS/LABA group with no significant increase in AAE risk. These results provide important analysis regarding the overall efficacy and safety of LAMA＋ICS/LABA in patients with COPD

Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases and acquired resistance complicate the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, this review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of brain metastasis, acquired resistance, and prospects for overcoming these challenges. A network meta-analysis of relevant phase III randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacies of multiple ALK inhibitors by drug and generation in overall patients with ALK-p untreated advanced NSCLC and a subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Generation-specific comparison results showed that third-generation ALK inhibitors were significantly more effective than second-generation ALK inhibitors in prolonging the PFS of the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. Drug-specific comparison results demonstrated that lorlatinib was the most effective in prolonging PFS, followed by brigatinib, alectinib, ensartinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy. While lorlatinib was superior to brigatinib for PFS in the overall patient population, no significant difference between the two was found in the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. These results can serve as a foundation for basic, clinical, and translational research and guide clinical oncologists in developing individualized treatment strategies for patients with ALK-p, ALK inhibitor-naive advanced NSCLC

Alectinib Versus Crizotinib for Previously Untreated Alk-positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer : A Meta-Analysis

The safety and efficacy profiles of alectinib versus crizotinib for patients with previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase （ALK）-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer still remains to be elucidated. We compared the overall efficacies of alectinib and crizotinib for previously untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was progression-free survival （PFS）. Pooled estimates were calculated as hazard ratios with 95％ confidence intervals. Two studies on alectinib met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. The hazard ratio （95％ confidence interval） of alectinib for PFS, relative to crizotinib, was 0.41 （0.28-0.60）, demonstrating a superior overall efficacy of alectinib over crizotinib, in terms of PFS