Impact of Interatrial Shunts on Invasive Hemodynamics and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Heart Failure

Approximately 50% of patients with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction. Although a wide variety of conditions cause or contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, elevated left ventricular filling pressures, particularly during exercise, are common to all causes. Acute elevation in left-sided filling pressures promotes lung congestion and symptoms of dyspnea, while chronic elevations often lead to pulmonary vascular remodeling, right heart failure, and increased risk of mortality. Pharmacologic therapies, including neurohormonal modulation and drugs that modify the nitric oxide/cyclic GMP-protein kinase G pathway have thus far been limited in reducing symptoms or improving outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Hence, alternative means of reducing the detrimental rise in left-sided heart pressures are being explored. One proposed method of achieving this is to create an interatrial shunt, thus unloading the left heart at rest and during exercise. Currently available studies have shown 3- to 5-mm Hg decreases of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise despite increased workload. The mechanisms underlying the hemodynamic changes are just starting to be understood. In this review we summarize results of recent studies aimed at elucidating the potential mechanisms of improved hemodynamics during exercise tolerance following interatrial shunt implantation and the current interatrial shunt devices under investigation

Resting and exercise haemodynamic characteristics of patients with advanced heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Aims: This study aimed to describe haemodynamic features of patients with advanced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as defined by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Methods and results: We used pooled data from two dedicated HFpEF studies with invasive exercise haemodynamic protocols, the REDUCE LAP-HF (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure) trial and the REDUCE LAP-HF I trial, and categorized patients according to advanced heart failure (AdHF) criteria. The well-characterized HFpEF patients were considered advanced if they had persistent New York Heart Association classification of III–IV and heart failure (HF) hospitalization < 12 months and a 6 min walk test distance < 300 m. Twenty-four (22%) out of 108 patients met the AdHF criteria. On evaluation, clinical characteristics and resting haemodynamics were not different in the two groups. Patients with AdHF had lower work capacity compared with non-advanced patients (35 ± 16 vs. 45 ± 18 W, P = 0.021). Workload-corrected pulmonary capillary wedge pressure normalized to body weight (PCWL) was higher in AdHF patients compared with non-advanced (112 ± 55 vs. 86 ± 49 mmHg/W/kg, P = 0.04). Further, AdHF patients had a smaller increase in cardiac index during exercise (1.1 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.9 L/min/m2, P = 0.028). Conclusions: A significantly higher PCWL and lower cardiac index reserve during exercise were observed in AdHF patients compared with non-advanced. These differences were not apparent at rest. Therapies targeting the haemodynamic compromise associated with advanced HFpEF are needed

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Atrial Shunt Therapy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Objectives: This study sought to describe AF burden and its clinical impact among individuals with HFpEF and HFmrEF who participated in a randomized clinical trial of atrial shunt therapy (REDUCE LAP-HF II [A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure]) and to evaluate the effect of atrial shunt therapy on AF burden. Methods: Study investigators characterized AF burden among patients in the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial by using ambulatory cardiac patch monitoring at baseline (median patch wear time, 6 days) and over a 12-month follow-up (median patch wear time, 125 days). The investigators determined the association of baseline AF burden with long-term clinical events and examined the effect of atrial shunt therapy on AF burden over time. Results: Among 367 patients with cardiac monitoring data at baseline and follow-up, 194 (53%) had a history of AF or atrial flutter (AFL), and median baseline AF burden was 0.012% (IQR: 0%-1.3%). After multivariable adjustment, baseline AF burden ≥0.012% was significantly associated with heart failure (HF) events (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.17-3.44; P = 0.01) both with and without a history of AF or AFL (P for interaction = 0.68). Adjustment for left atrial reservoir strain attenuated the baseline AF burden-HF event association (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 0.93-3.14; P = 0.08). Of the 367 patients, 141 (38%) had patch-detected AF during follow-up without a history of AF or AFL. Atrial shunt therapy did not change AF incidence or burden during follow-up. Conclusions: In HFpEF and HFmrEF, nearly 40% of patients have subclinical AF by 1 year. Baseline AF burden, even at low levels, is associated with HF events. Atrial shunt therapy does not affect AF incidence or burden.</p

Transcatheter InterAtrial Shunt Device for the treatment of heart failure: Rationale and design of the pivotal randomized trial to REDUCE Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure II (REDUCE LAP-HF II): Rationale and design of REDUCE LAP-HF II

Background: A randomized, sham-controlled trial in patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% demonstrated reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) with a novel transcatheter InterAtrial Shunt Device (IASD). Whether this hemodynamic effect will translate to an improvement in cardiovascular outcomes and symptoms requires additional study. Study design and objectives: REDUCE Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure II (REDUCE LAP HF-II) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, blinded trial designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the IASD in symptomatic HF and elevated left atrial pressures. Up to 608 HF patients age ≥ 40 years with LVEF ≥40%, PCWP ≥25 mm Hg during supine ergometer exercise, and PCWP ≥5 mm Hg higher than right atrial pressure will be randomized 1:1 to the IASD versus sham control. Key exclusion criteria include hemodynamically significant valvular disease, evidence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and right heart dysfunction. The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite, analyzed by the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld methodology, that includes (1) cardiovascular mortality or first nonfatal ischemic stroke through 12 months; (2) total (first plus recurrent) HF hospitalizations or healthcare facility visits for intravenous diuretics up to 24 months, analyzed when the last randomized patient completes 12 months of follow-up; and (3) change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score from baseline to 12 months. Follow-up echocardiography will be performed at 6, 12, and 24 months to evaluate shunt flow and cardiac chamber size/function. Patients will be followed for a total of 5 years after the index procedure. Conclusions: REDUCE LAP-HF II is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the IASD device in patients with symptomatic HF with elevated left atrial pressure and LVEF ≥40%

Impact of atrial fibrillation on rest and exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are becoming the most prevalent forms of heart failure. Patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF in atrial fibrillation (AF) have poorer survival and quality of life, but the mechanism underpinning this is unknown. We sought to investigate the influence of AF on the haemodynamic profile of HFpEF/HFmrEF patients at rest and during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: We invasively measured central haemodynamics at rest and during symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise in HFpEF/HFmrEF patients, 35 in sinus rhythm and 20 in AF with matched left ventricular ejection fraction. At rest, AF patients had significantly increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, lower cardiac index and reduced left ventricular stroke work index, despite similar resting heart rate. Under resting conditions, calculated oxygen consumption and systemic arteriovenous oxygen gradient were not different between the two groups. During supine cycling at similar levels of workload, AF patients exhibited a reduced capacity to increase their oxygen consumption and this was accompanied by a persistently impaired cardiac index and left ventricular stroke work index. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse interaction of AF and HFpEF/HFmrEF may be accounted for by an adverse impact on left ventricular systolic function and peripheral oxygen kinetics