20 research outputs found
Reinterpreting Bateman Gradients: Multiple Mating and Selection in Both Sexes of a Songbird Species
Bateman’s principle, which states that male reproductive success should increase with multiple mating, whereas female reproductive success should not, has long been used to explain sex differences in behavior. The statistical relationship between mating success and reproductive success, or Bateman gradient, has been proposed as a way to quantify sex differences in sexual selection. We used a long-term data set on the distribution of paternity in the socially monogamous dark-eyed junco to examine the effect of multiple mating on lifetime reproductive success and to determine the relative contributions of within-pair and extra-pair mating. Both sexes exhibited a strong positive Bateman gradient, even when the number of breeding years was accounted for. Although theory suggests that this pattern indicates a strong potential for sexual selection in both sexes, we argue that the interpretation of strong Bateman gradients, particularly in females, has many potential complications. We discuss several alternative explanations for our results, none of which requires sexual selection acting on female traits, including targeting of inherently fecund females by males seeking extra-pair mates and increased power to detect extra-pair offspring as family size increases. Because neither of these explanations requires that increased mating success causes increased reproductive success, we conclude that using Bateman gradients to measure the potential for sexual selection may be misleading for some mating systems and life histories, such as the iteroparous social monogamy found in juncos
Hormones and Honest Signals: Males with Larger Ornaments Elevate Testosterone More When Challenged
When male investment in mating varies with quality, reliable sexual signals may evolve. In many songbirds, testosterone mediates mating investment, suggesting that signals should be linked to testosterone production. However, because testosterone may change rapidly during behaviour such as territorial aggression and courtship, efforts to establish such a relationship have proved challenging. In a population of dark-eyed juncos, we measured individual variation in the production of short-term testosterone increases by injecting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). We found a positive correlation between the magnitude of these increases and the size of a plumage ornament (\u27tail white\u27) previously shown to be important for female choice and male-male competition. We then measured naturally elevated testosterone levels produced during male-male competition and found that they covaried with those induced by GnRH. We suggest that the association between tail white and testosterone increases may allow conspecifics to assess potential mates and competitors reliably using tail white
Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology
Organisms in a seasonal environment often schedule activities in a regular way over the year. If we assume that such annual routines have been shaped by natural selection then life-history theory should provide a basis for explaining them. We argue that many life-history trade-offs are mediated by underlying physiological variables that act on various time scales. The dynamics of these variables often preclude considering one period of the year in isolation. In order to capture the essence of annual routines, and many life-history traits, a detailed model of changes in physiological state over the annual cycle is required. We outline a modelling approach based on suitable physiological and ecological state variables that can capture this underlying biology, and describe how models based on this approach can be used to generate a range of insights and predictions
Neuroendocrine control of life histories: what do we need to know to understand the evolution of phenotypic plasticity?
Almost all life histories are phenotypically plastic: that is, life-history traits such as timing of breeding, family size or the investment in individual offspring vary with some aspect of the environment, such as temperature or food availability. One approach to understanding this phenotypic plasticity from an evolutionary point of view is to extend the optimality approach to the range of environments experienced by the organism. This approach attempts to understand the value of particular traits in terms of the selection pressures that act on them either directly or owing to trade-offs due to resource allocation and other factors such as predation risk. Because these selection pressures will between environments, the predicted optimal phenotype will too. The relationship expressing the optimal phenotype for different environments is the optimal reaction norm and describes the optimal phenotypic plasticity. However, this view of phenotypic plasticity ignores the fact that the reaction norm must be underlain by some sort of control system: cues about the environment must be collected by sense organs, integrated into a decision about the appropriate life history, and a message sent to the relevant organs to implement that decision. In multicellular animals, this control mechanism is the neuroendocrine system. The central question that this paper addresses is whether the control system affects the reaction norm that evolves. This might happen in two different ways: first, the control system will create constraints on the evolution of reaction norms if it cannot be configured to produce the optimal reaction norm and second, the control system will create additional selection pressures on reaction norms if the neuroendocrine system is costly. If either of these happens, a full understanding of the way in which selection shapes reaction norms must include details of the neuroendocrine control system. This paper presents the conceptual framework needed to explain what is meant by a constraint or cost being created by the neuroendocrine system and discusses the extent to which this occurs and some possible examples. The purpose of doing this is to encourage endocrinologists to take a fresh look at neuroendocrine mechanisms and help identify the properties of the system and situations in which these generate constraints and costs that impinge on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity
Individual variation in feather corticosterone levels and its influence on haemosporidian infection in a Neotropical bird
Corticosterone (CORT) is the main glucocorticoid hormone of amphibians, reptiles, birds and some mammals. This hormone may have evolved as an adaptive metabolic mechanism, in part because increased concentrations of CORT are essential for individuals to manage energy resources and thus cope with negative perturbations such as predation and storms. The benefits of CORT are offset by costs, because elevated levels can suppress inflammatory responses of individuals, making them more susceptible to parasites and pathogens. In this study, we investigated the relationships between feather CORT levels, infection status and diversity of haemosporidian parasites in the Blue-crowned Manakin Lepidothrix coronata, considering possible effects related to the sex and age of individuals. We predicted higher levels of feather CORT in infected individuals. We observed that feather CORT levels were similar among individuals of different sexes and ages. Although haemosporidian infection status did not vary among sexes, occurrence probability was higher among younger individuals, which may indicate that the less developed immune system of these individuals makes them more susceptible to avian malaria. Contrary to expectations, we found that feather CORT levels were not associated with the infection status and diversity of haemosporidian parasites. That haemosporidian occurrence probability does not increase with elevated feather CORT levels suggests that individuals are not immunosuppressed by elevated levels of this hormone, at least to the extent that feather CORT truly reflects individual differences in the level of this hormone.The field data collection was based upon research supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientıfico e Tecnologico (UNIVERSAL number 471092/2012-6 Faixa C to M.A.) and by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (PRONEX proj. 003/2009, number 653/2009 to M.A. and Albertina Lima). Hormone analysis was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientıfico e Tecnologico (Ciencia sem Fronteiras Chamada No. 71/2013 to M.A., D.G. and Regina Macedo). Haemosporidian laboratory work was funded by NSF DEB-1503804 to J.D.W. During the project, M.B. received a fellowship from Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientıfico e Tecnologico (CNPq). A.F. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship (PNPD scholarship) from Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nıvel Superior (CAPES)