11 research outputs found

    Colonic fermentation ā€“ more than meets the nose

    Get PDF
    Fermentation of undigested foods in the colon by its resident bacteria affects not only colonic health (protection against inflammation and tumour formation) but also influences metabolic health. Studying fermentation directly is difficult for lack of access. We hypothesise that the anatomical structure of the colon is suited to act as a fermenting chamber with the gaseous molecules (VOCs) emitted having direct effects on the colonocytes as well as gut neural and metabolic effects. We refer to this complex system as the ā€˜fermentomeā€™, and further hypothesise that alteration in the ā€˜fermentomeā€™ through dietary modification will have a direct impact on colonic as well as metabolic health and disease. The VOCs emitted may play a role in bacterial chemical signalling within the colon but importantly could also function as a ā€˜gasā€™ biomarker. Measurement of such VOCs through non-invasive methods would have important application as a hypothesis-generating tool with subsequent clinical application

    Is upper gastrointestinal radiography a cost-effective alternative to a Helicobacter pylori ā€œTest and Treatā€ strategy for patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease?

    Full text link
    Current clinical consensus supports an initial Helicobacter pylori (HP) ā€œtest and treatā€ approach when compared to immediate endoscopy for patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease. Alternative diagnostic approaches that incorporate upper GI radiography (UGI) have not been previously evaluated. We sought to determine the cost effectiveness of UGI compared to a HP test and treat strategy, incorporating recent data addressing the reduced prevalence of HP, lower cost of diagnostic interventions, and reduced attribution of PUD to HP. METHODS : Using decision analysis, three diagnostic and treatment strategies were evaluated: 1) Test and Treat ā€”initial HP serology, treat patients who test positive with HP eradication and antiulcer therapy; 2) Initial UGI series ā€”treat all patients with documented ulcer disease with HP eradication and antiulcer therapy; and 3) Initial UGI series, HP serology if ulcer present ā€” treat ulcer and HP based on diagnostic test results. RESULTS : The estimated cost per ulcer cured for each strategy were as follows: test and treat, 3,025;initialUGI,3,025; initial UGI, 3,690; and UGI with serology, 3,790.Theestimatedcostperpatienttreatmentwere:testandtreat,3,790. The estimated cost per patient treatment were: test and treat, 498; initial UGI, 610;andUGIwithserology,610; and UGI with serology, 620. When UGI reimbursement was decreased to less than $50, the UGI strategies yielded a lower cost per patient treated than the test and treat strategy. CONCLUSION : At the current level of reimbursement, UGI should not be considered a cost-effective alternative to the HP test and treat strategy for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73722/1/j.1572-0241.2000.01837.x.pd

    Reflections on the Study of Effective College Teaching and Student Ratings: One Continuing Quest and Two Unresolved Issues1

    No full text
    corecore