Modelling imperfect adherence to HIV induction therapy

Abstract Background Induction-maintenance therapy is a treatment regime where patients are prescribed an intense course of treatment for a short period of time (the induction phase), followed by a simplified long-term regimen (maintenance). Since induction therapy has a significantly higher chance of pill fatigue than maintenance therapy, patients might take drug holidays during this period. Without guidance, patients who choose to stop therapy will each be making individual decisions, with no scientific basis. Methods We use mathematical modelling to investigate the effect of imperfect adherence during the inductive phase. We address the following research questions: 1. Can we theoretically determine the maximal length of a possible drug holiday and the minimal number of doses that must subsequently be taken while still avoiding resistance? 2. How many drug holidays can be taken during the induction phase? Results For a 180 day therapeutic program, a patient can take several drug holidays, but then has to follow each drug holiday with a strict, but fairly straightforward, drug-taking regimen. Since the results are dependent upon the drug regimen, we calculated the length and number of drug holidays for all fifteen protease-sparing triple-drug cocktails that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Conclusions Induction therapy with partial adherence is tolerable, but the outcome depends on the drug cocktail. Our theoretical predictions are in line with recent results from pilot studies of short-cycle treatment interruption strategies and may be useful in guiding the design of future clinical trials

Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine and lamivudine in patients with HIV-1 infection

The purpose of this parallel treatment group, double-blind. multicenter study was to lharacterize the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine and lamivudine when coadministered to patients with the HIV-1 infection. This pharmacokinetic interaction study was nested within a larger Phase III clinical trial conducted to characterize the safety and efficacy of coadministered nevirapine and lamivudine. One hundred HIV-1 infected patients with CD4+ lymphocyte counts=200 cells/mm3 and who were on a background of nucleoside (zidovudine [ZDV], didanosine [ddl], zalcitabine [ddC], stavudine [d4T]) therapy were randomly assigned to be treated with either nucleoside+ lamivudine+nevirapine or nucleoside+lamivudine+ placebo. Each patient underwent blood sampling at defined times for the purpose of determining the concentration of nevirapine in plasma and lamivudine in serum under steady-state conditions. Each patient was also monitored closely for concomitant administration of other drugs, including ZDV, ddl, ddC, d4T and cotrimoxazole. The pharmacokinetics of nevirapine and lamivudine were characterized using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. There were no reported serious adverse events during the 40-day pharmacokinetic study. The results of the modeling analysis revealed that nevirapine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine. Estimates of the apparent clearance for nevirapine (CL/F=3.3 L/hour; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 2.9 to 3.7 L/hour) and lamivudine (CL/F 27.6 L/hour; 95% Cl 22 to 33.2 L/hour) were consistent with the values reported in earlier trials. However, the results also showed that concomitant administration of lamivudine with cotrimoxazole resulted in a 31% reduction in the apparent clearance of lamivudine, resulting in a 43% increase in the average steady-state lamivudine serum concentrations. These results indicate that chronic concurrent administration of cotrimoxazole with lamivudine may significantly affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine

Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Efavirenz, Atazanavir, Lamivudine and Tenofovir in the Female Genital Tract of HIV-Infected Pre-Menopausal Women

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A previously published study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in the female genital tract of HIV-infected women demonstrated differing degrees of female genital tract penetration among antiretrovirals. These blood plasma (BP) and cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) data were co-modelled for four antiretrovirals with varying CVF exposures. METHODS: Six paired BP and CVF samples were collected over 24 h, and antiretroviral concentrations determined using validated liquid chromatography (LC) with UV detection or LC-mass spectrometry analytical methods. For each antiretroviral, a BP model was fit using Bayesian estimation (ADAPT5), followed by addition of a CVF model. The final model was chosen based on graphical and statistical output, and then non-linear mixed-effects modelling using S-ADAPT was performed. Population mean parameters and their variability are reported. Model-predicated area under the concentration-time curve during the dosing interval (AUC(τ)) and exposure ratios of CVF AUC(τ):BP AUC(τ) were calculated for each drug. RESULTS: The base model uses first-order absorption with a lag time, a two-compartment model, and a series of transit compartments that transfer the drug from BP to CVF. Protein-unbound drug transfers into CVF for efavirenz and atazanavir; total drug transfers for lamivudine and tenofovir. CVF follows a one-compartment model for efavirenz and atazanavir, and a two-compartment model for lamivudine and tenofovir. As expected, inter-individual variability was high. Model-predicted CVF AUC(τ):BP AUC(τ) ratios are consistent with published results. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pharmacokinetic modelling of antiretroviral disposition in BP and CVF. These models will be further refined with tissue data, and used in clinical trials simulations to inform future studies of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in women

Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Transporters in proximal renal tubules contribute to the disposition of numerous drugs. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of tubular secretion have been progressively elucidated during the past decades. Organic anions tend to be secreted by the transport proteins OAT1, OAT3 and OATP4C1 on the basolateral side of tubular cells, and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2, MRP4, OATP1A2 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) on the apical side. Organic cations are secreted by organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 on the basolateral side, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins MATE1, MATE2/2-K, P-glycoprotein, organic cation and carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 and OCTN2 on the apical side. Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may affect any of these transporters, altering the clearance and, consequently, the efficacy and/or toxicity of substrate drugs. Interactions at the level of basolateral transporters typically decrease the clearance of the victim drug, causing higher systemic exposure. Interactions at the apical level can also lower drug clearance, but may be associated with higher renal toxicity, due to intracellular accumulation. Whereas the importance of glomerular filtration in drug disposition is largely appreciated among clinicians, DDIs involving renal transporters are less well recognized. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles, quantitative importance and clinical relevance of these transporters in drug therapy. It proposes an approach based on substrate-inhibitor associations for predicting potential tubular-based DDIs and preventing their adverse consequences. We provide a comprehensive list of known drug interactions with renally-expressed transporters. While many of these interactions have limited clinical consequences, some involving high-risk drugs (e.g. methotrexate) definitely deserve the attention of prescribers