Temporal contiguity determines overshadowing and potentiation of human Action-Outcome performance

Three experiments (n = 81, n = 81, n = 82, respectively) explored how temporal contiguity infuences Action-Outcome learning, assessing whether an intervening signal competed, facilitated, or had no efect on performance and causal attribution in undergraduate participants. Across experiments, we observed competition and facilitation as a function of the temporal contiguity between Action and Outcome. When there was a strong temporal relationship between Action and Outcome, the signal competed with the action, hindering instrumental performance but not causal attribution (Experiments 1 and 3). However, with weak temporal contiguity, the same signal facilitated both instrumental performance and causal attribution (Experiments 1 and 2). Finally, the physical intensity of the signal determined the magnitude of competition. As anticipated by associative learning models, a more salient signal attenuated to a greater extent instrumental performance (Experiment 3). These results are discussed by reference to a recent adaptation of the confgural theory of learning